Magazine, but agreed.

A.) No they’re not

B.) If they do, then good for everyone in California. Let them dodge taxes elsewhere.

There is absolutely no way you’re using an LLM to rewrite the Linux kernel in any way. That’s not what they do, and whatever it produces wouldn’t be even a fraction of effective as the current kernel.

They’re text prediction machines. That’s it. Markov generators on steroids.

I’d also be curious about where that 15-20% productivity increase comes from in aggregate. That’s an extremely misleading statistic. The truth is there are no consensus data on any productivity improvements with LLMs today in aggregate. Anything anyone has is made up. It’s also not taking into account the additional bugs and issues caused by LLMs, which are significant, and also not a thing you want to have happening on every PR with kernel code, I promise.

Regardless of all of that, the companies with these LLMs are using free software to train their models to make money without making their models free and open source or providing a way for people to use it for free/open source projects, so this is a clear violation of every single FOSS license model I’m familiar with (most commonly used is the Apache one).

TL;DR; they are stealing code meant to be free and public with any derivative works, profiting off it, and then refusing to honor the license model of the code/project they stole.

This is illegal. The only reason why we’re not seeing a lot about it is these FOSS generally have no money and are not going to sue them and potentially lose a substantial sum of their negligible funds in court. That’s it. Otherwise, what they are doing is very illegal. The sort of thing any professional software development company you work for’s legal team warns you about the second you start using an OSS project in your for profit business application codebase.

LLMs get away with it because $$$$$$$$$$$$$$$$$. That’s it.

Edit: added link to security article with LLMs

Essentially almost all FOSS software is under an OSS license of some sort, which allows anyone to re-use their code or software as long as what re-uses it also remains free and open source or at least having at least as open/permissive of a license policy as the original work/code.

LLMs ignore that, hide it behind a subscription, and use it to train their models for selling to soulless corporate entities who will never ever allow their code to be in the FOSS world, thus, breaking the contract.

It’s not even an implicit contract, it’s explicit, and LLM companies are ignoring this and using their investment to squash any FOSS projects that want to challenge them in court on it.

Oh, I had thought they had some control of upstream merges if its a fork. Couldn’t they choose not to include the upstream AI nonsense merges?

Already swapped to waterfox. Am happier for it

If only his supporters could read, they’d be very upset about this comparison.

Its a fork and they can choose to include the changes they want from upstream. They’ve come out and said they’re not adding this AI bullshit. Librewolf has done the same.

So yes, base is firefox, but it’s not actually Firefox, in the same way edge uses chrome as its base (not exactly, but similar)

The real insanity is still using X/Twitter

Stephen Miller is responsible for the current fascist push by the trump admin. He basically orchestrated the whole thing and gave it wings.

Without him, they’re all still fascists, but disorganized.

He’s been directing the DOJ and is responsible for the majority of the ice bullshit happening, among many other atrocities.

He’s the new Joseph Gobbels

No, but she lives life on the edge to make up for it.

Waterfox it is.

In civilized countries at least.

Tolkien lived through WW2.

Which he used as inspiration for how the nations would react to a great catastrophe.