• Kokesh@lemmy.world
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    1
    ·
    3 months ago

    Why? Is it just to fuck up the planet with all the energy waste? What would be a logical explanation for this?

  • DarthAstrius@slrpnk.net
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    1
    ·
    3 months ago

    Genuinely who thought AI would be good for creativity? Isn’t the whole idea of AI supposed to be for productivity and sciences?

    What the fuck timeline am I living in?

  • RedGreenBlue@lemmy.zip
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    1
    ·
    3 months ago

    The app can generate copyrighted content

    How are they allowed to do this?

    it can ensure the content never leaves the app

    Really? Isn’t is pretty much standard for social media dwellers to screen cap everything they see?

    • Passerby6497@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      1
      ·
      3 months ago

      The app can generate copyrighted content

      How are they allowed to do this?

      They can’t, based on their premise.

      Either they actually can’t copyright it because it’s AI generated and only human output can be copyrighted, or they’re actually using humans to generate the content, which kinda torpedoes the AI only aspect.

  • ekZepp@lemmy.world
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    1
    ·
    3 months ago

    I was just thinking how great it would be if Google did the same and moved all the AI content from Youtube to a separate platform.

    "Don’t mind me, I’ll stay with this old crappy human content, you go enjoy the cool ai stuff"👍

    • sugar_in_your_tea@sh.itjust.works
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      1
      ·
      3 months ago

      I hate it when management comes asking something like, “how are we planning to use AI?” instead of “what tools would help you be more productive?” The first puts me on the defensive, and my answer is “we’re already using various forms of AI, from machine learning to features our tools have,” and that isn’t a productive conversation. The second question is more useful, since I’ll mention things the asker could actually help with, like feedback from other parts of the company, more budget to hire and promote, etc.

      AI might be the right solution, and it might not, but you won’t get that answer if you ask the wrong question.

  • MagicShel@lemmy.zip
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    0
    ·
    edit-2
    3 months ago

    Well, they clearly have too much money and have lost the thread. I can’t imagine why I would watch such a thing.

    I’m going to bet it’s to provide training data more than anything.

    • msage@programming.dev
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      0
      ·
      3 months ago

      You should not train on AI generated content.

      Also, I expect older generations to fall for this.

      • MagicShel@lemmy.zip
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        1
        ·
        3 months ago

        Not exactly what I had in mind. I was thinking they could use engagement as feedback to the AI so that it starts producing more engagement-bait type content.