• chonglibloodsport@lemmy.world
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    25
    ·
    7 hours ago

    Really surprised to hear they have sales tax on ALL food, not just packaged stuff or restaurant food! Not sure what the rationale is for that.

  • Ryoae@piefed.social
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    30
    arrow-down
    2
    ·
    10 hours ago

    State Sen. Mary Elizabeth Coleman, an Arnold Republican, said the bill is an attempt to increase affordability for Missourians as prices rise.

    Read that over and over again, Missourians.

    • thesmokingman@programming.dev
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      4
      arrow-down
      1
      ·
      5 hours ago

      Yeah fuck the bill’s sponsor and her desire to reduce costs for a family of four by $50 every month

      State Sen. Mary Elizabeth Coleman, an Arnold Republican, said the bill is an attempt to increase affordability for Missourians as prices rise.

      “Missourians are paying more and more for necessities,” Coleman said. “Most of us agree fundamentally that essential services should not be funded on the backs of the poor.”

      Coleman said a family of four would save $54 per month with the removal of grocery sales tax.

      • Kjell@lemmy.world
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        1
        ·
        48 minutes ago

        It’s nice to try to reduce the cost for the citizens but with less tax money some other tax needs to be increased or some service will have to save money.

        Dimmitt also said that because the bulk of property taxes go to schools and other jurisdictions, local governments rely on sales taxes to fund police and fire departments, road repairs, trash and recycling, among many other services.

    • flandish@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      13
      ·
      9 hours ago

      poor and hungry people will work for much less wage than people with proper nutrition and savings accounts.

  • bleistift2@sopuli.xyz
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    15
    arrow-down
    8
    ·
    9 hours ago

    Tax cuts only benefit corporations. They already price their goods at the maximum that consumers will (read: are able to) pay. Guess what happens if consumers can suddenly pay 10% more because they don’t have to pay 10% tax?

    • spaghettiwestern@sh.itjust.works
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      1
      ·
      edit-2
      1 minute ago

      So the opposite must be true too right? When taxes go way up companies drop their prices to compensate because according to you they only charge what consumers can pay. Except that doesn’t happen at all. Instead tariffs caused prices to go way up and continue to do so.

      What complete nonsense.

    • Paranoidfactoid@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      4
      ·
      4 hours ago

      No. There is nuance to the tax cut and tax levy argument. Circumstances matter. Cutting taxes on groceries would immediately lower food prices for everyone, the poor included.

      • Pup Biru@aussie.zone
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        3
        ·
        1 hour ago

        one of the things i love about australian taxes: by law the displayed price must include all taxes… the price on the label/menu/sign/website/whatever is the price you pay… by law

        always catches me out in the US adding tax and tip 😓 i end up spending way more than i’d intended and having a far worse experience because of it