

You misunderstand. The subscription is to get permission to drive your own car. Self driving slop is going to be the default.


You misunderstand. The subscription is to get permission to drive your own car. Self driving slop is going to be the default.


So that’s why they are paying Microsoft to make all the computers suck.


This is probably all like stand-alone Bluetooth speakers and such that have little processors in them. Analog hifi shit isn’t going be able to use AI for anything except maybe receivers or something. I guess there might be a use case for using it to balance to a room and set up EQ or something, but these guys don’t seem interested in doing anything that would require actual work to develop a real product.


Its the same model as microsoft claiming that all Office users are “copilot” users.


These guys can’t even figure out how to do curbside and how they think they are going to fly heavy commercial drones?


We literally had hundreds of games and had bought maybe ten of them.


Petite who want something better probably shouldn’t be shopping for a commodore 64.
It’s always the tortie. Not because she is the most responsible, because she is the one that would cause the most problems if she wasn’t in charge.


The first version is just a machine that mimics the human motion of doing that task. Its a mechanical reaper that is pulled by a horse:
https://okfronline.com/2024/02/inventions-of-agriculture-the-reaper/
Then someone figures out how to make a self contained engine and it becomes self propelled.
This is a process that occurred over centuries.


Well, the first step was making a machine that does every step of the process to make it easier. Then you combine those machines into one big machine, hence “combine”.
No one starts from zero and builds a machine like this. Each of those processes was its own problem that got solved first.


He should run for president.


How dare she try to drop her kid off at school.


Do you think that DHS officers are volunteers?


Does the report say that he didn’t try to murder the first person as well?


You might have lost the thread of this discussion.


Sounds more like a baseless argument to get people not to resist being attacked by ICE.


If she had just driven right through them she would probably be alive today. Her mistake was stopping and doing what they told her to do.


What makes you think Trump needs a real reason to declare martial law? That is going to happen no matter what. The only decision you have left is what you do when its your turn to get shot by ICE: Are you going to comply and take three in the face, or are you going to hit the gas and hope for the best?


The original narrative was that she was a protestor / legal observer. i.e. that she was actively engaged with the ICE activity in some capacity and that she had placed herself in harms way in the course of doing so.
This new information reveals that she was just a normal person going about her normal business before being randomly murdered by ICE.
Neither version says its OK to just murder someone, but the information that she was just a person in the wrong place takes even more out of the narrative that she somehow initiated the encounter at all.
These greedy fucks are coming after everything you have, that’s how this works.