• supersquirrel@sopuli.xyz
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    35
    ·
    17 days ago

    Lol nope, out of principle I will never pay for this even if I didn’t already hate Google.

    It feels so condescending to the user, so unconcerned with their agency that I could never bring myself to support this choice with even a tiny amount of money.

    • cosmicrookie@lemmy.worldOP
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      10
      ·
      17 days ago

      100% agree. The problem is that there are more and more features that get tugged behind the subscription paywall

    • NutinButNet@hilariouschaos.com
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      3
      ·
      17 days ago

      Same here. I’m sick of seeing people say stuff like “just pay for Premium bro”. Stfu. That’s like paying the mafia for “protection” from them. YouTube created these problems and now I have to pay them to fix it? Fuck no.

  • tal@lemmy.today
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    10
    ·
    17 days ago

    You can use yt-dlp to download it and play it in whatever movie player you want that supports variable speeds, unless and until YouTube cracks down on downloading.

    • CerebralHawks@lemmy.dbzer0.com
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      3
      ·
      17 days ago

      I use jdownloader2. I think it uses yt-dl on the backend though? Like the original yt-dl. I’m not sure.

      I was curious so I downloaded the Mac version of yt-dlp (as I am on Mac), couldn’t get it to run. And I’m comfortable with the command line.

      YouTube kinda is cracking down on downloading though. If a video is marked as adult (you need to sign in to view it), it can’t be downloaded. A lot of “official videos” (like trailers from the studio) can’t be downloaded. Subtitles can’t be downloaded. That’s in jd2. Not sure about yt-dlp.

      • tal@lemmy.today
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        2
        ·
        17 days ago

        I think it uses yt-dl on the backend though? Like the original yt-dl.

        You’re probably thinking of youtube-dl. I’d guess that it most-likely used that at one point, but probably switched to yt-dlp when YouTube started throttling single-stream downloads.

      • Koarnine@pawb.social
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        1
        ·
        15 days ago

        Yt-dlp all those work, though you may need log in (cookie) for ‘adult’ content

        But i dl with subtitles every time ‘–write-auto-subs’ or ‘–write-subs en’ or ‘all’, also got ‘–convert-subs srt’ yt-dlp the goat

        • CerebralHawks@lemmy.dbzer0.com
          link
          fedilink
          English
          arrow-up
          2
          ·
          15 days ago

          Nice, but that doesn’t work on my machine as of yet.

          It’s weird that the default archive utility we (Mac users) all use (The Unarchiver) can’t do .7z files, but if they’re downloaded through jdownloader2, they unzip just fine. The actual 7-Zip application is only available as a command line interface on Mac, whereas on Windows, as you probably know, it’s more like a file manager.

          One of these days I’ll get yt-dlp working on my Mac. Even being in the same folder as it, typing yt-dlp in the terminal doesn’t open it. That’s how it worked in DOS/Windows (or you had it in a folder you declared in PATH= in Autoexec.bat, back in the day), but Mac/UNIX terminal is something I have very little experience in. Comfortable with it, but inexperienced. So I suppose I have some reading to do. Especially if the subs work as well as you say.

          • Koarnine@pawb.social
            link
            fedilink
            English
            arrow-up
            1
            ·
            13 days ago

            Aye yeah that’s fair, in that case i’d recommend PeaZip, it’s what I use on my CachyOS setup since 7zip is just cli on Unix. PeaZip has a nice file manager UI.

            In terms of yt-dlp it really depends how you installed it…

            Assuming you’re in the folder where yt-dlp is:

            1. Make it executable

            chmod +x yt-dlp

            2. Run it directly from the current folder

            ./yt-dlp --version

            If that works, then the binary is fine and it’s just a PATH thing.

            I’d recommend just installing it through Homebrew personally, it will sort out the PATH for you automatically.

            install Homebrew if you don’t have it (from brew.sh)

            then:

            brew install yt-dlp

            yt-dlp --version

            Otherwise if you want to make the binary work (if you already have the file or want to download it manually)

            Open the folder in terminal and then

            move it somewhere on PATH

            sudo mv yt-dlp /usr/local/bin/yt-dlp

            make sure it’s executable

            sudo chmod a+rx /usr/local/bin/yt-dlp

            Now whichever way you choose, you should be able to just do:

            yt-dlp https://example.com/video --write-auto-subs

            Along with whatever other commands you want to use!

            • CerebralHawks@lemmy.dbzer0.com
              link
              fedilink
              English
              arrow-up
              2
              ·
              13 days ago

              Thanks! Should have known I could install it with brew. I installed that pretty early on. It’s now updating a bunch of stuff because I really don’t use it that much.

              I think some of your commands are Linux-specific but I’m going with the homebrew installation.

    • CerebralHawks@lemmy.dbzer0.com
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      7
      ·
      17 days ago

      That’s what I wanted to know. Until I realised I don’t care how people watch YouTube and that it’s more annoying to me that Google is paywalling something that costs them nothing to implement.

    • Pika@sh.itjust.works
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      4
      ·
      17 days ago

      I watch most IT/Technical videos at 1.5-2x speed. Especially tutorial style videos. Most creators use a very long and drawn out way of speaking in order to keep the viewer on the same page, but most of the time I know the core concepts already, so I don’t need the super detailed parts only the barebones.

    • cosmicrookie@lemmy.worldOP
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      4
      ·
      17 days ago

      This was a video of a machine treating pomegranate seeds 🤷 don’t ask

      But it was filmed in a lot of detail and there was no need to watch the whole thing. The creators should probably have made a highlights video instead.

      • underisk@lemmy.ml
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        1
        ·
        17 days ago

        I would give anything to skim an article rather than sit through a 10 minute video for the one thing I need to know.

        • Koarnine@pawb.social
          link
          fedilink
          English
          arrow-up
          2
          ·
          15 days ago

          Use the transcript and skip/read through

          It’s on every youtube video at the bottom of the description!

    • tal@lemmy.today
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      2
      ·
      17 days ago

      I don’t know what YouTube does when you increase playback speed, but a lot of people who listen to podcast-type material or lectures will use software that has the ability to time-stretch the playback without changing the pitch. That is, we can often understand people perfectly well speaking more quickly than they actually do.

      I imagine that some people are most-likely looking at content of that sort on YouTube.

  • pir8t0x@lemmy.ml
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    2
    ·
    edit-2
    14 days ago

    So infuriating… Sadly, I can’t even boycott YouTube because of how much good content it has

    Note: Btw, don’t think that I’m one of those normies who use YouTube on its official app with my account logged in and definitely don’t think I’m a normie that doesn’t use an ad-blocker

    • jjjalljs@ttrpg.network
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      2
      ·
      15 days ago

      …what? Go do something else instead of watching YouTube-style content then. Read a book. Take up knitting. Do crosswords.

      You can live a full life without Internet videos.

        • Scrollone@feddit.it
          link
          fedilink
          English
          arrow-up
          1
          ·
          16 days ago

          Exactly. We better stop using Chrome. I mean, we should stop using Google products altogether. But for YouTube, it’s impossible to find an alternative that has the same content.