It gets my goat that people think it’s a good option. There are plenty of articles explaining some of the many issues with it, but a few are:

  1. It’s run by anti-LGBTQ+ crypto bros.
  2. It has ads right out of the box.
  3. It collected donations towards people who never signed up for them - then held them to ransom in exchange for the kind of information you should never share on the Internet.
  4. They’re a for-profit advertising company. “Privacy-centric” my elbow.
  • JackbyDev@programming.dev
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    4
    ·
    37 minutes ago

    They added referrals to links you clicked. If there is one thing a browser should do its go to the link you click without modification.

  • zarkanian@sh.itjust.works
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    4
    arrow-down
    1
    ·
    2 hours ago

    I’d like to hear more about #3 and #4. They seem to be a software company. Of course, that doesn’t mean that they can’t also be an advertising company (see Google).

  • No1@aussie.zone
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    3
    arrow-down
    1
    ·
    2 hours ago

    Any recommendations for 3 requirements:

    1. Need android and Linux. Windows maybe, but don’t care much.
    2. Must be able to open local html files. This means no Firefox and derivatives as it can’t open local files on android.
    3. Must reliably sync at least bookmarks. I last switched from Vivaldi because their sync was busted for months.

    Happy to try out anything

  • hemmetti@lemmy.world
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    34
    arrow-down
    1
    ·
    6 hours ago

    Brave is just a shitty browser. Did not know they were anti-freedom kind of people. Makes browser no-no.

  • TerribleReason1234@thelemmy.club
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    3
    arrow-down
    7
    ·
    2 hours ago

    It is really hard to say, I am using brave and have none of these issues on GNU/Linux. Brave is FOSS, has a built in adblocker, Tor private mode, fast, and brave shields. I prefer it over Firefox, because Firefox went down a path I did not like. I might switch to librewolf of GNU icecat someday.

  • pomegranatefern@sh.itjust.works
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    13
    arrow-down
    1
    ·
    6 hours ago

    I have been using Brave for its out of the box ad and tracker blocking. I’d been uncomfortable with the new AI features and had always been skeptical of the crypto integration, but it wasn’t until this post that I realized it was appreciably worse than Firefox on those counts, nor how bad the people running it are.

    Obviously, I’m now looking for other options. I’ve seen some good recs for desktop browsers elsewhere on this post, but what I’m not seeing is a lot of good mobile browser suggestions that will have the desired features. What would the folks here suggest for an e/OS browsing experience with similar or better privacy and ad blocking options? I know there’s Firefox, but A. With all the AI it keeps pushing, I’m sure there has to be better and B. I do also have mobile Firefox but have found it substantially less usable for my habit of browsing with a zillion tabs both non-incognito and incognito, so I mostly had only been it when I couldn’t get a video to play in Brave.

    I am, obviously, willing to run de-Googled Chromium, but if something else is going to actually support 100+ tabs in a performant fashion I’d be happy to totally de-Chromium too.

    I also use the shit out of profiles on Brave desktop, though mobile doesn’t support it. Do the Firefox forks like Waterfox have a similar option on desktop? Does another browser? I know it’s a feature Chrome has because I do sadly have to use Chrome for work, so I would expect at least the de-Googled Chromium-based ones would?

    • stochastictrebuchet@sh.itjust.works
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      10
      ·
      6 hours ago

      I’ve been using Vivaldi (chromium-based) for about three years now. It’s customizable and has been generally solid. Also has a couple of unique tab management features. Doesn’t have builtin ad blocking afaik. But for that I use adguard desktop and route all my traffic through it, which filters out ads regardless of which browser I’m in. On iOS I can recommend Orion by kagi. It’s the only other webkit browser besides Safari, runs light, and has decent builtin ad blocking

    • Cevilia (they/she/…)@lemmy.blahaj.zoneOP
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      9
      ·
      6 hours ago

      Firefox (and its forks) have an integrated profile manager, though it’s not always intuitive to figure out how to get to it. LibreWolf is the fork I seem to always go back to, and it has zero slop.

      I use containers. Right-click on the new tab button and pick a container to open the tab in. There’s also an add-on that will do this automatically for you when you visit a specific website, so if you want every site to live in its own container, you can do that too.

      Personally I just use its built-in cross-site cookie blocking, but multiple ways to do the same thing.

      • pomegranatefern@sh.itjust.works
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        5
        ·
        edit-2
        5 hours ago

        LibreWolf looks promising. No mobile app, but they recommend IronFox for that, so I just downloaded that to play with. Thanks!

        Edit: mobile IronFox is looking pretty good so far. Made configuring privacy settings an option just out of the box, which I appreciate. Biggest problem right now is that I can’t seem to figure out how to import my bookmarks from Brave.

    • pomegranatefern@sh.itjust.works
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      3
      ·
      edit-2
      18 minutes ago

      Currently trying mobile IronFox. I’m liking the privacy options and how stuff like unlock origin is literally included in the setup process. Their dark mode is nice and they offer a lot of compatibility options.

      Biggest downsides I’m seeing so far (I’ll see about keeping this updated as I go):

      1. Can’t seem to figure out how to import my bookmarks from Brave, and I have looked extensively.
      2. No tab groups (not the end of the world, but it was a nice feature). EDIT: Looks like Collections does that! EDIT TWO: Not really good for Incognito mode though.
      3. Clears your browser history by default on close, which may be undesired behavior. (I personally tend to use incognito for most things and then transfer sites over to tabs in non-incognito (cognito?) modes if I want them available regularly, so for me this was undesired, but it was easy to turn off.)
      4. Brave had a built-in experimental dark mode to dark modify websites that I am not seeing in IronFox. I’m sure there are extensions that will do it for me, so I’ll go looking, but I just discovered so many sites I did not realize were light mode all along. Reading mode also does the trick for most articles.
  • They’re a for-profit advertising company. “Privacy-centric” my elbow.

    a for-profit company partially funded by the billionaire Peter Thiel, of Palantir fame. the same Palantir spying on Americans in order to allow nazis to round up immigrants and throw them into concentration camps. the same Peter Thiel that said democracy is not compatible with freedom.

    • TrickDacy@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      13
      ·
      8 hours ago

      The same one who wants to create the apocalypse and believes the anti-Christ is anyone who isn’t fascistic

      • I_Has_A_Hat@lemmy.world
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        3
        arrow-down
        2
        ·
        1 hour ago

        He also created JavaScript, but I don’t see people getting upset and telling others to not use JavaScript.

        • phutatorius@lemmy.zip
          link
          fedilink
          English
          arrow-up
          1
          ·
          42 minutes ago

          Well, JavaScript has a lot of horrible features, but it’s ubiquitous and we’re stuck with it for the time being. Certainly it’s another thing to blame Eich for, rather than something that mitigates his other shitty behavior.

  • yeehaw@lemmy.ca
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    45
    ·
    10 hours ago

    Just mentioned how I didn’t like people recommending this like last week and got “ok” as a response lol. Some people are just ignorant and don’t care.

  • Mikina@programming.dev
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    191
    arrow-down
    1
    ·
    13 hours ago

    It’s a for profit ad company making a “privacy first browser”.

    Thinking for literaly a second about that sentence should tell you all you need to know.

    • Electricd@lemmybefree.net
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      2
      arrow-down
      5
      ·
      7 hours ago

      you can do privacy friendly ads, it’s not because the entire industry has evolved to an horrible point that the good way of doing it can’t exist

  • Enkrod@feddit.org
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    138
    arrow-down
    3
    ·
    13 hours ago
    1. it’s fucking Chromium

    Go use some Firefox-derivative like Librewolf or Fennec, like a sane person.

    • TrickDacy@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      19
      ·
      10 hours ago

      Yeah, this is important. Fuck Google. I will only ever use a chromium browser if I have to for work or for a misbehaving website.

      • Scubus@sh.itjust.works
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        4
        ·
        6 hours ago

        I don’t know enough about browsers to really know anything about chromium. But I did see a statement from Google which I believe stated that they were removing support for adblockers from chromium based browsers. It was at that point that I decided I did want to continue having a usable browsing experience, and immediately swapped.

      • grue@lemmy.world
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        10
        ·
        9 hours ago

        I will reject the misbehaving website rather than resort to using Chromium.

        • TrickDacy@lemmy.world
          link
          fedilink
          English
          arrow-up
          14
          ·
          9 hours ago

          Occasionally though, life requires using a shit website. I do avoid it if possible though

          • grue@lemmy.world
            link
            fedilink
            English
            arrow-up
            10
            arrow-down
            1
            ·
            8 hours ago

            Your attitude is very reasonable. I strive to be as unreasonable as I can.

            reference

            “The reasonable man adapts himself to the world: the unreasonable one persists in trying to adapt the world to himself. Therefore all progress depends on the unreasonable man.” ― George Bernard Shaw

            • unconfirmedsourcesDOTgov@lemmy.sdf.org
              link
              fedilink
              English
              arrow-up
              3
              ·
              4 hours ago

              This is hilarious for me if only because at some point ages ago I tagged you with, simply, “seems reasonable”.

              Fortunately, I also agree with your reasoning for being unreasonable, thus returning you back to the realm of reasonability while striving to be unreasonable.

    • Electricd@lemmybefree.net
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      4
      arrow-down
      2
      ·
      8 hours ago

      Librewolf’s defaults are so bad, and changing them basically entirely removes the anti fingerprinting features

      • towerful@programming.dev
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        1
        ·
        21 minutes ago

        Never used librewolf.
        But it sounds like the conveniences you want are a compromise for fingerprinting.

        Don’t let perfect stand in the way of good.
        The internet has been significantly ruined by large companies.
        There is a loop where companies with the resources to create and maintain frameworks/tooling/whatever are large enough to help define “features” for browsers.
        Browsers don’t make money, not really. To even be considered, they have to be able to run what the big companies are pushing.
        All of this makes it very easy for smaller companies to deliver better websites. Or abuse the features big companies are pushing.

        It’s like: email was awesome, then spam emails happened. Websites were accessible, then SPAs happened. Search engines were useful, the scraping/AI happened.

        I don’t know what I am trying to say.
        Other than browsers do not get the support they deserve to actually be decent unless they are backed by a company that wants to loss-lead them… Which has resulted in the web being pretty fucked

    • starman2112@sh.itjust.works
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      10
      ·
      8 hours ago

      Basically the thing that turned the internet against Honey, but when a homophobic piece of shit does it it’s fine