The thing is if space-based manufacturing became the norm then it would cease to be impractical to implement regulations and oversight. The reason it’s difficult to do now is because getting to spaces difficult, but for space-based manufacturing to be feasible that problem already has to be solved.
I’m just confused about what products can be manufactured completely autonomously, in a 0G environment, and are profitable enough to make space-based manufacture economical.
I mean. I’ve used AI to write my job mandated end of year self assessment report. I don’t care about this, it’s not like they’ll give me a pay rise so I’m not putting effort into it.
The AI says I’ve lead a project related to windows 11 updates. I haven’t but it looks accurate and no one else will be able to dell it’s fake.
So I guess the reason is they are using the AI to talk about subjects they can’t fact check. So it looks accurate.
Training and therapy absolutely. But this is about empathy, they are claiming the people are more empathetic when they experience a situation in VR than if they haven’t experienced that situation ever in any medium.
I don’t believe they’ve demonstrated that.
At best they’ve demonstrated the people are empathetic but they might be anyway. They definitely haven’t demonstrated that that’s a result of the VR experience. To do that they would have had to have taken some sort of test both before and after the VR experience to see if their attitudes have changed.
Training and therapy are appropriate uses for VR because they don’t need to demonstrate that they are better than real world alternatives, because the benefit they have is cost. They are cheaper in VR than they are in the real world, that’s the only metric they need to pass.
I did read it. It’s very very long though have you read all of it, I started to get bored when they started showing really complicated diagrams with no real explanation as to how they came to those conclusions.
Social studies is like that, it’s very much couched in the sort of science that you would normally expect of physics or engineering but all it’s conclusions are fuzzy but they come out with these concrete graphs to explain very personal responses. I find it to be intellectually dishonest to suggest that you can represent the world like that
You need to learn what sociopath means.
This is a dumb test. How people react in VR is not relevant to the real world.
Where did I make that arguement.
VR is not the real world. It’s not the holiday so you can’t turn off safety protocols to simulate real world threats.
They didn’t switch genders because that wasn’t the purpose of the study.
The purpose of the study being to get the results they wanted to get. That’s not science.
It’s basically a study of “do people like being assaulted”. No one does regardless of gender, but they took that as women don’t like being assaulted and men pretending to be women don’t like being assaulted. Therefore men pretending to be women in VR don’t like to be assaulted.
What sort of conclusion is that.
Oh this is such nonsense.
They basically decided “what if we tested a scenario that has been happening in ChatVR for about 10 years.”
When I play a shooting game in VR I don’t think I’m going to die, I do not experience fear. Any claims along those lines are at best overstated and at worst straight up lies.
Also what’s this research supposed to prove anyway?
I still don’t accept the fundamental core point of the arguement which is that rust necessarily makes it impossible to commit certain errors. Rust has its rules as such as only programming language does but that doesn’t mean that mistakes are impossible.
The vast majority of errors are logic errors not memory leaks in standard functions.
So you’re one of those basics that believes in the whole alpha male thing are you. You know thats marketing BS meant to get idiots to buy protein powder.
Wow this is so revolutionary.
Never in the history of the internet has music been available for free.
Oh so they’re going to open their own fab are they?
Their solution to the RAM shortage problem is for the RAM shortage problem to in fact not exist. Obviously that doesn’t work.
I’m completely confused by why they seem to think it’s impossible to have coding errors in rust. I’m also confused as to why they seem to think that errors are actually a problem. You get them you fix them. Who cares about what language you do it in.
This stinks of somebody who’s been in the industry for about 2 years and now thinks they’re hot shit.
So there is apparently a problem with languages such as JavaScript and the solution is to use languages such as TypeScript.
Wut?
Because they currently contribute so much.
Actually Larry page may or may not be absolutely fine, I’ve never heard of him before.
I don’t understand how the car wash mode is supposed to protect the electronics. Does the water do what it’s told as long as there is the right setting?
Surely all the criminals need to do is just wait until it rains and then commit crimes. As long as they escape through a shallow puddle the cyber truck will be unable to follow.
It’s still the same amount of mass. It doesn’t get lighter because you ship it as it’s component parts.
You know what you are absolutely right — Organisations are indeed falling for what is known as the doorman fallacy: reducing rich and complex human roles to a single task and replacing people with AI. This overlooks the nuanced interactions and adaptability humans bring to their work.