• Atomic_Edge@lemmy.world
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    1
    ·
    6 hours ago

    😅Oh no, no, no, you misunderstood. They mean security for them, not for you. It’s like saying, ‘We value privacy’—but do they mean privacy for the corporation or for the consumer?

    • CosmoNova@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      5
      arrow-down
      1
      ·
      3 days ago

      I‘m not sure if Democracy can survive with that sentiment but I‘m also not sure if it can survive without it.

      • grue@lemmy.world
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        13
        ·
        3 days ago

        Democracy relies on transparency and verification, not trust. Any government official who tries to keep secrets from the public is an enemy of the People.

        • CosmoNova@lemmy.world
          link
          fedilink
          English
          arrow-up
          2
          ·
          2 days ago

          You need some trust I think. You wouldn‘t really need elections if everything was fact based and that would cause distrust.

  • PRIMEcavitationfetishist@quokk.au
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    8
    ·
    edit-2
    2 days ago

    There are people laws bind and people laws protect.

    Never both. Which one are you?

    Edit: if you’re not sure, have grok generate you some particularly bad kiddie porn, then send it to yourself and cc your local chief of police.

    • idiomaddict@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      4
      ·
      2 days ago

      Ghislaine Maxwell develops class consciousness

      I’m just joking, she already has it, along with the other billionaires