??? That literally just says that it always agrees with you. I am not saying it’s always wrong or anything but you can’t say it’s always right. You cannot only rely on that.
Not like I know how it works but what could it so? Detect some patterns in pixels? AI would be changing anyway and would overcome that eventually. but i don’t actually know how it works you’re the one using it so you tell me ig.
Besides from detectors like these having been proven to be wrong a lot. You cannot only use your personal experience. As an analogy to see why you should take the experience of others into account. Image someone drives drunk and nwver crashes so they think it’s completely safe. (we’re not comparing the risks nor stakes here).
Usually, if everyone thinks you are wrong, you are probably wrong, so unless you 100% know the in’s and outs of it, why it always in any hypothetical scenario or at least in most it would work… then you probably should check on it. I am bot blaming you or anything, we all have done worse stuff. Still I am guessing that if you’re just saying “it works for me all the time” instead of explaining why it would, you probably don’t have a technical reason to believe ot would.
Sorry if this was like uhh idk insultive or whatever people say nowindays. also idk how to spell probably.
??? That literally just says that it always agrees with you. I am not saying it’s always wrong or anything but you can’t say it’s always right. You cannot only rely on that.
Not like I know how it works but what could it so? Detect some patterns in pixels? AI would be changing anyway and would overcome that eventually. but i don’t actually know how it works you’re the one using it so you tell me ig.
Besides from detectors like these having been proven to be wrong a lot. You cannot only use your personal experience. As an analogy to see why you should take the experience of others into account. Image someone drives drunk and nwver crashes so they think it’s completely safe. (we’re not comparing the risks nor stakes here).
Usually, if everyone thinks you are wrong, you are probably wrong, so unless you 100% know the in’s and outs of it, why it always in any hypothetical scenario or at least in most it would work… then you probably should check on it. I am bot blaming you or anything, we all have done worse stuff. Still I am guessing that if you’re just saying “it works for me all the time” instead of explaining why it would, you probably don’t have a technical reason to believe ot would.
Sorry if this was like uhh idk insultive or whatever people say nowindays. also idk how to spell probably.