• kamen@lemmy.world
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    1
    ·
    3 hours ago

    Is there a Firefox fork already with mouse gestures built in (working globally)?

  • heartSagan5@lemmy.zip
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    10
    ·
    22 hours ago

    I still rock NoScript. It helps avoid drive-bys and other silliness. It does take patience though so I get why not many like it.

  • ipkpjersi@lemmy.ml
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    18
    ·
    1 day ago

    When will people switch away from Chrome to other browsers? I get it, Chrome sets the standards and it’s hard to switch away from them, but it’s necessary to ensure the survival of the Internet.

    • Crit@lemmy.wtf
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      7
      ·
      23 hours ago

      I doubt most people even know you can change it. Edge is the default browser on windows. Chromium. Chrome is the default browser on android (though I suppose Samsung has a custom browser and they’re the main android device people are buying)

  • m3t00🌎🇺🇦@lemmy.world
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    13
    arrow-down
    1
    ·
    1 day ago

    firefox became bloated so switched to chrome because faster/better. back to firefox last year. too old to keep fighting ads. thinking off button will be next. yeah addons mostly work

      • Blackmist@feddit.uk
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        3
        ·
        9 hours ago

        I switched to Chrome back then because it ran tabs in separate processes. A tab crashing in Firefox would take the whole browser down.

        The final straw for me was the plugins. Flash, Java, Acrobat, etc. Chrome kept them up to date for you. Firefox made you just through hoops, which eventually lead to a rogue site injecting crap onto my machine which took me a day to clean up. Plugins are pretty much dead now, but back then you needed them for half the web to work.

        Chrome really was a great browser back then (and MS were still in the “what’s wrong with Internet Explorer?” era), and it’s a shame that they’re now working so hard to fuck it up again.

        • mirshafie@europe.pub
          link
          fedilink
          English
          arrow-up
          2
          ·
          4 hours ago

          Chrome did a bunch of things absolutely wonderfully in the beginning. Fast JavaScript engine, removed title bar (tabs on top), simple settings page, sandboxed tabs, and they made some of the functionality of the most popular Firefox extensions the default (such as the downloads bar, instead of a separate window).

          It was basically a pre-modded Firefox, but supercharged. Now it’s corporate slop.

        • Troy@lemmy.ca
          link
          fedilink
          English
          arrow-up
          2
          ·
          10 hours ago

          I think it was still called Phoenix when I originally dropped it. Before it got renamed Firefox. Came back around last year after adblock stuff in chrome finally chased me away.

        • genzboomer@lemmy.zip
          link
          fedilink
          English
          arrow-up
          4
          ·
          16 hours ago

          I remember! 2.0 to 3.0 switch wherethe GUI slowed down dramatically. 2.0 felt like driving a sports-car.

      • anewfox@lemmy.zip
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        12
        arrow-down
        2
        ·
        24 hours ago

        nobody ever seems to detail what kinda bloat they mean when they say that, i don’t think they actually thought about it that deeply. nobody complains about anything specific like XUL support, for example.

        • narinciye@discuss.tchncs.de
          link
          fedilink
          English
          arrow-up
          10
          arrow-down
          1
          ·
          24 hours ago

          In my experience, there was a period when Firefox crashed all over the place, especially under heavy load. Tabs shared the same process back then, one tab could take down whole the browser session when crashed. I vividly remember how it felt so silky when i switched to chrome. Now I am back to Firefox since 3 years. Firefox is the sexier now with all the shiny addons

            • SailorMoss@sh.itjust.works
              link
              fedilink
              English
              arrow-up
              2
              ·
              19 hours ago

              Yeah Firefox was kind of a hog around 2013. I have a netbook that I’ve kept around since like 2014 and I remember when I first got it, it couldn’t really run Firefox. Firefox would freeze up and crash. Funily enough today Firefox runs better on that 2014 netbook than chrome does.

              I also had a high end gaming PC at the time and Firefox always ran fine as long as you had the reaources to run it.

      • thermal_shock@lemmy.world
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        3
        ·
        23 hours ago

        It was back before enshittification of the internet, when things were better. Was just big and clunky, chrome came along and ran very fast, until last few years, they swapped places.

        • korazail@eviltoast.org
          link
          fedilink
          English
          arrow-up
          2
          ·
          9 hours ago

          And Google was still ‘nice’.

          Microsoft, at least in my lifetime, invented the ‘embrace, extend, extinguish’ method, but google was certainly taking notes.

          One of the many little compromises.

    • kamen@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      2
      ·
      3 hours ago

      First time hearing of Helium, thanks for mentioning. Sounds interesting, will be keeping an eye on it.

      • KneeTitts@lemmy.world
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        11
        arrow-down
        1
        ·
        1 day ago

        Or better yet LibreWolf

        I cannot count how many things I had to change in settings to get the browser to just work right, I mean I appreciate them locking everything down to the nth degree but… damn. Finally switched to waterfox, the out of the box experience is a lot friendlier.

        • SquareScarletCougar@lemmy.world
          link
          fedilink
          English
          arrow-up
          1
          ·
          16 hours ago

          I get the frustration. It could have a tutorial / wizard to make it easier to set and understand.

          If some parts are not loading, check the top left of the address bar for some icons, by default LibreWolf blocks canvas and anything that can identify you, and you have to press on them to allow them to render the elements.

          Security unfortunately implies more inconvenience, which is what companies like Google love, but if it was a lot friendlier it would probably be less safe.

        • Almacca@aussie.zone
          link
          fedilink
          English
          arrow-up
          2
          arrow-down
          1
          ·
          20 hours ago

          I tried LibreWolf for a little while, but too many sites just wouldn’t load at all with it, so I went back to Firefox.

    • kestrel7_7@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      20
      ·
      1 day ago

      Brave is kinda shady with their whole cryptocurrency thing, Helium seems fine but it’s still based on Chromium. I’ve been recommending people check out Librewolf

      • hamsterkill@lemmy.sdf.org
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        22
        ·
        1 day ago

        Simple Firefox is perfectly fine.

        Ungoogled Chromium is my standby for the instances when a Blink browser is needed, though it’s not entirely simple to set up.

        • kestrel7_7@lemmy.world
          link
          fedilink
          English
          arrow-up
          5
          ·
          1 day ago

          Librewolf doesn’t do anything that Firefox can’t do with extensions + tweaking settings, but it’s nice to not have to install all the extensions

        • UnLocoPoco@lemmy.world
          link
          fedilink
          English
          arrow-up
          2
          ·
          1 day ago

          Yeah that’s why I’m debating brave. Firefox is good to especially after the huge engine overhaul a few years ago.

      • Tiral@lemmy.zip
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        3
        ·
        1 day ago

        Yeah, I’ve been on brave for a few years but switched to Firefox because it’s a different base. I don’t think it’s necessary better, but if that’s the way the wind is blowing on chromium browsers the it’s the best option.

      • Bluewing@lemmy.world
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        2
        ·
        8 hours ago

        I’m using Zen now. it took me a while while to get the hang of the UI. But once I did I found it to be very nice to have those spaces that I can organize for different tasks.

        • iamnotme@feddit.uk
          link
          fedilink
          English
          arrow-up
          1
          ·
          5 hours ago

          I’ve used Zen for about 9 months, possibly more, and have had a largely positive experience.

          It has crashed a few times recently for no obvious reason but not enough to bother me. There’s probably new release version again even though I updated my Linux instance a couple of weeks ago.

  • isekaihero@ani.social
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    36
    ·
    1 day ago

    I think I’ll be switching to librewolf at home. It can install mozilla extensions and comes with ublock origin baked in. Pulling a stunt like this is just going to drive people away from the Chrome environment. Corpos can’t help but shoot themselves in the foot.

    • MuskyLime@lemmy.zip
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      37
      ·
      1 day ago

      Most people I know simply don’t care. They will use it because it’s convenient and they don’t care about the privacy dangers. I can’t comprehend it myself though. Drives me up the wall.

      • REDACTED@infosec.pub
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        22
        ·
        1 day ago

        They will use it because it’s convenient

        Using web without ublock is amongst the most inconvenient things I’ve experienced

        • techt@lemmy.world
          link
          fedilink
          English
          arrow-up
          10
          ·
          1 day ago

          I think most people who don’t know better just think that’s “the internet” and that it’s the same no matter how you access it. The whole concept of browsers and extensions is just not in the realm of concern.

      • Random_Character_A@lemmy.world
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        16
        ·
        1 day ago

        I’ve seen some shift among the tech illiterate in my immediate vicinity, but most are still in the “I got nothing to hide” category of clueless twits.

        • MuskyLime@lemmy.zip
          link
          fedilink
          English
          arrow-up
          12
          ·
          1 day ago

          Funnily enough my two kids have expressed hatred of AI. It’s mainly people around my age or higher that can’t let any sort of convenience go even if shown the dangers.

          Otherwise I’m just “scaremongering”.

            • Hazor@lemmy.world
              link
              fedilink
              English
              arrow-up
              4
              ·
              1 day ago

              My 14yo hates the current AI but says most peers are using it and can’t understand how to write an essay or such without it.

              I think only some of the kids are alright. Many, if not most, are in trouble.

        • OnyxRex@lemmy.dbzer0.com
          link
          fedilink
          English
          arrow-up
          11
          arrow-down
          2
          ·
          1 day ago

          The problem is that everyone’s internet experience is very different these days. Your friends might be boring and actually have nothing in their lives that need compartmentalized/obfuscated. It’s unlikely but not impossible.

          The easiest way to demonstrate the problem would be when they show you something on an unprotected device you note the ads and give them shit for it. Those ads are likely targeted, and so your jabs would be targeted and personal too. Then point out that those ads are tied to THEM. Just ask every time, “have you been looking at X? Gross dude.” It doesn’t matter what it is. It’s the point that they are uncomfortable with your guess and it’s an opening to explain that, yeah it’s not just those ads buddy.

  • Julio Eusebio@lemmus.org
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    6
    ·
    1 day ago

    The transition away from Manifest V2 is a good example of how changes made by major platforms can have a huge impact on developers and users. I’m curious to see how this affects privacy-focused and specialized browser extensions over the long term.

  • elucubra@sopuli.xyz
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    38
    ·
    1 day ago

    company which makes most of it’s revenue from advertising fucks with their browser’s ability to remove ads. Go figure!

    • adarza@lemmy.ca
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      13
      ·
      1 day ago

      i am surprised it took this long, but i know that getting everybody using chromium, or at least webextensions, was part of the plan that had to exist first. and the path down mv3 started not long after both mozilla and microsoft were both roped-in.

      • Troy@lemmy.ca
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        2
        ·
        10 hours ago

        The irony is that Chrome’s rendering engine was a fork of WebKit, which was a fork of KHTML, a free and open source rendering engine created by KDE for Konqueror. They basically took something free, used Microsoft’s “embrace, extend, extinguish” tactics on it. Now KHTML is vestigial, only found in the UserAgent string.

        But we could have had a truly free open source cross platform browser with Konqueror.

        Best we have now is Firefox, but the bulk of Mozilla’s development funding comes from setting Google as the default search. So it is also hijackable.

        • tazeycrazy@feddit.uk
          link
          fedilink
          English
          arrow-up
          1
          ·
          32 minutes ago

          I think it’s the shear cost of operating a browser. I would hope Mozilla are looking to diversity there income but without ads or sales to end users I’m not sure where it can go.

        • Bluewing@lemmy.world
          link
          fedilink
          English
          arrow-up
          1
          ·
          8 hours ago

          We could maybe have done that. But Konqueror has never been that good every time I tried it.

  • Axolotl@feddit.it
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    35
    ·
    edit-2
    2 days ago

    This is gonna be so bad because now there is only uBlock origin lite and “uBlock”, if you couln’t guess: the 2nd one is a scam that google never tried to remove(it’s been up for some years IIRC) and i am sure that everyone will try to install this scam because they can’t find the original uBlock origin (and everyone just refers to uBlock origin as uBlock which makes it worse)

    • Kazumara@discuss.tchncs.de
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      27
      arrow-down
      1
      ·
      2 days ago

      the 2nd one is a scam that google never tried to remove

      It’s a little more complicated. uBlock was the original name, gorhil handed it off when he felt the maintenance burden became too high. Then he forked it to make his own uBlock Origin version.

      At some point later uBlock was bought up by the AdBlock people, who in turn were later bought by the AdBlock Plus people.

      So it’s not a scam exactly, more like an inbred sideline of the royal family.

      • ayyy@sh.itjust.works
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        19
        ·
        1 day ago

        It’s a scam because it specifically goes out of its way to not block an ad, as long as that ad pays a bribe to them. It should be called uAd.