Yeah, I deleted my comment immediately after I published it. How did you see that nearly an hour after the fact?

Regardless, doing so is extremely expensive (I would think). The ultra wealthy right now benefit from a legal system that protects them well enough, they can spend the majority of their fortune on fucking with the less fortunate. Let their paranoia dampen their capacity.

The ultra wealthy are dependent upon economic income streams to maintain any one of their systems. We are a society depend on the economy only until the economy stops serving us—by which point we depend upon ourselves and the economy flounders. I fail to see a scenario in which we are freed enough from our dependence to make tangible threat to the ultra wealthy, while still they maintain enough financial resilience to maintain their arsenal.

They’re doomed if a militia forms against them, because that’s only going to happen via their weakened capacity in the first place. Don’t you think?

deleted by creator

They want this to be a debate about whether it happened or not. I think it may be wise to turn it into a debate on whether it should matter, as you’ve pointed out. Let this be a fuckup that normalizes more danger for Putin.

deleted by creator

deleted by creator

deleted by creator

deleted by creator

deleted by creator

deleted by creator

While in military school after boot camp, I was stuck in the barracks because our Chief was extremely strict about letting us use our evening time how we’d like. While mopping the same spot for the 4th hour, I get a call from my wife advising that she’s really scared. A gun had just discharged from the neighbors house, went through our wall, got lodged in our dresser about 2” from my 1.5 year old daughter’s leg. I went to my chief and other instructors, asking to be let out so I can comfort my family. They said no, there’s nothing I can do if I leave and my family can drive to a motel if they feel unsafe.

Well, if it stays at $5 then it’s probably not a popular idea. If 1000 people like the idea and each put $5, now we’re talking $5k. Still probably not quite enough, but it is producing income via a novel way of getting in touch with the audience.

Random idea: do you think a platform for crowd sourcing / funding ideas could go well for musicians? Like a feature request in software, where users can like a post about a feature to show interest, except it would use dollars instead of likes. Fans could publish an idea for a song they like and donate $5 or whatever. If it’s a popular idea, more people donate to it and the artist takes notice (having now been somewhat paid to produce it).

Could be that refactoring the code for Windows 11 compatibility, and new features, would have been roughly equivalent in effort to rebuilding. If the code has been poked and probed for years already, still follows old patterns, and have devolved into a tightly coupled mess of scattered system dependancies… maybe it just becomes easier to justify rebuilding it as a way of clearing out technical debt?

also, time between key presses on the compromised machine could indicate network lag to what is actually a Remote Desktop.

The prosecutor’s office said no suspects had been taken into custody

Huh. I guess not being a healthcare CEO really puts a damper on the whole investigative process.

Does iMessage store the keys locally and encrypt the entire message so only the recipient can decrypt it? Any idea what their handshake looks like—I’m curious if they can still see the messages or not.

Yeah, I’m with you there. They sure as shit are going to try, regardless of whatever sustainability point you or I can think up.

Some idiots voluntarily give it away? Brother… we as a society moved the public common areas for discourse, entertainment, finance, and research onto a digital landscape. That landscape, in particular, is set up like as though every Roman in the fora had an invisible personal Sherlock Holmes set up to automatically dissect their footprints, fingerprints, the direction and timeliness of their stair, … and then to record it in a virtually limitless ledger where it can later be aggregated and analyzed for behavioral patterns. We aren’t giving it away anymore than the Roman commoners would have been by merely walking around town. This is a very aggressive data harvesting situation.

Honestly, it’s a culture I can get behind. Lower ewaste, reduce the product cycle to something greater than a year, encourage more hobbies and less consumerism, … people will flock toward things that last, which is a market that can use some love.

Propped up by what, though? They’ll just continue to dilute the name of AI with underperforming technology and yield more backlash from the public while making an oligarchy out of their richest tech influencers.