The Department of Justice has released less than 1% of the so-called Epstein files, a court filing has revealed, as Democrats step up criticism of the Trump administration’s “lawlessness” for keeping records under seal.

The department conceded that only 12,285 documents, totalling 125,575 pages, relating to the disgraced financier and sex trafficker Jeffrey Epstein have been published to date, despite a federal law requiring the vast majority to be released by 19 December.

Pam Bondi, the US attorney general, wrote a five-page update to Paul Engelmayer, the federal New York judge overseeing the case, on Monday, asserting that efforts to protect the identities of Epstein’s victims were a priority, and had slowed the process.

“There are more than two million documents potentially responsive to the Act that are in various phases of review,” she wrote in the letter co-signed by Todd Blanche, her deputy, and Jay Clayton, US attorney for the southern district of New York.

"What are they trying to hide?” Chuck Schumer, the Senate minority leader, said in a post to X on Monday accusing the justice department of failing to submit a required unredacted list to Congress “of all government officials and politically exposed persons” named or referenced in the files.

“It’s been 17 DAYS since the Trump DOJ first broke the law and failed to release all the Epstein files. It’s been 14 DAYS since Trump’s DOJ released anything at all – with the DOJ doing everything in its power to delay and obfuscate.”

      • thethunderwolf@lemmy.dbzer0.com
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        3
        ·
        13 hours ago

        Very false

        • Lemmy is unlikely to be monitored because they probably haven’t heard about it or have heard and don’t care
        • It has no tracking, so the platforms don’t know who the user is; the government would have to figure it out for themselves
        • Decentralization across multiple jurisdictions impedes collaboration with governments
        • These “lists” are mostly a myth; it’s only a suspicious sequence like “how to make a bomb” then “dc police response speed” and “when will trump be in white house” that gets you on watch lists, at least in the US
        • This user (@[email protected]) might be in a country that does not have any such lists or does not monitor the internet or only monitors web searches or has no laws against such statements
        • zd9@lemmy.world
          link
          fedilink
          arrow-up
          5
          ·
          11 hours ago

          lol my sweet summer child, sorry but those first 4 points aren’t as strong as you think. The last point may still be valid. By all means Americans need to get this whole regime out, but it’s just stupid to advocate online for illegal means. Why would you post something about it?

        • zd9@lemmy.world
          link
          fedilink
          arrow-up
          1
          arrow-down
          1
          ·
          11 hours ago

          Please, keep posting how you will do some kind of illegal activity against the government. I implore you. It’s just stupid to write it online.