• PugJesus@piefed.socialM
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      5
      ·
      20 days ago

      Liberal as a contrast to leftist usually means types who are onboard with “business-friendly” policies but not outright conservatives. It’s common for liberal parties of that sort to think they can “ride out” waves of fascist populism by making token concessions and waiting for the ‘fad’ to fade.

      The issue is that usually a surge in fascism is because of an underlying problem, whether economic, cultural, or political, so what they really are doing is giving fascism more power for their own eventual destruction.

  • PugJesus@piefed.socialM
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    8
    arrow-down
    1
    ·
    20 days ago

    “Let’s just destroy just half the Free People of Middle Earth, I’m sure Sauron will be satisfied with that!”

  • Sundray@lemmus.org
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    6
    ·
    20 days ago

    “I’m fed up with Gondor. Let’s just let Sauron have Middle Earth, that’ll teach them a lesson!”*

    *This is not an attempt a politically coherent statement, just me, a socialist, making a shitty joke.

    • PugJesus@piefed.socialM
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      5
      ·
      20 days ago

      Once the Free People of Middle Earth see how terrible Sauron is firsthand, they’ll HAVE to come crawling back to the ol’ Mayor of Laketown!

  • FiniteBanjo@feddit.online
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    11
    arrow-down
    8
    ·
    20 days ago

    Yes thats exactly what happened when 6 million protest voters got Donald Trump elected a second time.

    Oh wait. Hang on. That means the non-liberal leftists chose to keep the fascism, no?

    Project much?

    • PugJesus@piefed.socialM
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      4
      ·
      20 days ago

      The world is much broader than the USA, please remember. Liberals have a long history of insufficient response to fascism, and while you can claim it’s because liberals are more often in the ‘driver’s seat’, so to speak, and able to be criticized, that doesn’t blunt the core critique that compromise with fascism is a fool’s game, and one that liberal parties engage in far too often.

      • FiniteBanjo@feddit.online
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        1
        arrow-down
        2
        ·
        20 days ago

        Another example, then.

        The “leftists” and liberals, and to clarify I don’t believe nonliberal leftists are actually left because I think respect for individual autonomy and civil rights are a nonnegotiable progressive stance, but in the context of this discussion we’re referring to self identified leftists, split in Germany’s Wehrmacht Republic leading to a failure to form government for three elections until the Nazis seized power on the fourth.

        The rise of a divide in the left is always heralding an age of fascism, because of purity politics and foreign psyops.

        • PugJesus@piefed.socialM
          link
          fedilink
          English
          arrow-up
          4
          ·
          20 days ago

          The “leftists” and liberals, and to clarify I don’t believe nonliberal leftists are actually left because I think respect for individual autonomy and civil rights are a nonnegotiable progressive stance, but in the context of this discussion we’re referring to self identified leftists, split in Germany’s Wehrmacht Republic leading to a failure to form government for three elections until the Nazis seized power on the fourth.

          … okay, but that split occurred in no small part because the liberal party, Zentrum, preferred to negotiate with the conservatives and literal Nazis over supporting the Social Democrats.

          Liberals are far from always at fault. But it’s a definite tendency of the liberal worldview, oriented largely towards procedure and compromise, to end up taking the wrong fucking tack towards fascists, who care for neither.

          The rise of a divide in the left is always heralding an age of fascism, because of purity politics and foreign psyops.

          1. And when the divide is predicated on the ‘moderate’ rather than the radical wing?

          2. Fuck, man, it’s 2026. Considering we’re both Americans and talking in a very American context, if we can’t voice our objections to the overall game plan of liberals now, when can we voice it? Saying “Holy fuck liberals, you need to snort some fucking wig powder and get that 1776 energy back” is hardly ‘splitting the party’ two years out from the next presidential; it’s voicing serious fucking concern over liberals falling into the same trap as other liberal parties in the past - including the Dems, who opted to play softball through both Obama’s terms (which I don’t blame Obama specifically for - God knows he had a very narrow line to walk as the first Black president) and Hillary’s campaign and Biden’s term and the Harris campaign.

          Liberals offering compromise to the “Very Economically Anxious Concerned Right-Wing” and getting screwed by it is a classic Lucy-and-the-football situation. Most of us here don’t hate Charlie Brown. We just want him to stop fucking falling for it, especially since when we all fucking pay for his gullibility, and politely pointing it out has done jack squat.

          As any number of political comedians will tell you, mockery is more powerful than etiquette.

    • Scubus@sh.itjust.works
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      3
      ·
      20 days ago

      I think he’s saying that if we’re given anything other than a right wing option we would take it

      • FiniteBanjo@feddit.online
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        2
        ·
        20 days ago

        That would be a great alternative to the right wing option if there were only two options, really wish we could all agree on that.

    • Keeponstalin@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      7
      arrow-down
      5
      ·
      edit-2
      20 days ago

      It was the Democrat’s strategy that resulted in low voter turnout. The votes were up for grabs, they ran away from them.It’s not like the campaign was unaware of what messaging and policies were unpopular. They chose to ignore it. They chose to run to the right on policy and messaging.If they gave a shit about being an opposition to fascism, about actually winning, they would have heeded all the warning signs and run a different campaign. Instead they prioritized the interest of their capital donors, and gave a fuck you to their constituents that they are supposed to represent.

      The data on why the Democrats failed to win is clear

      Here Are 34 Polls That Show A Ceasefire & Weapons Embargo Help Kamala Win

      Kamala Would Have Won With A Weapons Embargo

      Democrats’ Working-Class Failures, Analysis Finds, Are ‘Why Trump Beat Harris’

      2024 Post-Election Report: A retrospective and longitudinal data analysis on why Trump beat Harris

      How Trump and Harris Voters See America’s Role in the World

      Majority of Americans support progressive policies such as higher minimum wage, free college

      Democrats should run on the popular progressive ideas, but not the unpopular ones

      Here Are 7 ‘Left Wing’ Ideas (Almost) All Americans Can Get Behind

      Finding common ground: 109 national policy proposals with bipartisan support

      Progressive Policies Are Popular Policies

      Tim Walz’s Progressive Policies Popular With Republicans in Swing States

      https://blueprint2024.com/polling/harris-poll-positive-message-8-8/

      https://blueprint-research.com/polling/distance-biden-ads-message-test-10-15/

      The Democratic Party is the one compromising with fascism. As Liberals have done historically and continue to do so.

      • FiniteBanjo@feddit.online
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        6
        arrow-down
        4
        ·
        edit-2
        20 days ago

        It was the GOP’s strategy, billionaires strategy, Russia’s and China’s strategy that lead to lower turnout.

        And you’re acting as a part of that strategy, the strategy to keep fascists in power.

        The DNC campaigned on taxing the rich, healthcare for all, removing money from politics. The problem wasn’t policy, it was optics.

        • Keeponstalin@lemmy.world
          link
          fedilink
          English
          arrow-up
          3
          arrow-down
          3
          ·
          edit-2
          20 days ago

          I swear you are allergic to reading. How many of those links have you actually looked at?

          It was both a messaging issue and a policy issue. Ignoring the bad foreign policy of the campaign and also the lack of messaging on the popular policies, or how Harris shyed away from popular policy messaging, doesn’t change the reality that her campaign was a failure. If the failures aren’t actually addressed, nothing will change.

          Data For Progress and Blueprint Analysis

          • PugJesus@piefed.socialM
            link
            fedilink
            English
            arrow-up
            4
            ·
            20 days ago

            Banjo:

            The problem wasn’t policy, it was optics.

            You:

            I swear you are allergic to reading. How many of those links have you actually looked at?

            Did you not read what you yourself posted in this very comment?

            image

            image

            image

            image

            image