• theunknownmuncher@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      12
      ·
      16 days ago

      Without reverse engineering, there is no security. No way to find new bugs and vulnerabilities or confirm it’s backdoor free. Just blind trust only.

    • CosmicTurtle0 [he/him]@lemmy.dbzer0.com
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      4
      ·
      16 days ago

      Reverse engineering prohibitions are the dumbest things.

      Let’s say I do this. Arduino sues me. Okay. Now what? What money are they going to take?

      Hell, this would be a perfect time for everyone to form an LLC and purchase Arduinos as the LLC and then release your research under your corporate name as CC0. If your LLC has no revenue, you as an individual are legally protected.

      Arduino can try to put the genie back in the bottle but good luck.

      Better companies than Arduino have tried to prevent hardware reverse engineering and have failed. Apple being the biggest company I can think of that have tried to sue people for releasing schematics of their motherboards.

      • matlag@sh.itjust.works
        link
        fedilink
        arrow-up
        3
        ·
        16 days ago

        They can’t take your money but they can bury you into the ground and use you as an example so that no one ever tries to do the same thing. Ever heard of Aaron Schwartz?

    • psud@aussie.zone
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      0
      arrow-down
      1
      ·
      16 days ago

      It’s still legal in Australia, at least, we never got the anti-circumvention rule the US media companies got into the US trade agreements

      Or rather we did, but they have exceptions that cover just about every otherwise legal use case. I can legally decrypt media to play on my Linux machine, for example. I think the only thing we can’t legally do is circumvent controls to do copyright violation

  • IrateAnteater@sh.itjust.works
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    4
    ·
    16 days ago

    Maybe it’s just what I’ve been noticing, but I feel like Arduino was already losing its share of the hobbyist market. The plethora of small, cheap esp32 devices have already been taking Arduino’s place.

      • SatyrSack@quokk.au
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        1
        ·
        16 days ago

        Odd that the newer RP2350 has a lower clock speed, while being improved in most other respects. Is that why the RP2040 is still seemingly the community preference?

        Feature RP2040 RP2350
        Package QFN-56EP QFN-60EP or QFN-80EP
        CPU Cores 2 × ARM Cortex-M0+ 2 × ARM Cortex-M33 (w/FPU), 2 × Hazard3 RISC-V
        CPU Clock 200 MHz[5] 150 MHz
        SRAM 264 KB, 6 banks 520 KB, 10 banks
        Flash None None (RP2350), 2 MB (RP2354)
        OTP None 8 KB
        DMA 12 chan, 2 IRQ 16 chan, 4 IRQ
        PIO 2 (8 state machines) 3 (12 state machines)
        PWM 16 24
        ADC 4-chan 12-bit ADC 4-chan 12-bit (QFN-60EP), 8-chan 12-bit (QFN-80EP)
        DAC None None
        HSTX None One
        Engines ? RNG, SHA-256

        https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/RP2350

        • thejml@sh.itjust.works
          link
          fedilink
          arrow-up
          1
          ·
          edit-2
          16 days ago

          Personally, I never really counted the RP2350 as a successor. It’s a different animal completely. A 2040 successor would be something like 4x cortex-m0’s or a faster clock with more ram or whatever, the 2350 has completed different capabilities and components and can live along side the 2040.

          I feel like the preferred one is the 2040 simply because it’s cheaper, and capable enough for the vast majority of use cases at this point.

          Edit: yes I know RPI called their board using the 2350 the pico 2, but the 2040 chip itself is used in more places than just the pico and not every one used the 2350 as a v2.

        • Tavi@lemmy.blahaj.zone
          link
          fedilink
          English
          arrow-up
          1
          ·
          16 days ago

          Cheap. Also, a large part of the tinkering community never moves past soldering or perf board + lack of cheap 2354 boards. 2040 is already good enough for keebs and most projects. 2350 had eratta E9 published (gpio lockup) which killed its initial adoption rate for more advanced projects PicoLogicAnalyzer, protocol emulation, etc.

    • 0x0@lemmy.zip
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      1
      ·
      16 days ago

      Same with raspberrypi really.
      companies just can’t seem to know how to grow without line go up mentality.

    • mesa@piefed.social
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      0
      ·
      16 days ago

      There are clones now more open than arduino that we can buy. In addition esp32 and other small boards are awesome.

  • BlameTheAntifa@lemmy.world
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    2
    ·
    16 days ago

    Arduino has been irrelevant for a while. There are better alternatives for everything they offer. For a start, take a look at Raspberry Pi’s microcontrollers.

      • Quetzalcutlass@lemmy.world
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        1
        ·
        16 days ago

        The closest they’ve come so far is prioritizing industrial customers and compute modules for a while during a chip shortage, to my memory. Hopefully they stick to their roots in the hobbyist/educational sector.

        • Fiery@lemmy.dbzer0.com
          link
          fedilink
          arrow-up
          1
          ·
          16 days ago

          To be fair, if most of your funding (source needed) comes from industrial customers, not supplying them is a good way to lose their patronage.

          So even if it sucked for hobbyists at that moment, keeping a big player like RbP viable for the long term might not be too bad of a tradeoff.