• MsPenguinette@lemmy.world
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    12
    ·
    3 days ago

    It’s coming after your job. Why would I want to feed my output into the machine breathing down the back of all our necks? I like what I do. A carpenter isn’t going to be happy working in a factory where chairs are made by robot arms. I’m not gonna be happy working in a slop factory

      • MsPenguinette@lemmy.world
        link
        fedilink
        arrow-up
        2
        ·
        2 days ago

        Your comment was that people should be jumping at the opportunity to use it. I’m telling you why people aren’t. Efficicecy is a different thing. Maybe it might be ore apparent to you if you were to say the same thing about outsourcing to oversees rather than outsourcing to AI.

          • tyler@programming.dev
            link
            fedilink
            arrow-up
            2
            ·
            3 days ago

            it most definitely would not. you ever switched the direction of a lazy river? doesn’t take that many people. Your ignorance is showing.

              • tyler@programming.dev
                link
                fedilink
                arrow-up
                3
                arrow-down
                1
                ·
                2 days ago

                You literally stated that 8 billion people couldn’t stop the flow of the Mississippi river. Aside from the fact that the Mississippi ebbs and flows from 20 ft wide to a mile wide, 8 billion people take up a lot of mass. 8 billion people could reverse the flow of the river if they wanted.

                • NotAnOtter@lemmus.org
                  link
                  fedilink
                  English
                  arrow-up
                  1
                  arrow-down
                  2
                  ·
                  edit-2
                  1 day ago

                  I get that your argument is basically “You don’t realize how many people 8 billion people is”. My argument is “You don’t realize how big the mississippi is”.

                  Bringing up 20ft implies you are including the headwaters which is not my argument. I’m referring to downstream.

                  Even if in theory you managed to dam it - the Mississippi is so large and fast moving it would EASILY find another route. Like there would not be a “bay of Mississippi” or whatever.