• leriotdelac@lemmy.zip
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    4
    ·
    1 hour ago

    I wish we would stop using smart to describe surveillance technology. Smart sounds nicez but there’s nothing smart about it…

  • lastlybutfirstly@lemmy.world
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    4
    ·
    2 hours ago

    Does anyone make dumb TVs anymore? Seems like there’s a sizable market for it. I haven’t had a TV in 6 years and want one for local channels, but I really don’t want a smart TV.

    • mursejoy@lemmy.zip
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      3
      ·
      1 hour ago

      I just never gave my smart TV network info. It’s at the factory settings and can’t connect to anything. If there isn’t a console connected to it then it is useless. Just like the good ole days.

    • Pueblo@feddit.org
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      1
      ·
      2 hours ago

      There is, its called industrial tv “iiyama” for example is a brand of those

  • RememberTheApollo_@lemmy.world
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    6
    ·
    7 hours ago

    I’ve had a “smart” TV for about 4 years. It keeps asking to update the firmware.

    No. Effin’. Way.

    It’s just going to install more and more spyware, bloatware, and find a way to charge me for something I didn’t have to pay for before.

    • Ann Archy@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      1
      ·
      1 hour ago

      And thus vulnerabilities are introduced. Either by not updating the FW, or by updating the FW.

  • Kairos@lemmy.today
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    122
    arrow-down
    4
    ·
    17 hours ago

    This is because as soon as a monitor is connected to a Windows computer, it automatically installs both the LG Monitor App Installer and McAfee Scam Detector without ever asking the user for permission.

    Is this not a felony under U.S. law? Computer hacking has HUGE criminal liability.

    • DoucheBagMcSwag@lemmy.dbzer0.com
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      52
      ·
      16 hours ago

      Name something you do as a corporation to avoid any laws or accountability with the current administration

      BRIBE THE DOJ

      let’s see if that answer’s on the board…survey says…!

      DING

    • themurphy@lemmy.ml
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      12
      arrow-down
      1
      ·
      16 hours ago

      It probably says somewhere in the ToS, which is still a fucking disgrace that those exists, without having to make clear and obvious bullet points you click “consent”.

      Even having to make consent multiple times should be mandatory for every shit they try to do.

      Solution if users shouldnt hit consent multiple times? Dont do shady shit.

      • UntimedDiffusion@piefed.zip
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        10
        ·
        12 hours ago

        I can’t remember the specifics right now, but in Gamers Nexus video from yesterday, according to LG ToS you must disclose something regarding spying and wiretapping laws to your family and anyone visiting your house

      • SCmSTR@lemmy.blahaj.zone
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        2
        ·
        11 hours ago

        Also, implied consent is not consent, and if there is no consent, the entire contract is unenforceable and therefore void.

      • psivchaz@reddthat.com
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        9
        ·
        15 hours ago

        I have a plan: we pass a law that any contract intended for the public (ToS, various other terms and conditions, privacy policies, etc) must be at the average reading level of the American public. We’ll either incentivize better education or better contracts. Maybe both!

        • themurphy@lemmy.ml
          link
          fedilink
          English
          arrow-up
          5
          ·
          13 hours ago

          Doesnt matter if it’s in kindergarten level reading, as long as it’s a few paragraphs long, people will accept it.

        • Buddahriffic@lemmy.world
          link
          fedilink
          English
          arrow-up
          2
          ·
          13 hours ago

          Or standardize agreements that can be agreed to with just clicks so you can tell what’s up from just seeing which agreement modules are included and what parameters they have (along with a bunch of sites that explain them in easier terms for the less literate, which will be useful because they are standards used by many agreements rather than needing a unique one for each version of each document).

      • Kairos@lemmy.today
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        11
        ·
        16 hours ago

        Apparently it’s windows doing it. Not the monitor via the HDMI or something. I guess that’s what you get for using windows.

    • ohshit604@sh.itjust.works
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      8
      arrow-down
      1
      ·
      16 hours ago

      Let me guess, proprietary drivers cause this and the open source or generic drivers lack “functionality”.

      If it turns on, reaches its peek resolution and refresh rate that is good enough for me, I genuinely can care less for HDR or the nitty gritty features.

      • deadcade@lemmy.deadca.de
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        10
        ·
        11 hours ago

        Monitors don’t need drivers. Your GPU needs drivers, and you might need color correction for your monitor.

        Microslop decided that any device that is plugged in might need drivers. They allow device manufacturers to specify an arbitrary program to be downloaded and executed by Windows Update, any time a device they make is plugged in.

      • brucethemoose@lemmy.world
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        4
        ·
        14 hours ago

        Old monitors need it for absolutely nothing, like my 2020 LG. Every feature works out of the box, because it has to over display cables.

        I think at most it adds an ICC profile, but it’s not matched to the panel anyway and you can just install that seperately.

  • groucho@retrolemmy.com
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    30
    ·
    16 hours ago

    My wife and I bought a TV on the internet. What brand? I have no idea but it’s the type they have in waiting rooms and restaurants. Zero internet. Zero apps. You push the button and it turns on. It’s the best fucking purchase we’ve made in the last five years.

    • sen@lemmy.zip
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      4
      ·
      10 hours ago

      I recently purchased a current year TCL, I don’t remember the model number but it’s the one right under their flagship.

      It’s 75" and is the most beautiful tv I’ve owned. Fast, almost OLED levels of dimming, I’m in awe when watching the right content.

      I’d pay an extra $500 for a version with no smart capabilities. Let me turn it on and boot into my android box, or console, or whatever.

    • amgine@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      4
      ·
      14 hours ago

      Commercial displays are like that. I have a couple that haven been decom’d from work I use. They don’t have speakers but I don’t need those anyway

    • Taleya@aussie.zone
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      1
      ·
      11 hours ago

      Got ours second hand from a buy nothing group. It has no apps. It doesn’t know what the internet is. It has D-SUB and RCA ports. It’s perfect

    • Druid@lemmy.zip
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      18
      arrow-down
      1
      ·
      17 hours ago

      Same! I jailbroke mine and can watch YouTube and Twitch ad-free, and it’s got Jellyfin on the homebrew channel, so I can access my server off my TV :)

      • 4am@lemmy.zip
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        18
        ·
        17 hours ago

        Omg you can jailbreak smart TVs now? HELL yeah

        EDIT: I am especially interested in LG webOS because I was a Palm Prē enjoyer back in the day and I rooted the fuck out of that phone (still have it somewhere)

      • ramenshaman@lemmy.world
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        4
        ·
        17 hours ago

        That’s awesome. Mine is 42" and I’m using it as my monitor for my desktop. I had no idea you could jailbreak TVs now, what a time to be alive. I recently picked up a Raspberry Pi 5 and I’m planning on using it to replace my stupid Chromecast on my living room TV. As long as the Pi can stream from my Jellyfin server and watch YouTube then that’s all I need.

        • Druid@lemmy.zip
          link
          fedilink
          English
          arrow-up
          3
          ·
          16 hours ago

          There’s a website called rootmy.tv that can help you find or execute roots right off the TV’s web browser. When I bought the TV, I hadn’t connected it to the Internet a single time, so it still had the stock firmware. I could just type in the URL and click a single button - that’s it. Depending on the firmware, model and brand, this could look different for you. Also I’m not sure if this only works for LG TVs - might have to do some research to find a suitable method for yours.

          That also sounds very practical. I’d love to get into Pis sometime, but the RAM fiasco is making them quite expensive for my current budget, sadly.

    • Pumpkin Escobar@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      5
      ·
      16 hours ago

      I went through the nonsense of putting the LG tv and some other stuff on a separate network that has no internet access but I can still connect to them. It’s annoying that’s needed.

        • brucethemoose@lemmy.world
          link
          fedilink
          English
          arrow-up
          6
          ·
          12 hours ago

          No, I just mean windows update will pull an LG “driver” and install it to your system automatically when it detects the display.

      • Prathas@lemmy.zip
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        2
        ·
        13 hours ago

        So, I don’t get this; if you let it install the drivers and then uninstall the drivers and use it, will it just keep reinstalling the drivers with each next connection?

        Apart from the obviously superior solution of switching to Linux, would someone need to connect while fully offline to prevent it from installing drivers and just watch predownloaded stuff (or play games offline) or what?

        • brucethemoose@lemmy.world
          link
          fedilink
          English
          arrow-up
          5
          ·
          12 hours ago

          By default? Maybe.

          But there are both global and granular Windows policies to tweak this. I disabled the device driver specifically, as I do like plug-and-play for other devices.

    • fishy@lemmy.today
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      3
      ·
      16 hours ago

      My LG TV is just so old it isn’t allowed to connect anymore lol. I just keep my old gaming laptop connected and it’s a far better experience then any modern smart TV with all the image smoothing junk.

  • floofloof@lemmy.ca
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    57
    arrow-down
    1
    ·
    edit-2
    17 hours ago

    I’ve used an LG monitor for about 5 years, and never install the manufacturer’s software unless it looks genuinely useful. When I saw the Gamers Nexus video I went to check my installed apps, and sure enough there was LG’s monitor app, installed silently without my knowledge. I used Bulk Crap Uninstaller to get rid of it.

    To prevent this kind of thing in future, run gpedit.msc and enable “Prevent automatic download of applications associated with device metadata” under Computer Configuration → Administrative Templates → System → Device Installation.

    • 0x0@infosec.pub
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      62
      arrow-down
      5
      ·
      19 hours ago

      Or you could just change to an os that doesnt piss on its users constantly

      • OS2Warp@lemmy.zip
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        1
        arrow-down
        1
        ·
        6 hours ago

        Great; what OS has the equivalent of Group Policy and Active Directory besides windows?

        • enumerator4829@sh.itjust.works
          link
          fedilink
          English
          arrow-up
          1
          ·
          1 hour ago

          This is the one thing holding open source back, and the thing Linux users keep pissing on without understanding it.

          The CTOs inept nephew can manage your fleet of windows machines and you get all the checkbox security you need for compliance (and some real security):

          • Centrally managed
          • Logs that are fairly hard to manipulate
          • SecureBoot + Bitlocker

          That same feature set on Linux will cost you a ton of money in skilled staff if you want to check the same compliance checkboxes. (As for real security, who cares, no one is doing that anyway)

          Kind regards: someone who has managed Linux fleets.

        • toddestan@lemmy.world
          link
          fedilink
          English
          arrow-up
          3
          ·
          3 hours ago

          The funny thing is, the people who care about Group Policy and Active Directory are the same people who aren’t happy about their network potentially being compromised because someone hooked up their work laptop up to a monitor at their home.

      • floofloof@lemmy.ca
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        6
        ·
        14 hours ago

        Indeed. I use Linux most of the time, and MacOS a bit of the time, but the old Windows desktop is still there for the infrequent times when I need it to work on old music projects. I have it too dual-booting into Linux, so even it spends most of its time in a more sane OS.

        • cmnybo@discuss.tchncs.de
          link
          fedilink
          English
          arrow-up
          1
          ·
          6 hours ago

          Multiple GPUs work fine in Linux. You can have one playing a game while you wait for the others to finish the real work.

        • BigDaddySlim@lemmy.world
          link
          fedilink
          English
          arrow-up
          2
          ·
          13 hours ago

          Mine works, but I guess it depends on your setup. My main GPU is a 7800XT and my secondary is a 3090 I use for video encode/decode. OBS while streaming and recording simultaneously (if I ever have time), video editing and HandBrake conversions. It just works with EndeavourOS. I can do ray tracing on the 7800 XT but it’s not something I care about in games so I always turn it off.

          I’m sure if I ran dual 3090’s in SLI it would be a pain in the ass but that’s why I didn’t try for that when upgrading my system, plus the power draw.

    • brucethemoose@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      5
      ·
      14 hours ago

      Same. I noticed earlier this month when I got a popup to install Mcafee, out of nowhere. I was mortified.

    • NewNewAugustEast@lemmy.zip
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      12
      ·
      19 hours ago

      I didn’t watch the video, but maybe they said how this done.

      If it installed silently, it must be getting pulled in via Windows update right? Where Microsoft just sees this a regular old driver for a device I would imagine?

      I have an LG monitor, maybe about 5 years or older. But I don’t have windows so I assume it knows nothing.

      EDIT: Nevermind. I went and watched the section at the beginning, and yep that is exactly how it is done. Does windows not even vet what a vendor hands them as a driver? Perhaps they don’t care, but this seems like an easily exploitable route.

      • floofloof@lemmy.ca
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        4
        ·
        14 hours ago

        I suspect the thoroughness of the vetting is inversely proportional to the size of the kickback to Microsoft.

        • NewNewAugustEast@lemmy.zip
          link
          fedilink
          English
          arrow-up
          6
          ·
          14 hours ago

          Got me curious. Quick search and I found three windows drivers that had keyloggers hidden in them. Go figure it was HP!

          • HP Notebook Keyboard Drivers: Keylogging code was discovered in the SynTP.sys file, which was part of the Synaptics Touchpad driver shipped with certain HP notebook models.

          • HP Audio Drivers: Researchers found keylogging features within the Conexant HD Audio Driver (specifically version 1.0.0.46 and earlier) used in various HP laptops and other Windows systems.

    • thejml@sh.itjust.works
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      9
      ·
      19 hours ago

      That’s what I thought was happening here. The headline is a bit incorrect… the monitor didn’t install the bloatware, Windows did.

      Now the drivers/software that Windows installed is likely from the MS store/update path and was made and signed by LG, but still. Plug this monitor into linux and it’s not going to do it because linux doesn’t have that mechanism.

  • dual_sport_dork 🐧🗡️@lemmy.world
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    63
    ·
    20 hours ago

    Not only that but my old LG smart TV (47LM8600, I think manufactured in 2012) has literal suicide timers in its built in apps. Mine has never been connected to any network and yet it mysteriously informed me after approximately three years of ownership that all of its player apps such as Youtube, Hulu, Netflix, etc. would stop working because they were “no longer supported,” all of them within the time frame of the same couple of weeks. It knew this somehow, apparently via magic, or quantum fluctuations, or psychic brain waves. Without internet connectivity.

    Obviously I don’t use any of those features so I didn’t give a rat’s ass and I still don’t. But I still find that deeply suspicious.

    • Elvith Ma'for@feddit.org
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      35
      ·
      18 hours ago

      The only technical explanation that’s not malice would be that some certificate store on the device had expiring certificates and would need an update to continue to function (or rather connect to remote servers).

        • Majestic@lemmy.ml
          link
          fedilink
          English
          arrow-up
          6
          ·
          14 hours ago

          Yes. Certs can expire after whatever time the issuer wants to set for them. That could be six months or 20 years. Some infrastructure has limits on max and min lengths (more max than min usually) but not all and there are best practices as well.

          More importantly the certs could have been five years old by the time this person got the TV for a total age of 8 years.

        • Elvith Ma'for@feddit.org
          link
          fedilink
          English
          arrow-up
          4
          ·
          13 hours ago

          It depends on their use. The most common certificates that you will “use and check” (implicitly) all the time are probably those, that get served by websites and the APIs that apps talk to. Those are usually quite short lived. Let’s Encrypt IIRC issues them with a default life time of ~90 days and there’s a push industry wide to reduce their lifespan generally to… IIRC something around 40 days. But there are more usecases and certificates and those may be valid longer. E.g. a developer that signs their code/compiled binaries.

          Or - and thats more relevant - when you check a certificate you do not only check it’s content, you also check that it was issued and signed by someone “you” trust (or rather the software on your device trusts). Ususally there’s a central store on your PC managed by Microsoft (for Win), Apple (for Mac) or your Linux Distribution with a list of certificates that your device trusts. Those are usually quite long lived (often several years, probably even more than a decade). But will also end. And there will be new ones to replace the old ones. Or new vendors that get added to this trust store. If you do not update your device, this trust store won’t change.

          There are now several versions how this can affect the apps in this case, e.g.

          • They might not be able to talk to servers using “newer” certificates, as they cannot validate them. There might even be the problem, that the update mechanism breaks, as it wouldn’t be able to get updates from the server to get new certs effectively locking you out.
          • They might only allow apps that are signed by them, but their old cert is running out and if it’s invalid, they might prevent the apps from running (as their cert is now untrusted) - note that you can provide ways around that (e.g. checking if the cert was valid when it was issued vs. checking if it would be valid now), but for a device that’s designed to be able to get updates, you might have forgotten that or didn’t think it was an issue or…
    • milk@discuss.tchncs.de
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      6
      ·
      14 hours ago

      There was some controversy a while ago about Samsung TVs finding and connecting to open WiFi networks autonomously if they weren’t connected to a network explicitly

    • FlashMobOfOne@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      14
      arrow-down
      1
      ·
      18 hours ago

      Planned obsolescence is one of those things that just infuriates me so much about capitalism.

      • dual_sport_dork 🐧🗡️@lemmy.world
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        4
        ·
        17 hours ago

        Luckily for me at least, like so many of us dweebs here, I drive my TV with a little media center PC anyway. So I couldn’t care less which of their services they disable. The more the merrier, as far as I’m concerned. The real annoying part is that these don’t work (presumably), but you still can’t remove the icons from the thing’s home screen.

        • FlashMobOfOne@lemmy.world
          link
          fedilink
          English
          arrow-up
          5
          arrow-down
          1
          ·
          17 hours ago

          Same. My TV is a second monitor and really only gets use during football season. Who wants to watch TV in real time anymore anyway?

  • Menschlicher_Fehler@feddit.org
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    70
    ·
    21 hours ago

    Bought a LG TV and a Monitor three years ago. Last time I will do that. Really happy about my decision not to let the TV have access to the internet.

      • Otter@lemmy.ca
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        6
        ·
        13 hours ago

        A lot of bad ones out there, but some are worse than others. For example, I’m not going to consider a Samsung TV because of how many times they’ve done something sketchy

        LG is also falling down the list with this incident

    • zackhow@programming.dev
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      4
      ·
      17 hours ago

      Yep, mine has never reached the internet, it is connected but is blocked at the firewall so I can still hook home assistant up to it.

  • Reygle@lemmy.world
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    22
    arrow-down
    1
    ·
    18 hours ago

    All of this is true but I really hate the headline. Headlines for this SHOULD SAY “Microsoft’s Windows update feature is distributing adware.”

    • brucethemoose@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      2
      ·
      14 hours ago

      This has been going on forever, though. I had an Asus motherboard that literally installed adware, and an even older Sony laptop that topped it.

  • krigo666@lemmy.world
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    28
    arrow-down
    3
    ·
    20 hours ago

    And you think the other manufacturers are different?

    Only solution is NO NETWORK. Use as a simple TV. I have 2 fairly new LGs and none are network connected. They work perfectly that way. I learnt the lesson with my 15y old Samsung SmartTV, one of the first to the market, and it wanted to use a Samsung account for almost everything, even to use the Youtube client. Nope.

    • tburkhol@slrpnk.net
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      22
      ·
      20 hours ago

      These are computer monitors, not TVs. Plugging them into a Windows box triggers Windows to silently install their “driver,” which silently installs a handful of other startup apps. It’s an escalation of the smartTV-wifi path.

    • StarryPhoenix97@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      2
      ·
      edit-2
      13 hours ago

      I grabbed a used Samsung dumb tv off fb market place but I haven’t decided how im going to configure a streaming device to it. All the streaming sticks do the same thing. Building my own sounds like a pain.

      I have a little server but I want a remote and a basically have to make my own box to be able to cut out these 3rd party spies.