A year has passed since Commodore, the computer brand many of you know and love, came back from the dead under new ownership. The comeback is picking up pace too, with a lineup that already includes multiple Commodore 64 Ultimate editions, a C64X PC, and a licensing program that invites outside builders to use the name. Now, they have announced a return to the phone market, and not in the doomscrolling glass-slab avatar we are all used to, but in a retro, very equippable flip phone format…

  • Zink@programming.dev
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    1
    ·
    4 minutes ago

    Price aside, as somebody who has gotten pretty good at ignoring my old normal slab smart phone, this might only make sense for nostalgia and conversation starter reasons.

    Now if I could force this thing upon other people in my life who cannot separate their eyes from their doom-screen, we’d be on to something!

  • bagsy@lemmy.world
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    25
    arrow-down
    1
    ·
    17 hours ago

    I was excited about this until i saw it was $500!! For a freaking flip phone.

    • earthworm@sh.itjust.works
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      36
      ·
      19 hours ago

      That’s a bit far, isn’t it?

      Let’s see what the article actually says…

      Making Flip Phones Great Again
      The Specs
      Get Yours

      This is an advertisement.

      • nevyn@slrpnk.net
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        18
        arrow-down
        1
        ·
        17 hours ago

        “Great again” seems a very tone deaf way of advertising… unless you are trying to advertise against the product, or advertise to inbreds

        • AppleTea@lemmy.zip
          link
          fedilink
          English
          arrow-up
          4
          ·
          14 hours ago

          I don’t think Comodore uses that phrase in its ad copy, the phrasing comes from itsfoss

      • Summzashi@lemmy.world
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        5
        ·
        19 hours ago

        They probably think their audience is here and they’ve been spamming this place so much, it’s insane.

        • other_cat@piefed.zip
          link
          fedilink
          English
          arrow-up
          3
          ·
          18 hours ago

          I have itsfoss in my RSS feed mostly to keep an eye on the FOSS community news in general, but will agree most of their articles seem to lean quite heavily into soft endorsing certain brands.

  • supernight52@lemmy.world
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    170
    arrow-down
    1
    ·
    1 day ago

    Not only are the phones extremely overpriced for what they are- the images they are using for advertising are AI images, and not real pictures. Also using “Make blank great again” format for their tagline is another scoop of excrement on the shit sundae.

    • CosmoNova@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      45
      arrow-down
      3
      ·
      1 day ago

      I had a bad feeling about the whole C64 brand when it got overhauled recently. It had vaporware startup written all over it. Guess my gut feeling was on point once again.

  • Cryxtalix@programming.dev
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    19
    arrow-down
    2
    ·
    20 hours ago

    Using Sailfish OS is just trading Android for another proprietary OS. Why even bother going to all that effort and still end up back in the same place?

    We have real mobile linux distros like postmarket OS and actual open source desktop environments like Phosh or plasma/gnome mobile.

    • I'm Hiding 🇦🇺@aussie.zone
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      5
      ·
      9 hours ago

      Sailfish is not proprietary.

      Lipstick (the UI) is proprietary. The OS itself is not.

      That said, as someone who uses a SailfishOS phone everyday, I both wish Lipstick was OSS and wish this Commodore thing didn’t exist. It’s only going to bring poor publicity to Sailfish due to its stupid pricetag and featureset.

  • Tim_Bisley@piefed.social
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    72
    arrow-down
    2
    ·
    1 day ago

    This phone should cost $150 max. What’s with dumb phones charging smart phone levels of money?

    • plutopos@lemmy.zip
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      3
      ·
      4 hours ago

      For real. You can grab a cheap used phone for 80 bucks, put lineage on it, and never install any apps except for the very basic preinstalled ones. Boom, dumb phone

      • zod000@lemmy.dbzer0.com
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        4
        ·
        24 hours ago

        They are definitely charging way too much, the price and the browser block are the only reasons I am not buying one. I think they could reasonably price it at $250 based on the hardware and that it will certainly be a low production run which massively increases the price. Also, that Sony with SailfishOS is both old (it was released over five years ago) and refurbished, not exactly a fair comparison.

        • CubitOom@infosec.pub
          link
          fedilink
          English
          arrow-up
          7
          ·
          17 hours ago

          I own one but I haven’t put a sim card in it to testbyhe actuall phone aspect yet.

          My initial criticisms are:

          • because each app is in its own jail, there is no way yet to set a global DNS setting like one can do on android
          • there is no native mullvad VPN app
          • all android apps are in the same sandbox, there is no out of the box way to have an android app isolated from others
          • there is no work profile
          • the gesture based ui is weird and id rather have more navigation options.
    • Mihies@programming.dev
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      16
      arrow-down
      1
      ·
      edit-2
      1 day ago

      I love how people throw around “it’s too expensive”. But did you ever try developing a relatively small batch gadget for the market? Plus as others said, it’s not a dumbp phone at all.

      • zod000@lemmy.dbzer0.com
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        16
        ·
        23 hours ago

        Being too expensive doesn’t mean they are necessarily gouging. My wife crochets blankets as a hobby, but she’d have to charge a stupid amount to sell them at a profit if she used decent yarn and valued her time at even minimum wage. Said blanket would be “too expensive” without a doubt.

      • GalacticRobot@lemmy.world
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        4
        arrow-down
        1
        ·
        23 hours ago

        Isn’t there a whole lot of small volume ‘phone’ companies that are charging far less? Nothing Phone, or the plethora of Chinese companies like Unihertz come to mind.

        • noodles@slrpnk.net
          link
          fedilink
          English
          arrow-up
          3
          ·
          19 hours ago

          Sidephone, key phone, ikko one with the optional keyboard, upcoming clicks communicator, and dumber mini are all modern semi-smart keyboard phones at or below their discounted introductory price for the base model, with similar enough specs in most areas. Most of these are on some sort of privacy AOSP rom too.

          And that’s not including all the unihertz, blue fox, and other Chinese phones that would compete

    • yeehaw@lemmy.caOP
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      10
      ·
      1 day ago

      Agree, was thinking the same thing. I would have considered it at that price…

    • FunkyCheese@lemmy.dbzer0.comBanned
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      5
      ·
      1 day ago

      Higher end camera and a HD DAC (maybe high power audio output?)

      Those sorta things are expensive

      Also it runs 99% of android apps

      Probably also a low volume product which increases price

      • Wispy2891@lemmy.world
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        3
        ·
        20 hours ago

        99% of android apps

        I’m certain that the number is inflated by the massive amount of slop and shovelware that is in the play store. The missing 1% is the apps that you actually need, like banking and such

    • thisbenzingring@lemmy.today
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      2
      arrow-down
      1
      ·
      1 day ago

      its an initial offer model and it does look to have lots of modern tech components in it

      the price seems reasonable to me, especially if its got a designer edge to it

  • gnufuu@lemmy.ca
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    51
    arrow-down
    1
    ·
    1 day ago

    From their FAQ:

    Can I install my own apps?

    Web browsers and social media apps are blocked at the system level. Email and work apps are not offered through the Commostore app store, keeping Callback focused on life outside work and feeds.

    Users are still be able to sideload apps outside those that are blocked, using APK installer files, but Callback is designed first and foremost as a calmer, more intentional phone.

    So I can receive an Email but if it has a link to a website I can’t click it? That’s just silly, Commodore. You’re doing a fine job being memeable and appealing to our nostalgia. Trying to “protect us from ourselves” like that kinda destroys that vibe. And no, the inevitable custom ROM circumventing your blocks won’t make up for it.

    • Wispy2891@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      6
      arrow-down
      1
      ·
      20 hours ago

      Web browsers are blocked at the system level

      Did they ever try to use a browser on a 2" clamshell at 480*640 with a T9 keypad??? It’s so painful that it’s already for emergency use only, don’t need to protect me from myself…

    • _NetNomad@fedia.io
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      12
      arrow-down
      1
      ·
      1 day ago

      yeah, i’m intrigued by the idea of a pseudo-“dumb” phone to reduce mindless usage, but this is too restrictive to really work as a phone for a lot of people. those banned work and social apps have and will continue to supplant the phone features of a modern phone. if i got one of these, it would have to be a supplementary device, defeating the whole point! and for those of us who can use a “dumb” phone, they can just got get one for a fifth of a price

    • rImITywR@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      9
      ·
      1 day ago

      So I can receive an Email but if it has a link to a website I can’t click it?

      It says “Email and work apps are not offered through the Commostore app store”. So you can’t receive email unless you sideload an email app. And you could also sideload a browser as well to open a link. At which point you just have a smartphone.

      • gnufuu@lemmy.ca
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        7
        ·
        1 day ago

        You sure you didn’t misread? To me it looks like they allow sideloading Email apps but disallow sideloading web browsers.

          • palordrolap@fedia.io
            link
            fedilink
            arrow-up
            6
            ·
            22 hours ago

            A hard-coded list of known browsers would almost certainly work. There aren’t that many of them. Or better, a list of the common support files that get installed alongside the main browser executable(s), so you can’t just rename the main one and have it work.

            Anything cleverer than that is about as technical as removing the custom OS and installing standard Sailfish.

    • XLE@piefed.social
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      5
      ·
      1 day ago

      Being a flip phone with a T9 keyboard is already a lot of built-in friction. And some people want a device that might intentionally limit them further. But I must admit, this phrasing (and a lot of their phrasing) is kind of weird.

      • ramble81@lemmy.zip
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        9
        ·
        1 day ago

        Funny thing is, a T9 keyboard is actually a selling point for me. Current keyboards suck without any feedback and their prediction always causes so many typos I have to go back and correct. T9 I could type without needing to look at it and know I had it right.

        • XLE@piefed.social
          link
          fedilink
          English
          arrow-up
          2
          ·
          24 hours ago

          Only if the T9 software is good though. KaiOS, a Mozilla initiated project to get web apps on T9 capable phones, absolutely failed with simple things like capitalizing the word “I” for example.

          I didn’t realize how unintuitive dumb phones could be until I was trying to explain different functions that were triggered by different arrow keys on a KaiOS phone to an elderly person

          • zod000@lemmy.dbzer0.com
            link
            fedilink
            English
            arrow-up
            2
            ·
            24 hours ago

            My daughter has a flip phone with KaiOS and she texts well on it, but she also never used the older, better T9 implementations.

            • XLE@piefed.social
              link
              fedilink
              English
              arrow-up
              3
              ·
              21 hours ago

              I swear you have to tap the shift key maybe six times if you use the word “I” in the middle of a sentence. If I use that phone seriously, maybe muscle memory would kick in, but it’s just so unintuitive.

              It’s unfortunate because I swear you can design a feature phone well. There just isn’t a lot of thought put into it now that Android can (or at least could) mostly overshadow that marke.

              • zod000@lemmy.dbzer0.com
                link
                fedilink
                English
                arrow-up
                2
                ·
                21 hours ago

                Back in the day, feature phones were top of the line, and many of them were great, but I suppose that could be nostalgia talking.

    • FunkyCheese@lemmy.dbzer0.comBanned
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      5
      arrow-down
      2
      ·
      1 day ago

      Its not made for you

      Its made for those who wanna listen to music and take a few photos and not spend time on their phone

      • zod000@lemmy.dbzer0.com
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        10
        ·
        24 hours ago

        I am literally that guy, but even I rarely need to look up something simple while I am out of the house. I don’t need to be protected from myself. It is both condescending and dumb.

      • Summzashi@lemmy.world
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        4
        arrow-down
        1
        ·
        20 hours ago

        You forgot lack of discipline. Since that person can literally just do this with any phone.

        • bridgeenjoyer@sh.itjust.works
          link
          fedilink
          English
          arrow-up
          4
          ·
          17 hours ago

          I mean we say this, but I myself cannot do this. Its nearly impossible with a smart phone. Becuase you internally know you can do more.

          Same thing with recording. I like my 4 track tape machine sometimes and I say “I/we are making a song, we have 4 tracks, we will utilize that best we can.”

          Try doing that in a DAW and really restrict it to 4 tracks. I almost guarantee NO ONE would be able to. Theres a reason modern music has over 150 tracks on average (different discussion but its idiotic IMO). Some folks like me need a physical barrier.

    • one_knight_scripting@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      13
      ·
      22 hours ago

      …So is sailfish… But ultimately I think the reason they went with it is that it is much more secure than an android phone as it ensure your privacy is respected. You can still run android applications, but you don’t have to worry about Google apps spying on your activity. Similar to Graphene OS where you can actually manage the permissions of Google apps rather than allowing it to have unfettered access to everything. Or heck, you don’t even need to install any Google application to be able to use either Graphene or Sailfish. To me, they are just better ecosystems. And heck, sailfish isn’t the only one. There is also postmarket os, Mobian, Manjaro ARM, Arch ARM, Ubuntu Touch, PureOS, and many more.

      • coolmojo@lemmy.world
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        6
        arrow-down
        1
        ·
        18 hours ago

        I wouldn’t say that shipping the phone with WhatsApp preinstalled is privacy respecting.

      • poopkins@lemmy.world
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        1
        arrow-down
        2
        ·
        20 hours ago

        Who verifies that the APK is safe to install? Commostore? I’m not putting my trust in that.

        • one_knight_scripting@lemmy.world
          link
          fedilink
          English
          arrow-up
          3
          ·
          17 hours ago

          What about the fact that Sailfish OS uses Alien Dalvik to emulate the apps in an LXC container? More

          This is a company that is committing to never selling customer data and I appreciate that. But yeah, I think blocking Web browsers is maybe a little much. Plus I need Lemmy to get my bean fix 🫘.

          They have created a shit phone, but they are proud of it. It’s essentially a less dumb version of a dumb phone.

          It’s one where you don’t have to worry about someone emailing you after-hours, see your aunt bitching about her 7th husband, or get you distracted when you should be remodeling the house.

          I may not agree with it… I would be more open to A full blown sailfish install, but I see the vision.

          • poopkins@lemmy.world
            link
            fedilink
            English
            arrow-up
            0
            ·
            14 hours ago

            That’s all very well, but containerization is not nearly sufficient for the amount of scam apps being published, which may be designed to deceive, phish or outright perform fraud.

  • Lovable Sidekick@lemmy.world
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    8
    arrow-down
    1
    ·
    21 hours ago

    Commodore fan here, but srsly, the flip design has so much more failable mechanics than a simple rectangular slab. Will anybody buy it except for the nostalgia? I expect that will soon wear off when they realize how much they miss a bigger screen.

    • los0220@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      4
      ·
      18 hours ago

      I had a flip phone once. I kicked it due to being angry that I don’t have a smartphone and it split in two. I was 12 maybe

      Funny enough I could still recieve calls on the bottom half.

  • MalReynolds@slrpnk.net
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    24
    ·
    1 day ago

    Overpriced, stupid marketing, random proprietary crap, mildly interesting form factor, audio jack, microSD (but only 256GB, why?).

    But more linux phones is more linux phones. I’ll pass on it, but I don’t hate it. You could probably just flash vanilla sailfish without much trouble.

        • zod000@lemmy.dbzer0.com
          link
          fedilink
          English
          arrow-up
          4
          ·
          24 hours ago

          I’d be wary of putting more than that on an sdcard anyway, but I am with you. I have far more flacs than would fit within 256GB. I also wouldn’t bother loading up everything on the phone.

    • skankhunt42@lemmy.ca
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      1
      ·
      1 day ago

      This was my thought too. I’m going to wait and try and buy a used one, assuming some people will buy it, use it for a week and look to sell.

  • [object Object]@lemmy.ca
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    16
    ·
    1 day ago

    And when you want more music without algorithms, accounts, or another monthly subscription, just launch the built-in FM radio. Unlimited songs in your pocket, all powered by the MediaTek Helio G81 processor, with efficient passive cooling.

    Why did they ever take this away from us? I was mad when they did.