At least 31 states and the District of Columbia restrict cell phones in schools

New York City teachers say the state’s recently implemented cell phone ban in schools has showed that numerous students no longer know how to tell time on an old-fashioned clock.

“That’s a major skill that they’re not used to at all,” Tiana Millen, an assistant principal at Cardozo High School in Queens, told Gothamist of what she’s noticed after the ban, which went into effect in September.

Students in the city’s school system are meant to learn basic time-telling skills in the first and second grade, according to officials, though it appears children have fallen out of practice doing so in an increasingly digital world.

  • Mark@lemmy.world
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    4
    ·
    5 hours ago

    Want to be really stunned? Like, of your feet stunned?

    Ask them which country is the best country on earth.

    You’ll be floored…

  • HugeNerd@lemmy.ca
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    19
    ·
    10 hours ago

    When I grew up we looked at the height of the pile in the hourglass and we liked it! The rich kids all had sundial wristwatches though.

    • 🍉 Albert 🍉@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      6
      ·
      7 hours ago

      do we need a video essay to know that a clock display that is basically just progress bars is a good way to tell progress in that progress bar?

    • BanMe@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      3
      ·
      7 hours ago

      I have trouble with numbers (they didn’t have dyscalculia when I was a kid) and this was a chief complaint of mine, moving from elementary school to high school, where the clock were all digital. I had to “convert” it in my head to the clock face so my image-oriented brain could properly grasp it. Took me a few years to normalize it.

  • tym@lemmy.world
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    10
    arrow-down
    2
    ·
    10 hours ago

    This thread hurts my soul… it’s not the actual subject but the quickness with which apparently everyone under 40 shrugs and says ‘fuck it’… if this is too much, I can only imagine how people treat subjects like informed voting.

    • guyoverthere123@lemmy.dbzer0.com
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      3
      ·
      4 hours ago

      I can only imagine how people treat subjects like informed voting.

      No need to imagine, look at the people elected to run the United States.

      That’s how people treat subjects like informed voting.

    • HugeNerd@lemmy.ca
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      9
      ·
      10 hours ago

      Now you know how a clay tablet scribe felt when that new-fangled papyrus showed up in the high-schools.

      • Welt@lazysoci.al
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        2
        arrow-down
        1
        ·
        9 hours ago

        You’re a funny bugger :)

        I was going to reply to your hourglass and sundial joke with a reflection that hourglasses are so much older than the relatively recent development of sundials, but you clearly knew that so I didn’t. And then the one-two. You could have done cuneiform vs hieroglyphs but tablets vs papyrus is the better gag. Keep it up :)

    • leadore@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      1
      ·
      5 hours ago

      As atropa says, make sure it specifies that it’s a noiseless clock. Many of them don’t say if they are on the package, so better to order one online that specifies it’s “noiseless” in the description.

      • leadore@lemmy.world
        link
        fedilink
        arrow-up
        1
        ·
        5 hours ago

        Good warning. Analog clocks that make noise drive me nuts. Search for “noiseless analog clock” and be sure it says that in the description before buying.

      • 🍉 Albert 🍉@lemmy.world
        link
        fedilink
        arrow-up
        2
        ·
        7 hours ago

        and it is worse for dogs. the quartz clock has a ring to it, calibrated so it is just beyond human hearing, but not for dogs. they likely hear every device with a quartz clock

  • froh42@lemmy.world
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    5
    ·
    11 hours ago

    Heh, I’m early Gen X bordering on boomer and as a kid I found it a lot harder to read the time on an analog clock as opposed to the Casio digital wristwatch I had.

    Of course I could “decode” the clock, but it was not intuitive.

    • aceshigh@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      2
      ·
      7 hours ago

      I was frustrated that I couldn’t quickly and accurately read the time - Ie: it’s 1:23 rn, if I was looking at an analog clock, depending on the activity, I’d round either up or down. I found the minutes too small to read, and 90% of the time rounding was good enough.

  • super_user_do@feddit.it
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    20
    arrow-down
    1
    ·
    18 hours ago

    I am 20 and I still remember newspapers and TV talking about “teenagers these days can’t read clocks” since I can remember. it seems nobody has ever known

    • AnUnusualRelic@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      5
      arrow-down
      1
      ·
      10 hours ago

      I’m 59 and all the teenagers I knew could read clocks (both kinds) just fine, so I have no idea what you’re talking about.

    • AnarchistArtificer@slrpnk.net
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      1
      ·
      8 hours ago

      To give another data point for comparison, I am about as young a Millennials as one can be (I’m 29), and I don’t recall there being any issues in reading analog clocks in my cohort.

      This is weirdly both surprising and not surprising to me. Not surprising because like I say, I am one of the last of the Millennials, and it does seem intuitive that this would be an issue that started with Gen Z. It’s surprising though, because 9 years seems like quite a small time window for such a change to have happened

      • Aneb@lemmy.world
        link
        fedilink
        arrow-up
        2
        ·
        14 hours ago

        Yeah I graduated high school in 2019 and some of my classmates had a hard time reading analog clocks, in private schools lmao. It’s definitely has increased with Covid and smart phones but kids who don’t want to learn never do.

        • Bluewing@lemmy.world
          link
          fedilink
          arrow-up
          4
          ·
          9 hours ago

          And most kids, (and adults), never do want to learn.

          Source: I’ve stood in front of a classroom trying to make math fun

  • DupaCycki@lemmy.world
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    28
    arrow-down
    2
    ·
    19 hours ago

    ‘Old clocks’? You mean… analog clocks? The ones in practically every household outside of America?

    • GreyEyedGhost@piefed.ca
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      1
      ·
      6 hours ago

      My mom has a thing for clocks. There are some places in her house where you can see 5 clocks, not counting watches or smartphones. No, I don’t need a clock in the bathroom, yet there it is. Granted, some of those are digital clocks, but some are also analog with Roman numerals.

    • SCmSTR@lemmy.blahaj.zone
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      6
      ·
      16 hours ago

      And in! Lots of homes (edit: and other places!) have analog clocks here in the US. Historically, the US has had some really beautiful designs, too.

  • leadore@lemmy.world
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    11
    ·
    18 hours ago

    It takes just a few minutes to learn how to read an analog clock. Once you’ve got the idea, you’ll be slow deciphering the time at first, but once you start doing it, very quickly you’ll be reading it immediately with just a glance.

    I see analog clocks all over the place, especially waiting rooms and public buildings, and I have a very nice pretty one in my house. I think the people saying they’re not being used anymore just aren’t noticing them, they’re just background scenery to them and don’t enter their consciousness.

    • LwL@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      2
      ·
      11 hours ago

      I learned how to read one over 20 years ago, when am I supposed to get to the point where it’s just a glance? (And it’s not like I rarely encountered analog clocks growing up, the only clock I could see during breakfast was an analog clock…)

      I don’t mind them but for me digital is much faster to read. Granted it’s still like 2 seconds at most so not like it really matters, but I find it to be noticably more mental effort.

      • leadore@lemmy.world
        link
        fedilink
        arrow-up
        1
        ·
        5 hours ago

        It would just depend on how often you actually use them, it’s just familiarity. If you had one in your house/classroom/office that you looked at whenever you wanted to know the time (as it used to be before digital), it would take only a quick glance. Your brain recognizes the shapes, just like it recognizes words in your native language immediately without figuring out the individual letters.

      • NewNewAugustEast@lemmy.zip
        link
        fedilink
        arrow-up
        1
        ·
        7 hours ago

        How do you not read it at a glance? After 20 years you think you would just notice the general shapes, its all basically the same, especially if you simply round everything, which is what a lot of people do as time on an analog clock is rarely used super precise.

        1/4 or 1/2 after or before, and almost.

        Then what hour is the small hand approaching?

        Quarter to 3.

        Half past 1.

        Almost 4.

        Seems pretty simple. Unless you are used to 24 hours, then you would have to ignore or add 12.

      • prole@lemmy.blahaj.zone
        link
        fedilink
        arrow-up
        1
        ·
        7 hours ago

        Every classroom I was in from kindergarten through university had analog clocks on the wall, so I was absolutely able to just glance. For years.

        But since I haven’t been in a classroom for so long, and I’m not surrounded by analog clocks anymore, I think I’ve mostly lost that ability and I’ve found that it takes me a couple of seconds nowadays to decode it.

        It’s definitely a skill that needs to be practiced to keep it up

  • MiddleAgesModem@lemmy.world
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    28
    arrow-down
    4
    ·
    23 hours ago

    It’s not that stunning, they didn’t grow up with them and you don’t really see them in public these days.

    • Stabbitha@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      14
      arrow-down
      1
      ·
      22 hours ago

      We explicitly learned analog clocks in 1st grade, had worksheets and everything. What the hell are schools doing these days?

      • chunes@lemmy.world
        link
        fedilink
        arrow-up
        13
        ·
        21 hours ago

        People forget skills they don’t use. I’m guessing you and I had plenty of practice reading analog clocks over the years until the skill became completely ingrained.

        • MIDItheKID@lemmy.world
          link
          fedilink
          arrow-up
          1
          ·
          5 hours ago

          Yup. I learned cursive in the 2nd or 3rd grade. Probably the last time I used it as well. If I needed to write something in cursive, I would be pretty screwed. I remember some of the easier stuff, like the vowels. But if I needed to write a “q” or “k” I don’t think I could remember it.

          With that said, learning how to read an analog clock is way easier. It’s a formula/method, and the numbers are right there. It’s not memorization. This should be something easy to teach.

          The problem is that analog clocks are not in the curriculum for middle school and high school. It’s hard to find time to teach middle schoolers how to read clocks when you are struggling through “To Kill a Mockingbird” with a bunch of students on a 4th grade reading level.

          Teenagers in inner city schools not knowing how to read analog clocks is a much more complicated issue than it seems on the surface. The solution is not “well they should have just had the childhood that I had and it wouldn’t be a problem”

        • AnarchistArtificer@slrpnk.net
          link
          fedilink
          English
          arrow-up
          1
          ·
          8 hours ago

          Yeah, it reminds me of languages. I learned French to a pretty high level in high school (I was a try hard whose brain clicked well with languages), but over the last decade, I have rarely used those skills and I was recently shocked to realise how much my knowledge had atrophied. It’s easy to become complacent once you feel you have learned something, but you use it or you lose it.

      • Montagge@lemmy.zip
        link
        fedilink
        arrow-up
        11
        arrow-down
        2
        ·
        22 hours ago

        Judging by the stories my mom has after teaching for decades they no longer really teach anything. Nor are they allowed to. These days they have to follow a script for everything down to how you move your hands and when.

        Disruptive student? Just keep teaching like nothings going on.

        Student struggling with a subject? Don’t stop to help or try a different method to help them learn. No child left behind so they’ll still move up a grade even if they can’t read or do simple addition.

        Just make sure the students are in the classroom so the school gets money. Nothing else matters.

      • Soulg@ani.social
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        7
        arrow-down
        1
        ·
        21 hours ago

        … Not doing that anymore? Because they’re very rare and you can easily get by without it most of the time

    • BromSwolligans@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      9
      arrow-down
      1
      ·
      21 hours ago

      I work in schools. We have them in every hallway and classroom. But the kids do not know how to read them, and they don’t even seem interested to learn even though it would take all of two minutes to wrap their head around. Seen it in the middle and high schools.

  • EndOfLine@lemmy.world
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    110
    ·
    1 day ago

    I’ve been hearing this since I was a kid, though back then they just blamed the use of digital clocks instead of phones.

    • tal@lemmy.today
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      35
      ·
      1 day ago

      “These newfangled analog clocks with hands are killing the ability of people to understand clock bells. Kids these days.

      https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Striking_clock

      A striking clock is a clock that sounds the hours audibly on a bell, gong, or other audible device. In 12-hour striking, used most commonly in striking clocks today, the clock strikes once at 1:00 am, twice at 2:00 am, continuing in this way up to twelve times at 12:00 mid-day, then starts again, striking once at 1:00 pm, twice at 2:00 pm, and the pattern continues up to twelve times at 12:00 midnight.

      The striking feature of clocks was originally more important than their clock faces; the earliest clocks struck the hours, but had no dials to enable the time to be read.[1] The development of mechanical clocks in 12th century Europe was motivated by the need to ring bells upon the canonical hours to call the community to prayer. The earliest known mechanical clocks were large striking clocks installed in towers in monasteries or public squares, so that their bells could be heard far away.

      • AnarchistArtificer@slrpnk.net
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        1
        ·
        8 hours ago

        I used to live in a city with many striking clocks, which meant that no matter where you were in the city, you could probably hear a bell ring out on the hour.

        I’m realising now how much I miss it. I remember times like drinking with friends into the wee hours of the morning, when we would hear a bell and then all fall silent as we counted how many chimes there were. If it was only 2, we would laugh and continue, but for four or more, we would wince and contemplate the future consequences of our choices.

        Or while doing an all-nighter to get an assignment in before a morning deadline, how my handwriting speed would become a touch more frantic with each passing chime

      • Whats_your_reasoning@lemmy.world
        link
        fedilink
        arrow-up
        5
        ·
        19 hours ago

        I just want to say, as someone who lives near such a bell, I’m grateful that they appear to observe “quiet hours” between 8pm and 8am. When I first moved in, I was worried it’d be dinging all night. Thank goodness that’s not the case.

        I just have car alarms going off for no reason at 4am to worry about.

      • CatLikeLemming@lemmy.blahaj.zone
        link
        fedilink
        arrow-up
        2
        ·
        22 hours ago

        I thought these were still common? Any time I’m near a church they do their thing every 15 minutes, banging one bell 1-4 times and then if it’s 4 they bang another 1-12 times, signaling the time.

        Well, not entirely, they’re usually quiet during the night, but you get my point.

        Didn’t know people can’t understand those anymore.

        • dankm@lemmy.ca
          link
          fedilink
          arrow-up
          3
          ·
          16 hours ago

          The one near me plays the 4 bar “Westminster Quarters”. It plays one bar for each quarter hour. The full song on the hour, and bangs out the hour.

    • hushable@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      8
      ·
      24 hours ago

      Elder millennial here, I also struggle reading analogue clocks to this day. I can, but it just takes me a long time to do so. And I’ve been like this since I was a little kid.

    • atomicbocks@sh.itjust.works
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      9
      arrow-down
      1
      ·
      1 day ago

      I used to think it was a meme too and I still think it is to a point. But several of my recent jobs were at universities and I have met several people younger than me now who cannot read an analog clock, use a mouse, copy a file to a flash drive, or make change. To say nothing of their ability to find information that can’t be googled (like the location of a classroom). I have really begun to feel that the general population has absolutely failed GenZ and I really hope we can break the pattern before GenAlpha gets much older.

      • AnarchistArtificer@slrpnk.net
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        4
        ·
        edit-2
        8 hours ago

        I met someone the other year who didn’t know the difference between cut and paste, and copy and paste

        Edit: I agree with the last part of your comment especially. So often, I see people blaming GenZ for their lack of knowledge, but that feels unfair to me. From my perspective as a younger Millennial, it looked like society seemed to assume “oh, GenZ are digital natives, so they’re naturally a whizz at all this computer stuff” and often assumed that it wasn’t necessary to do much work to teach them how to use computers. Now that I’ve had more chance to meet GenZ folk in the workplace, I’ve heard this complaint from them a lot.

        It’s made me grateful for growing up as a Millennial. I was too young to experience the early days of computing, but at least I got to experience computers and the internet before they became the closed, walled-off gardens that GenZ grew up with

  • AllNewTypeFace@leminal.space
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    84
    arrow-down
    2
    ·
    1 day ago

    Next they’ll be surprised to find that they don’t know long division, cursive writing or 6502 assembly language

    • Em Adespoton@lemmy.ca
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      46
      arrow-down
      5
      ·
      edit-2
      1 day ago

      Exactly. I’m wondering how many of those teachers could use a slide rule or even an abacus. We’re far enough along now that I bet the majority of teachers would also be lost when confronted with a log table or a topo map and a compass.

      Astrolabe and sextant? They’d be totally lost.

      I bet most teachers don’t know how to saddle a horse, card and spin wool and flax by hand, or even use a clutch on a manual transmission vehicle, either.

      [edit] Ooh… thought of another one! I bet none of the children know how to use a rotary phone either. (In fact, since POTS has been fully DTMF for over 20 years, I doubt a dial phone would actually function today without a converter).

      • leadore@lemmy.world
        link
        fedilink
        arrow-up
        1
        ·
        4 hours ago

        I remember we were taught a segment on how to use an abacus and how they worked, because it demonstrated certain mathematical principles. Of course I don’t remember now how to use one, but I’m sure that visual demonstration of the mathematical concepts helped us as we were learning math. In the same way, learning about analog clocks at a young age would probably help with learning about geometry/trigonometry, angles and degrees, arcs, etc.

      • MasterBlaster@lemmy.world
        link
        fedilink
        arrow-up
        8
        ·
        23 hours ago

        And yet, we still have analog clocks all around us. Seems to me we should know his to use them… Unlike a sextant.

        Still, knowing what those things are and how they work just might be useful if something similar becomes important for some reason.

        Those things should be known by at least enough of the population to bring them back and use them if everything goes apocalyptic.

        If things start falling apart, I’m throwing in with the Amish.

        • Instigate@aussie.zone
          link
          fedilink
          arrow-up
          5
          arrow-down
          1
          ·
          19 hours ago

          Learning to read analogue clocks also helps provide some foundational learning for circular geometry - being able to quickly identify relevant segments of a circle and their respective fractions (5 minutes = 1/12 = 30° = π/6 rad etc.) helps build towards being able to compute circular geometric problems more easily in later years.

          • Welt@lazysoci.al
            link
            fedilink
            English
            arrow-up
            3
            ·
            9 hours ago

            Turnips more or less grow themselves, but raising a barn without modern cordless tools and truss plates requires a lot of the skills we should be lamenting the loss of. Hand saws, hand planes, handmade nails (that are expensive), hand sharpening and sanding… there’s more to building a barn than growing a field of turnips is all I’m sayin.

    • setsubyou@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      17
      ·
      1 day ago

      Tbh I think teaching 6502 assembly would be a great idea. You can learn the basics of how computers work without having to deal with all the complexity of a computer from 2026.

    • FirstCircle@lemmy.ml
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      2
      ·
      20 hours ago

      6502 assembly language

      Z80 would be good too. The kids should be able to implement the instruction set on a breadboard by intuition alone. There’s something wrong with the teachers and Big School if the kids don’t have it running CP/M by the end of the school year, preferably with a working port of Hack.

    • tal@lemmy.today
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      11
      arrow-down
      22
      ·
      1 day ago

      Youth of today are a failure. They neither show the initiative to adopt new and improved practices the way we broke from those of our parents’ generation, nor the wisdom to recognize that our generation’s ways are the correct ones and should be followed to the letter.

      • Deceptichum@quokk.au
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        18
        arrow-down
        1
        ·
        1 day ago

        Youth of today are some of the most forward thinking empathetic no nonsense people around.

        I love the younger generations, their compassion and humanity is leagues ahead of their predecessors.

        Anyone who shits on them is a failure.

        • AnarchistArtificer@slrpnk.net
          link
          fedilink
          English
          arrow-up
          1
          ·
          7 hours ago

          Yeah, I share your view. I wish that the youth of today could have grown up in a better world than I did, but unfortunately for most, that’s not the case. Sure, there are some things that are better, but by and large, young people are facing so much hard stuff. In spite of that (and perhaps even because of that), I have seen so many of them who are deeply caring and engaged in politics.