• Vogi@piefed.social
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    4
    ·
    11 hours ago

    The headline is a bit misleading is it not? There is no evidence of children’s data being used unlawfully. (I mean there might I don’t know what counts as “unlawful”) This is just a fine for Reddit not to follow UKs dystopian ideas in time.

    • Echo Dot@feddit.uk
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      2
      ·
      9 hours ago

      They were relying on users to click I am definitely over 18. So there is by definition no possible way to know if children’s data was being misused except to the extent it obviously was.

      Age verification should have been a device side thing. I should be able to set up my kids phone / tablet with their date of birth and if they’re not old enough then they can’t access certain content. That way the only person who needs to verify the age of someone is me.

      My ISP shipped with age restriction on by default, (personally I think that’s a stupid default but that’s a separate issue), but although annoying it was easy to get rid of because I’m the account holder. I didn’t have to scan my ID though.

      Anyway we all know this has been nothing to do with kids anyway.

  • CaptainBasculin@lemmy.dbzer0.com
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    1
    ·
    11 hours ago

    This headline is about them not complying with age verification, which is something I’d agree with. Fuck reddit overall but not their fault in this regard

  • chaotic_ugly@lemmy.zip
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    8
    ·
    edit-2
    12 hours ago

    Spez is such a colossal Zuckerberg-wannabe piece of shit. I don’t think any site has fallen farther than Reddit has. What a waste.

  • SleepyPie@lemmy.world
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    26
    ·
    1 day ago

    A silly noble once said,

    “If the penalty for a crime is a fine, then that law only exists for the lower class.”

    Business criminals need to be barred from business, and criminal profits returned to the public.

  • GreenTara@lemmy.world
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    19
    ·
    1 day ago

    Really waiting for the mass exodus from reddit. It seems like it’s gotten pretty shitty over there the past year or so.

    • nukeforyou@lemmy.zip
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      4
      ·
      1 day ago

      it kinda sucks tho that all my google searches for tech support I have to put site:reddit.com at the end because the rest of the web is shit for support

        • The Quuuuuill@slrpnk.net
          link
          fedilink
          English
          arrow-up
          1
          ·
          11 hours ago

          software projects run by gamerz: hosted on discord

          also software projects run by gamerz: why is the support channel the same 3 questions over and over again!?

          idk, maybe it’s that you host your software support on a platform without discoverability of solutions?

          aT lEaSt It’S nOt A fOrUm

  • lyralycan@sh.itjust.works
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    142
    arrow-down
    3
    ·
    edit-2
    2 days ago

    As much as I hate Reddit this is just continuation of the UK government steamrolling and destroying the free Internet, ruining the adult experience.

    One of the wonders of the Internet was that it was wildly unregulated - if you wanted it and you could disable safesearch you could get it, with the caveat of ISP-enforced content locks on all mobile data subscriptions under the name of a legal child (under 18), workplace and school security and filters, unremovable Safesearch on most search engines etc. Broadband required an adult, who in turn could activate parental controls. I couldnt wait until I turned 18 so I could finally access many sites for porn, news, gaming, forums and anything containing keywords without being blocked. I had a list of proxies for bypassing school filters.

    In short there is significant existing protection in place and we know that this is simply more evidence of Orwellian enforcement.

    • a_non_monotonic_function@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      11
      arrow-down
      15
      ·
      2 days ago

      The unregulated internet had literal child porn sites that were available to anyone.

      I don’t disagree with some of your points but the “wild West” internet shouldn’t exist in society.

      • 87Six@lemmy.zip
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        20
        arrow-down
        1
        ·
        1 day ago

        And how the fuck, exactly, are their new laws preventing CP sites from existing?

      • lyralycan@sh.itjust.works
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        14
        arrow-down
        1
        ·
        2 days ago

        Well yes, the more CSAM detection and predator hunting, the better. Task forces and, dare I say it, detection programs with algorithms that may or may not include AI learning, are invaluable to eliminating the actually terrible stuff, anything that can’t even be educational.

        I believe the Online Safety Act and Chat Control’s sections that tie every user’s real identity to their online actions is not a solution, because when that data gets leaked and/or abused many innocent lives are in danger. I trust the state very little. I trust unidentified malicious hackers even less.

        • IsoKiero@sopuli.xyz
          link
          fedilink
          English
          arrow-up
          5
          ·
          1 day ago

          Leaked data doesn’t even need to be dangerous to life. I, like many others, don’t have “nothing to hide”, but I don’t still want my real name next to a list of content I’ve watched from streaming sites. Also I don’t really want my identity tied to this pseudonym, or any other accounts on any platform. There’s a crapload of problems and it would be a heaven for scammers if there was no way to stay at least relatively anonymous around the net.

      • MinnesotaGoddam@lemmy.world
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        2
        arrow-down
        3
        ·
        1 day ago

        okay so, first, were the CSAM websites illegal then? is the issue you see one of enforcement, not how the laws are written?

        • a_non_monotonic_function@lemmy.world
          link
          fedilink
          English
          arrow-up
          3
          arrow-down
          2
          ·
          1 day ago

          Yes, it has been illegal for quite some time. I’m guessing you are on the younger side?

          I’m the 90s clicking a link, even one with a legit looking url, could be a rather risky proposition. On slashdot and the like many of us would deliberately avoid many random links unless someone else commented about it first.

              • MinnesotaGoddam@lemmy.world
                link
                fedilink
                English
                arrow-up
                3
                arrow-down
                1
                ·
                1 day ago

                the text only music forums i was on in the 90s strangely didn’t have any problems with csam. it’s all where you congregate.

                • paul@lemmy.org
                  link
                  fedilink
                  English
                  arrow-up
                  3
                  ·
                  1 day ago

                  To be honest it probably did. There’s a whole army of broken heroes behind every social media site whose job it is to block and remove that kind of content. If you didn’t see anything, thank the admins.

                  The problem with the kinds of people who are into that kind of stuff is that they want to shove it under your nose to make you uncomfortable.

                • a_non_monotonic_function@lemmy.world
                  link
                  fedilink
                  English
                  arrow-up
                  1
                  arrow-down
                  2
                  ·
                  edit-2
                  1 day ago

                  Lol, you don’t understand the internet, good person, but you are the physical embodiment of its current base.

                  Step 1: Call fraud on a legitimate claim from someone who was there at the time.

                  Step 2: Boast about your long, prolific history on the Internet to establish your credentials.

                  Step 3: Double back because you stayed an a strangely singular lane, and as @paul points out, still avoiding getting it.

                  Keep on keeping on, I guess.

  • abbiistabbii@piefed.blahaj.zone
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    74
    arrow-down
    2
    ·
    2 days ago

    Oh I’m sorry, which government demanded age checks which made kids give away their data to check their ages? Oh yeah.

  • julysfire@lemmy.world
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    33
    arrow-down
    1
    ·
    2 days ago

    Cost of doing business to them. Make fines actually hurt and then maybe something will change.

    • Tja@programming.dev
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      4
      ·
      1 day ago

      Because of content. I still can’t find woodworking, amarthome, soccer or F1 content or lemmy, just to name a few. I lurk in incognito mode on reddit for that, so the ads don’t have any data about me.

  • Canaconda@lemmy.ca
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    65
    arrow-down
    12
    ·
    2 days ago

    /u/Spez (creator of /r/jailbait) should be in the car next to Andrew and on the gallows next to Trumpstein.

    • Zak@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      21
      arrow-down
      2
      ·
      2 days ago

      It was created by Violentacrez, not spez.

      Prior to late 2012, it was possible to make someone a moderator of a subreddit without their consent, which was sometimes done as a joke or harassment. That’s why spez was briefly a moderator of r/jailbait.

      • Canaconda@lemmy.ca
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        2
        arrow-down
        1
        ·
        1 day ago

        Fair point! But he still created a website that allowed that kind of content and is a POS human that deserves what he gets.

        • Zak@lemmy.world
          link
          fedilink
          English
          arrow-up
          6
          arrow-down
          1
          ·
          1 day ago

          I must also point out that he did not work at Reddit between 2009 and 2015.

          I’m not going to try to talk you out of hating spez, but maybe try hating him for something he actually did.

          • Canaconda@lemmy.ca
            link
            fedilink
            English
            arrow-up
            2
            ·
            1 day ago

            Not sure what that timeframe has to do with anything. I hate him for his role in reddit.

            • MinnesotaGoddam@lemmy.world
              link
              fedilink
              English
              arrow-up
              2
              arrow-down
              1
              ·
              1 day ago

              reddit was created in 2005, so (and please forgive the rounding errors i do not like mathing before coffee OH CRAP) spez worked there for four years, then took six years off, then worked there again? whatever that means.

              • Canaconda@lemmy.ca
                link
                fedilink
                English
                arrow-up
                1
                arrow-down
                1
                ·
                1 day ago

                I know that. Not sure why you guys think that’s relevant. He still created reddit and manages it now.

    • blackn1ght@feddit.uk
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      32
      arrow-down
      3
      ·
      2 days ago

      I’m not defending the guy but wasn’t it that a mod of that subreddit added him as a mod as a joke? I don’t think spez created it.

        • blackn1ght@feddit.uk
          link
          fedilink
          English
          arrow-up
          25
          arrow-down
          2
          ·
          2 days ago

          It was always the version of events that I’ve read.

          I just did a quick search and found this, a video claiming that he was a mod, but the majority of comments indicate it’s not true and that it was debunked.

          • pelespirit@sh.itjust.works
            link
            fedilink
            English
            arrow-up
            9
            arrow-down
            14
            ·
            2 days ago

            Spez actually owns site where majority of comments stick up for said owner? Sorry man, that ain’t proof. Wtf are you sticking up for spez anyway? I don’t know anyone sane that would.

            • Zagorath@aussie.zone
              link
              fedilink
              English
              arrow-up
              26
              arrow-down
              4
              ·
              2 days ago

              He was a mod for a while, but not the top mod. Top mod is the creator, unless the creator quits, passing it off to second mod. And he was mod at a time when anyone could be added as a mod without their consent. No need to accept an invite.

              It’s bad enough that he was happy to let the subreddit exist for as long as it did even after significant on-site pressure to remove it. The same thing he did half a decade later with the_Donald. The fact that it took mainstream media criticism to be willing to take it down should be scathing enough. We don’t need to make up bs.

              • Test_Tickles@lemmy.world
                link
                fedilink
                English
                arrow-up
                4
                arrow-down
                5
                ·
                2 days ago

                Hoffman was a founder of Reddit, he was a part of the very creation of the site. He also had absolute and unlimited access to every bit of data that reddit ever had or created. He was also well known for editing other people’s comments for his own amusement and narcissism. He not only could have easily been the creator, but he could have been the very mod who made his other account “a mod as a joke”. He definitely could have removed himself as a mod of jb just as easily as any of the other well known edits he did to Reddit. And he definitely had direct and unfettered access to every single photo that was ever uploaded or linked to Reddit, even the ones that were so illegal that even the jailbait mods took them down.
                So, the other guys opinion that Hoffman was the head pedo and creator of jailbait is just as valid and verifiable as your opinion that it was a joke that he nothing to do with it.

                • Zagorath@aussie.zone
                  link
                  fedilink
                  English
                  arrow-up
                  6
                  ·
                  2 days ago

                  Hoffman was the head pedo and creator of jailbait is just as valid

                  No, it is not.

                  your opinion that it was a joke that he nothing to do with it

                  Not the opinion I expressed.

            • blackn1ght@feddit.uk
              link
              fedilink
              English
              arrow-up
              16
              arrow-down
              1
              ·
              2 days ago

              Well where’s the proof that he created it? I’ll happily stand corrected.

              I just think that if we’re going to attack someone, it’s probably a good idea to use facts that are true and not made up (it’s likely that op just misremembered the details) otherwise it just puts doubt on any further valid points. I’ve no interest in defending the guy but I do think we should try and keep our facts straight when we criticise someone.

              • mannycalavera@feddit.uk
                link
                fedilink
                English
                arrow-up
                8
                arrow-down
                2
                ·
                2 days ago

                I just think that if we’re going to attack someone, it’s probably a good idea to use facts that are true and not made up

                Err … sir. Do you understand how the internet works? “Facts”? “Truth”? “Not made up”? These are not things a shit poster craves.

    • taiyang@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      9
      ·
      2 days ago

      Ironically, Huffman doesn’t seem to be in the Epstein files. This isn’t because he isn’t a pedophile-- he very likely is-- but he simply wasn’t important enough of a person for them to invite him or even talk about him.

      • Canaconda@lemmy.ca
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        11
        ·
        2 days ago

        4chan had approximately 10x the users as reddit did in 2011 when Epstein and Poole connected.

        But ya fuck u/spez. Even the biggest losers on earth hate u/spez

    • FinjaminPoach@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      11
      arrow-down
      5
      ·
      2 days ago

      /u/Spez (creator of /r/jailbait)

      oh 🫣 I’ve probably heard that before but I must not have committed it to memory

      Well that explains why Reddit was so ridiculously pro-porn and porn-riddled in general.

      • Zagorath@aussie.zone
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        21
        ·
        2 days ago

        That’s cos it’s not true. He was a mod of it for a while, but I’ve not seen any verification of how long that was, and it was at a time when you could just add someone as a mod without them needing to approve it. But he was definitely not its founder.

        He did allow it to stick around until the mainstream media started kicking up a fuss about it. That would be bad enough. We don’t need to make shit up.