??? That literally just says that it always agrees with you. I am not saying it’s always wrong or anything but you can’t say it’s always right. You cannot only rely on that.
Not like I know how it works but what could it so? Detect some patterns in pixels? AI would be changing anyway and would overcome that eventually. but i don’t actually know how it works you’re the one using it so you tell me ig.
Besides from detectors like these having been proven to be wrong a lot. You cannot only use your personal experience. As an analogy to see why you should take the experience of others into account. Image someone drives drunk and nwver crashes so they think it’s completely safe. (we’re not comparing the risks nor stakes here).
Usually, if everyone thinks you are wrong, you are probably wrong, so unless you 100% know the in’s and outs of it, why it always in any hypothetical scenario or at least in most it would work… then you probably should check on it. I am bot blaming you or anything, we all have done worse stuff. Still I am guessing that if you’re just saying “it works for me all the time” instead of explaining why it would, you probably don’t have a technical reason to believe ot would.
Sorry if this was like uhh idk insultive or whatever people say nowindays. also idk how to spell probably.
Oh yeah also this is from a video, someone mentioned that, it’s a cool video and actually not too strange of a pose in retrospective, even my dog does similar stuff.
really…
Yep.
those “detectors” are highly unreliable, but look at it’s left paw
I hate this post-LLM world
https://youtu.be/hzhgprZ9abI
Timestamp 4:10
I found it in video form. It’s not proof of anything but that’s the source of the frame.
exactly
looks perfectly normal once the cat moves and you can see how the anatomy works
I’m not saying this pic is necessarily really, however you should put next to zero stock in these “AI detectors”.
They’ve been close to 100% accurate by my testing
how do you test?
Using Al-driven AI-detectors
Send it AI pictures that you know are AI and it is able to determine its AI. Send it photographs that aren’t AI and it determines its not AI.
How else would you test it?
Send it pictures that look like AI but you know aren’t, send it pictures that don’t look like they’re made by AI but you know they are.
It’s not just yes or no, it’s a wider ranging analysis.
Send it photoshopped images
When I send it pictures that look like AI, it says it’s AI. And when I send it pictures I know aren’t AI, it says it isn’t.
Your bias is personal it seems. I don’t have these issues.
??? That literally just says that it always agrees with you. I am not saying it’s always wrong or anything but you can’t say it’s always right. You cannot only rely on that.
Not like I know how it works but what could it so? Detect some patterns in pixels? AI would be changing anyway and would overcome that eventually. but i don’t actually know how it works you’re the one using it so you tell me ig.
Besides from detectors like these having been proven to be wrong a lot. You cannot only use your personal experience. As an analogy to see why you should take the experience of others into account. Image someone drives drunk and nwver crashes so they think it’s completely safe. (we’re not comparing the risks nor stakes here).
Usually, if everyone thinks you are wrong, you are probably wrong, so unless you 100% know the in’s and outs of it, why it always in any hypothetical scenario or at least in most it would work… then you probably should check on it. I am bot blaming you or anything, we all have done worse stuff. Still I am guessing that if you’re just saying “it works for me all the time” instead of explaining why it would, you probably don’t have a technical reason to believe ot would.
Sorry if this was like uhh idk insultive or whatever people say nowindays. also idk how to spell probably.
I hope you can see how that is just confirmation bias and not proof
Oh yeah also this is from a video, someone mentioned that, it’s a cool video and actually not too strange of a pose in retrospective, even my dog does similar stuff.
I hate this LLM-post world.
Unless you use something like synthID verification, stop using these detectors. They are 0% reliable
Yet they all agree with one another other. Funny how that is. If it’s not AI for one, it’s not for all, and vice versa. They’re accurate enough.
You’re wrong, someone found the clip and it’s very clearly not AI.
they could literally just use he same protocol… which could make them less realiable in some cases really.
ah. want me to tell you your horoscope as well, while we’re at it?
Embarrassing.
at least we agree that you are
Blocked. Go annoy someone else.
tell that to yourself
No.
your ai slop tools are wrong btw
Exactly, cats aren’t real they’re just a computer half lucid apeing