Viking_Hippie@lemmy.dbzer0.com to Lemmy Be Wholesome@lemmy.world · 1 day agoUnicorn cakelemmy.dbzer0.comimagemessage-square153linkfedilinkarrow-up11.01Karrow-down136
arrow-up1978arrow-down1imageUnicorn cakelemmy.dbzer0.comViking_Hippie@lemmy.dbzer0.com to Lemmy Be Wholesome@lemmy.world · 1 day agomessage-square153linkfedilink
minus-squareSkaveRat@discuss.tchncs.delinkfedilinkarrow-up2arrow-down2·16 hours agoAh yes. I absolutely was serious when I claimed that the woman went hungry retroactively, because someone told the story about it Damn, got me bro
minus-squareJoeBigelow@lemmy.calinkfedilinkarrow-up2arrow-down1·16 hours agoI don’t understand why you’re trying to justify being perceived as a jerk
minus-squareBitchPeas@lemmy.worldlinkfedilinkarrow-up1arrow-down1·15 hours agoOooh. Your joke wasn’t very clear. Because she did become hungry again, because thats how it works in our linear time. Attributing the act of sharing being something that retroactively removes the action IS absurd, youre right. It just wasn’t a very clearly executed joke. A well placed /s would help. Or further elaboration of the joke to emphasize the absurdity. And again https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Poe's_law
Ah yes. I absolutely was serious when I claimed that the woman went hungry retroactively, because someone told the story about it
Damn, got me bro
I don’t understand why you’re trying to justify being perceived as a jerk
Oooh. Your joke wasn’t very clear. Because she did become hungry again, because thats how it works in our linear time.
Attributing the act of sharing being something that retroactively removes the action IS absurd, youre right.
It just wasn’t a very clearly executed joke.
A well placed /s would help. Or further elaboration of the joke to emphasize the absurdity.
And again https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Poe's_law