In late October, Elon Musk released a Wikipedia alternative, with pages written by his AI chatbot Grok. Unlike its nearly quarter-century-old namesake, Musk said Grokipedia would strip out the “woke” from Wikipedia, which he previously described as an “extension of legacy media propaganda.” But while Musk’s Grokipedia, in his eyes, is propaganda-free, it seems to have a proclivity toward right-wing hagiography.

Take Grokipedia’s entry on Adolf Hitler. Until earlier this month, the entry read, “Adolf Hitler was the Austrian-born Führer of Germany from 1933 to 1945.” That phrase has been edited to “Adolf Hitler was an Austrian-born German politician and dictator,” but Grok still refers to Hitler by his honorific one clause later, writing that Hitler served as “Führer und Reichskanzler from August 1934 until his suicide in 1945.” NBC News also pointed out that the page on Hitler goes on for some 13,000 words before the first mention of the Holocaust.

Archive: http://archive.today/aEcz0

  • SabinStargem@lemmy.today
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    2
    ·
    edit-2
    8 months ago

    The man can literally afford to have a legal harem island, fund an entertainment company to create anything to amuse him, AND solve world hunger simultaneously…and he just fawns over Hitler.

    His wealth is truly wasted.

    • LittleBorat3@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      1
      ·
      8 months ago

      Apparently owning the libs, snorting ketamine to the point of pissing yourself and dick jokes are more important than anything you mentioned.

      Also Donald Trump needs a lot of money. The other tech dickheads bending over backwards are not enough.

  • khannie@lemmy.world
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    1
    ·
    8 months ago

    I mean the whole stupid Grokipedia thing is a shit show that will never take off, but Fuhrer is just “leader” in German. In it’s used context for Hitler it straight up means dictator and (iirc) only came into full on use after the plebiscite giving him full dictatorial power after Hindenburg’s death in 1934 (edit: He was already the Reich’s Chancellor and merged in Hindenburg’s powers with the vote to make himself full dictator / Fuhrer).

    I’d welcome input from a German national - Is the word still used there?

  • themurphy@lemmy.ml
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    0
    ·
    8 months ago

    Tbh, from a historical point of view, The Führer was used to describe Hitler. Now in Germany, it’s basically only used to refer to him.

    I’m not for deleting history, and I think the context is important. People needs to know why The Führer or “der Führer” is bad.

    A context which I think would have helped in another example would be the N-word. If everyone was really taught the history around that word, I think/hope alot of people would think twice before using it today.

    Or is that only me?

    • ozymandias@lemmy.dbzer0.com
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      0
      ·
      8 months ago

      honorific one clause later, writing that Hitler served as “Führer und Reichskanzler from August 1934 until his suicide in 1945.”

      if it’s his honorific and not his official title then that should be clarified… Musk is a nazi, i’m sure grokepedia is a bunch of revisionist bullshit, but it’s not really the smoking gun and seems more like grok not groking the difference between his title and nickname.

      also it pisses me off that they stole grok from the hitchhikers guide to the galaxy

  • IRemember@lemmings.world
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    0
    arrow-down
    1
    ·
    8 months ago

    Wow, so Elon Musk has his own Wikipedia alternative? Interesting. But I’m not surprised that it already seems to have some questionable content on it…like referring to Hitler as “the Führer.” That’s not exactly an accurate description of him. And it’s also concerning that the page on him goes on for 13,000 words before mentioning the Holocaust. It’s important to accurately and objectively represent historical figures and events. Hopefully, this Wikipedia alternative will work on improving their content in the future.