• CannedYeet@lemmy.world
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    13
    ·
    edit-2
    13 days ago

    That Bruen case was absolute nonsense. They argued that if no regulations on guns existed in a certain arbitrary time period, that it is unconstitutional to ever have a gun regulation. And then they got the history totally wrong. There were plenty examples of regulations on stuff like open carry. So they got the facts totally wrong!

    • phutatorius@lemmy.zip
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      1
      ·
      12 days ago

      What, you expect good faith from those scheming assholes?

      They’re charlatans who pretend to channel the dead Founders. Except (A) The founders didn’t agree on much; (B) Many of them spoke at length about the need to keep laws updated to meet modern needs; and © The conclusions reached by this bullshit process of divination are always exactly in line with the demands of modern conservative politics, and have little to do with the original intent, to the extent that such a thing can ever have been said to exist.

      What a coincidence.