• frongt@lemmy.zip
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    9
    arrow-down
    1
    ·
    14 hours ago

    The realer play is submarines. You don’t get any satellite signal at all underwater. Before this it was only INS or dead reckoning.

    • postmateDumbass@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      4
      ·
      12 hours ago

      Im pretty sure there were underwater beacons they used for aiding their navigation. Active or passive, man made or natural phenomena…

    • CookieOfFortune@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      3
      ·
      12 hours ago

      I suspect submarines can also use bottom facing radar to track features on the sea floor. But tracking the gravity should be even better.

      • frongt@lemmy.zip
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        4
        ·
        12 hours ago

        Radar is radio, just like most satellites. It doesn’t do well through water. And that would require emissions, which submarines like to avoid.

        • FooBarrington@lemmy.world
          link
          fedilink
          English
          arrow-up
          3
          ·
          10 hours ago

          I’m guessing they meant sonar instead. AFAIK active sonar does work really well, but is rarely used since it reveals your location twice as far as you’re able to detect others. Not to mention the horrible effects on wildlife - the sound waves carry so much energy that a point-blank hit is somewhere between “lethal & untreatable” and “turned into red mist”.