You must log in or # to comment.
mood
❯ sudo apt show happiness N: Unable to locate package happiness N: Unable to locate package happiness E: No packages foundon which distro does it say “whom”?
% kill Usage: kill [options] <pid> [...] Options: <pid> [...] send signal to every <pid> listed -<signal>, -s, --signal <signal> specify the <signal> to be sent -q, --queue <value> integer value to be sent with the signal -l, --list=[<signal>] list all signal names, or convert one to a name -L, --table list all signal names in a nice table -h, --help display this help and exit -V, --version output version information and exit For more details see kill(1).sudo dnf install love!!! Also known as the Balatro / Blue Revolver engine
And this is why Linux needs age verification! Won’t somebody please think of the children?!
Actually, maybe it would be better, if certain people thought of the children less.
More is less.
touch pptouch catman dateman mount( ͡° ͜ʖ ͡°)
Cat looks unhappy. This incident will be reported
Haha hes a very happy kitty. He loves being touched in almost every way.
Mrrrrrp >w<
bash cat
unzip; touch; strip; finger; mount; gasp; yes; uptime; umount; sleepgawk
error: not unzipped yetdeflating ego.zip@certified_expert @WanderingThoughts bomb.zip
That caught me off guard
deleted by creator
Alternatively finger <target username>
killis a command.love,happiness, andpeaceare not commands.You can totally find
loveusing commandsudo apt install love. It’s a game engine.happinessis a Perl module insidelibdemeter-perlpackage. Let’s not install Perl modules, there lies insanity.And you can find
peacein a whole bunch of packages, it’s an icon of the peace symbol.Love (proper name LÖVE) is the game framework that Balatro uses 😉
I’ve got search queries on “how to kill orphaned child” or something like that. I’m sure it set off some flags.
Ask an american or their pet LLM, they’re pretty good at that these days
kill ALL
$humans --except=“Fry”
We can get them for you wholesale.
The original SLAPS
Yes officer, this guy over there.
forced consent
$ no bash: no: command not found $ yes y y y y y ...$ yes n n n n n n n ...I kind of want to go back in time and make it so that the original
yesalways printed the first letter of the name it was called by. That way you could symlink any name you like to it and it would do the right thing. Called asnoit would printns, etc. The optional parameter would still be there for longer strings or alternate uses.The reason time travel would be needed is that there’s bound to be, or have been, someone who has done something weird regarding symlinking
yesthat relies on it always printingywhen it has no parameter, and the name trick would be a breaking change.yes always printed the first letter of the name it was called by
you mean like
yes "$(whoami | cut -c1)"?I’m going to assume you’re not kidding, in which case, no, I mean the first letter of the command name it was called by.
There are already commands that do this. For example, on my machine,
exis the head of a symlink chain that leads to thevimtext editor’s executable and if I runex,vimwill know that it was started with the nameexand will start inexmode.exwas an editor that worked in a different way but wasvim’s ancestor, so backwards compatibility is built right in for those strange people who loveex, (or have some kind of automation reliance on it being present).Usually, the main command has a command line option that achieves the same effect as the special name. Here,
vim -eis the less clever way to startviminexmode.For
yes, symlinking the namenoto it and then calling that should arguably cause it to printnrepeatedly, but it doesn’t, for historical reasons, hence my suggestion to go back in time and make it act differently.(None of this touches on the fact that the GNU philosophy wants nothing to do with clever tricks like this. They prefer to compile separate executables for each and every use case. For example, most Linuxes have
dirandvdiras variants of thelscommand. Their functionality could have been implemented through this symlink trick, but instead there are three near-identical executables taking up space instead.)
Or make your own package? call it
affirm(more wholesome), write it in Rust (of course), and take onyes.yesn’t
The penguin ain’t messing around no more.
Sources for the images I slapped together: The penguin is from an article on the Indianapolis zoo, and the rest is the cover image from John Wick taken from the Lionsgate page on the movie.
Kudos, for not making slop using a clanker.
It’s more fun making the crappy photoshop images myself (Though I use GIMP not photoshop because fuck Adobe)
Not to mention there’s no ethical or moral concerns when making them
Other than Ethical and Moral concerns
-
AI generated images looks like shit.
-
Images you edited yourself has its own charm to it.
-
You get more control over whateber you create.
I hate when people say AI is just a tool like pencil, while it’s trained with billions and billions of stolen and pirated images and all one do is type in a couple prompts which is far from whatever human creativity is capable of by itself.
-
deleted by creator
I’ve got to agree with you now that I found a good Tux image to edit.
deleted by creator
bashkill output:kill: usage: kill [-s sigspec | -n signum | -sigspec] pid | jobspec … or kill -l [sigspec]
fishkill output:kill: not enough arguments
With fish, you just need to fight more to earn that kill.
Ha! On Ubuntu, the OS of Love, you get:
manxu@ubuntu:~ love Command 'love' not found, but can be installed with: sudo snap install love # version 11.2+pkg-d332, or sudo apt install love # version 11.4-1 See 'snap info love' for additional versions.Have you heard about Our Lord and Savior: Jesux
Also, we are seriously considering changing some fundamental OS features. The idea would be that function calls and features suggesting evil and otherwise pagan ideas would be changed.
abort(3)
kill(1)
references to “daemon”
I cannot avoid reading that as “Je-sucks”
Cue the joke about killing children with a fork.
That’s not
nice
