• Auli@lemmy.ca
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    1
    ·
    19 hours ago

    I don’t know but that isn’t even the issue the guy took code that was in the Linux slicer and used that. They are saying he not sure what their excuse is but they are doing exactly what the Linux slicer does which is AGPL code. He didn’t reverse engineer anything.

    • takeda@lemmy.dbzer0.com
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      1
      ·
      15 hours ago

      What I’m trying to say is AGPL has a clause that if you use AGPL code any code that you add also becomes AGPL and is required to be provided.

      They sometimes call it a viral license for that reason.