It gets my goat that people think it’s a good option. There are plenty of articles explaining some of the many issues with it, but a few are:

  1. It’s run by anti-LGBTQ+ crypto bros.
  2. It has ads right out of the box.
  3. It collected donations towards people who never signed up for them - then held them to ransom in exchange for the kind of information you should never share on the Internet.
  4. They’re a for-profit advertising company. “Privacy-centric” my elbow.
  • JackbyDev@programming.dev
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    38
    ·
    1 day ago

    They added referrals to links you clicked. If there is one thing a browser should do its go to the link you click without modification.

    • lad@programming.dev
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      1
      ·
      15 hours ago

      As far as I remember, there is some browser with a feature of stripping tracking id from the URL, that is modification, but I find it good (if I can opt in, and if the feature is visible enough to know what to try if it doesn’t work)

      • JackbyDev@programming.dev
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        4
        ·
        14 hours ago

        And you chose to do that or it was a feature that was advertised to you. Adding referral IDs to links you click so the browser company gets money is not comparable to that at all.

        • lad@programming.dev
          link
          fedilink
          English
          arrow-up
          1
          ·
          4 hours ago

          Mind you, I’m not arguing that was crappy, just that not any modification of links is bad

          • JackbyDev@programming.dev
            link
            fedilink
            English
            arrow-up
            1
            ·
            3 hours ago

            I would argue that if you know your browser is stripping tracking info for links then the link you clicked on doesn’t have tracking information.