• heartSagan5@lemmy.zip
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    4
    ·
    2 hours ago

    Wasn’t this protected by the State because alleged DoD application? This is one of many reasons we cut it with England, just saying.

  • rose56@lemmy.zip
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    2
    ·
    4 hours ago

    The sheep’s are sleeping, no one will do something about this. Welcome to the reality.

  • IEatDaFeesh@lemmy.world
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    20
    ·
    8 hours ago

    It’s sad that the norm is to expect those in power will try to ruin lives as fast and as efficiently as possible. Just why… They have billions of dollars already… Why

    • InputZero@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      3
      ·
      3 hours ago

      Because they’re in a race against each other that they can never win. Elon Musk may have gotten a little wiggle room from his competition when SpaceX went public but you can bet your ass (cause I know all of you don’t have a dollar to waste) Larry Page is running his brain ragged trying to think about how he becomes the most powerful one. It’s just a pissing contest and unfortunately they’re really careless

    • youmaynotknow@lemmy.zip
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      3
      ·
      7 hours ago

      I ask myself the same question. It feels like such an empty life. More and more money that they would need many lifetimes to be able to spend, which will be worth absolutely useless if and when they end up fucking up the whole world. It doesn’t make sense at all. Yes, it’s nice to have money to buy whatever you want, I won’t argue that, but come on. At this point I’m leaning towards them just having so much fucking ego that they can’t stop anymore. If anyone has another possible explanation, I’d really like to know.

  • ReHomed@lemmy.cafe
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    24
    ·
    15 hours ago

    I have a suspicion they put the gas turbines near those communities specifically to fuck with them the same way they bulldozed poor neighborhoods for roads

      • heartSagan5@lemmy.zip
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        2
        ·
        2 hours ago

        Yup, the “penalty costs” are just costs of doing business. And the richer they get, the less impactful the penalty is so it gets easier to write off.

    • kunaltyagi@programming.dev
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      2
      arrow-down
      9
      ·
      12 hours ago

      Not really. If he has permissions for a temporary install, it is above board. He just needs to get a permanent permit before moving to a long term generator instead of temporary fixes.

      Should the permissions have been blocked? Now that’s a diff question

      • chewypoops@lemmy.world
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        13
        ·
        9 hours ago

        So you’re just going to parrot Elon Musk’s public statement about why he doesn’t need permission? Get outta here!

        He has more than 2x as many turbines than is allowed for a temporary install. The article makes it abundantly clear that these things are illegal.

        Musk doesn’t have permission to do this, no matter what excuse he gives.

    • AA5B@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      4
      arrow-down
      10
      ·
      20 hours ago

      While I hate being cold to peoples suffering, didn’t most of them vote for the face eating leopard party. They asked for their corporate overlords personal profit to be protected from their lungs, their environment, any consideration. They asked for billionaires to be above the law.

      They are clearly being wronged here, there should be heavy fines, shutdowns and even jail time but my empathy is in short supply

      • RaoulDook@lemmy.world
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        1
        ·
        4 hours ago

        About 40% of Mississippi voters voted for Kamala Harris. Additionally, about 38% of the state’s residents are black.

      • funksoulkitchen@lemmy.zip
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        1
        ·
        4 hours ago

        Just because they voted for a leopard to eat their face, doesn’t mean they deserve to have their face eaten

      • Uriel238 [all pronouns]@lemmy.blahaj.zone
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        7
        ·
        17 hours ago

        Blacks typically vote mostly for Democrats while whites typically vote for Republicans. So black neighborhoods are commonly not getting representation.

        Mississippi is about as Jim Crow as it can possibly be, so it doesn’t surprise me if white supremacist elected officials are pushed into office via gerrymandering, voter suppression and election tampering.

      • nevyn@slrpnk.net
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        5
        arrow-down
        5
        ·
        19 hours ago

        The other side of the duopoly would be doing the same, they both need to be removed.

        • i_am_not_a_robot@discuss.tchncs.de
          link
          fedilink
          English
          arrow-up
          1
          ·
          17 hours ago

          People are downvoting because they can’t reconcile one side being better than the other with both sides being bad. Is sacrificing citizens for AI companies a partisan issue? Does the mainstream democratic party oppose the unsustainable construction of data centers and what happens to people near those data centers?

  • Eddbopkins@lemmy.world
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    28
    ·
    1 day ago

    people did that work, just because elon musk tells people what to do doesn’t mean those people should be exonerated from the consequences as well. the people doing the work sure as shit falls out there ass, know there was no permit. if there no permit, then why not a great fire ball in the night sky.

    • Lyrac@programming.dev
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      2
      arrow-down
      3
      ·
      8 hours ago

      I agree, Elon is not at fault here. All he did was finance it with enough money to convince people to ignore the law.

      • bthest@lemmy.world
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        2
        ·
        3 hours ago

        Paying someone to do a crime is the same as doing the crime.

        Cause —>Effect.

        • Lyrac@programming.dev
          link
          fedilink
          English
          arrow-up
          1
          ·
          21 minutes ago

          Sorry, my sarcasm did not translate through text. I was trying to poke at the original commenters shifting of blame from Elon to the people that he hired

    • architect@thelemmy.club
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      7
      ·
      20 hours ago

      Yea I’m not sure why this isn’t the normal way to think. The logic of “they are just doing a job and getting theirs” doesn’t hold up for everything so where is the line for these people?

      Oh shucks i see you’ve signed up to drag me to the death camp! Not your fault! You’re just getting yours! Now let me be polite and handcuff myself!

      We need to be more serious.

    • minorkeys@sh.itjust.works
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      5
      ·
      20 hours ago

      At some point participation is complicity but unless we make it hostile to work with, for, or in the interests of these inhuman monsters, people won’t know not to. Labour is not in a position to know what work is illegal or not.

      Working for the wealthy needs to be seen as a threat against society. It’s deeply anti-social. We have no way to differentiate them in their range of evil, and they made it impossible to find out. So at some point, to protect the working, poor and middle classes, if you’re wealthy, you’re a threat. Don’t want to be treated as a threat? Give up your wealth and join the peasantry. We need to police our own to protect ourselves from the threat of wealth.

    • deft@lemmy.wtf
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      8
      ·
      23 hours ago

      Yes. I’m pretty sure it’s a contractor’s job to get the permits. Is it not?

      Not removing blame from Elon. Just smearing the blame around cause all those fucks are responsible

    • electric_nan@lemmy.ml
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      5
      ·
      17 hours ago

      Prolly get filtered out. I was thinking cans of expanding foam (ie, "great stuff) with an m80 duct taped to it. Light it up, chuck it in.

      • bthest@lemmy.world
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        2
        ·
        3 hours ago

        One of those fell in my washing machine when I wasn’t looking and it got emptied during the cycle.

        Ruined my clothes and the machine wasn’t happy about it but it eventually worked fine after a few cleaning cycles.

        The “liquid nails” type of expanding foam however, I’m pretty sure that would fuck up anything.

          • Corkyskog@sh.itjust.works
            link
            fedilink
            English
            arrow-up
            2
            ·
            8 hours ago

            I mean I assume the great stuff would leave the can after you huck it into the turbine, but if you’re worried it won’t be punctured, you could just duct tape down the trigger on the can before you huck it.

  • melsaskca@lemmy.ca
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    95
    ·
    1 day ago

    One man harming thousands. Sounds like a crime that would be punishable by death in olden times.

    • ChickenLadyLovesLife@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      50
      ·
      1 day ago

      There was an incident in South Korea some years ago where a greedy developer built an apartment building with substandard concrete; the building later collapsed and killed a few hundred people. The guy was tried and convicted and as he was being frog-marched to his sentencing hearing, friends and relatives of the victims were coming out of the crowd and beating him while his escorts just looked away.

      It’s really enjoyable to imagine that happening here in the US, but then it’s enjoyable to imagine winning the lottery, too.

    • 1984@lemmy.today
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      19
      ·
      1 day ago

      People like this would be shot. People would group together and hire gunmen to get rid of criminals in the old west.

      Of course their security was just a few body guards and that’s it. Nobody was living in high tech buildings separate from everyone else.

  • NewNewAugustEast@lemmy.zip
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    15
    ·
    1 day ago

    They are just going to call it another “Sacrifice Zone” like they do the cancer alley in Louisiana arent they?

    Some people just are expendable for progress, what can the country do?

  • fizzle@quokk.au
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    46
    ·
    1 day ago

    Im sure the American legal system will get those wheels of justice spinning on this in a few years.

    • potoooooooo 🥔@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      19
      arrow-down
      2
      ·
      1 day ago

      No, but Julia Roberts and Meryl Streep will win hella Oscars playing the plucky white women who “take them down.”

    • chiliedogg@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      11
      ·
      1 day ago

      My city finally got a court order against a billionaire for unpermitted building that allows us to bulldoze his house. Just took 7 years in court to get the ruling…

      And instead of bulldozing the house, we were able to use the court order to strongarm them into fixing their site so it no longer damages the environment, their neighbors, or city infrastructure.

      The upside for the city there (aside from having to bid out and manage a major project in-house) is that we get a lot more tax revenue from a house that is brought into compliance than a scarred, demolished site.

    • wasabi_noir@lemmy.zip
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      16
      arrow-down
      2
      ·
      1 day ago

      Along with any dipshit using AI to begin with. As much of a complete piece of shit as musk is (and he is a HUGE piece of shit), the end users of this shit share in the blame too. Any idiot using grok or whatever the fuck anthropic call their horseshit are culpable.

      • XLE@piefed.social
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        4
        arrow-down
        2
        ·
        1 day ago

        To a proportionate degree yes, but AI is being shoved down the throats of workers and subsidized by the companies providing it too. I have some sympathy for the clueless grandma, or the person who’s genuinely lost their mind thanks to this.

        • wasabi_noir@lemmy.zip
          link
          fedilink
          English
          arrow-up
          2
          arrow-down
          1
          ·
          1 day ago

          I have zero sympathy for the willfully ignorant. There’s more than enough information and evidence that this shit is horrible on many fronts, and anyone who has managed to ignore it is toeing into dangerously stupid territory. Making excuses for dumb assholes is how we’ve ended up with the stupidest cunts ever running things.

          • XLE@piefed.social
            link
            fedilink
            English
            arrow-up
            5
            ·
            23 hours ago

            Dario Amodei is the one renting out the servers while pretending to he’s the Wholesome Ethical AI Guy. His behavior is nearly on par with Musk here.

            I’m much more interested in him (behavior that’s extremely intentional, with the added slime of being deceptive and yet enjoying a ton of undeserved, fawning PR) than the average clueless Meemaw. Similar to many other trash systems, you have to look at the people maintaining the system, not the people using it.