• pmjv@lemmy.worldOP
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      2
      ·
      49 minutes ago

      there’s no other real browser on ios, everything is just a gui reskin of safari. afaik there’s no benefit to using anything else.

  • Raccoonn@lemmy.ml
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    65
    arrow-down
    3
    ·
    13 hours ago

    I’ve used Firefox based browsers for as long as I can remember and I’d rather slam my dick in a car door than switch to garbage like brave. Every single one of those browsers is the same bloated Google-flavoured bullshit wearing a different fucking clown costume. Firefox is the only browser that doesn’t make me feel like I’m being rawdogged by corporate spyware every time I open a tab… Piss on carpet !!

    • Zink@programming.dev
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      4
      ·
      12 hours ago

      Yeah, I don’t do web stuff, but I use the browser every day for all the microsoft stuff my employer uses and it’s 99% LibreWolf and then 1% switching to Firefox ESR that cane preinstalled on debian.

      If something didn’t work at that point, I’d probably fire up my Windows VM I use for testing before I’d install even chromium. I’ve installed it before but there’s just no need now.

    • rounding_error@lemmy.today
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      6
      ·
      8 hours ago

      I have brave on Ios and if I’m correct it’s just using Apple’s safari webkit anyways. It’s been a few years since I compared browsers but back then it was the least shit, including firefox and firefox private.

    • yyyesss?@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      4
      ·
      8 hours ago

      is this the one that requires you to log in? i tried one that looks just like that and i loved the design but forced sign-in is a deal breaker for me. how private can it be if it demands to know who i am?

  • jdr@lemmy.ml
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    4
    ·
    10 hours ago

    Software doesn’t exist silly, it’s imaginary, like numbers.

    But browsers are double fake.

    • deathbird@mander.xyz
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      2
      ·
      3 hours ago

      The guy who made it has bad beliefs. It’s good software from what I can tell, and free as in speech and free as in beer, but if you use it you get his bad bigot cooties. You have to use free software by certified free range organic non-bigots or it rubs off on you I guess.

    • zarkanian@sh.itjust.works
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      11
      ·
      9 hours ago

      They do a ton of sketchy shit. I was skeptical, but this article convinced me.

      If you need to use a Chromium browser, there are a shit-ton that aren’t Brave. I use Ungoogled Chromium.

    • w3dd1e@lemmy.zip
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      43
      ·
      13 hours ago

      Aside from the homophobia, Brave also runs an ad network so I’m skeptical about their privacy claims.

    • prunerye@slrpnk.net
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      31
      arrow-down
      7
      ·
      13 hours ago

      Brendan Eich. Specifically his stance against same sex marriage. He was pressured to resign from Mozilla, which he cofounded, due to his support of California’s prop 8. Then he founded Brave. The Brave browser also has some annoying crypto and AI features turned on by default. I think it’s a perfectly fine piece of software. I use it as a second browser.

      • jdr@lemmy.ml
        link
        fedilink
        arrow-up
        6
        arrow-down
        3
        ·
        10 hours ago

        It’s impossible to be good at programming and morality at the same time.

        That’s why I never tried with either.

    • Allero@lemmy.today
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      25
      arrow-down
      4
      ·
      12 hours ago

      Brave was found altering links to some crypto services like Binance to include their referral and basically profit from unknowing users, they also run an ad network, they rely on Chromium, thereby endorsing Google’s dominance over the modern Web, they are very crypto-positive, which is a problem for many in the open-source community, and on top of that, everything else others have said.

      • BigDiction@lemmy.world
        link
        fedilink
        arrow-up
        3
        ·
        9 hours ago

        Vigilink is the vendor they use to do this iirc. Link hijacking for referral revenue is wild thing to base a business on, but I’ve seen more sketch things running around the ad tech industry.

    • Lumisal@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      21
      arrow-down
      1
      ·
      13 hours ago

      Their very shady history + their very bigoted owner + current shady tactics

      Edit: and on top of that it’s Chromium based

    • Allero@lemmy.today
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      11
      arrow-down
      1
      ·
      12 hours ago

      Brave was found altering links to some crypto services like Binance to include their referral and basically profit from unknowing users, they also run an ad network, they rely on Chromium, thereby endorsing Google’s dominance over the modern Web, they are very crypto-positive, which is a problem for many in the open-source community, and on top of that, everything else others have said.

  • yesman@lemmy.world
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    55
    arrow-down
    1
    ·
    18 hours ago

    I don’t understand. Why does Brave not exist? Is it because the developer is a chud? Fair enough. Is it because it’s Chrome? If so, does that apply to Vivaldi?

      • Chaunticleer@lemmy.dbzer0.com
        link
        fedilink
        arrow-up
        28
        arrow-down
        3
        ·
        17 hours ago

        Can somebody explain something stupid to me? What exactly is wrong with Chromium? Does Google have backdoor access to anyone who’s running a Chromium based program or something?

        • grue@lemmy.world
          link
          fedilink
          arrow-up
          26
          ·
          12 hours ago

          What exactly is wrong with Chromium?

          It gives Google hegemony over web standards.

        • dgdft@lemmy.world
          link
          fedilink
          English
          arrow-up
          132
          arrow-down
          1
          ·
          17 hours ago

          They abuse the fuck out of their monopoly, basically.

          They made changes to limit the usefulness of adblockers (Manifest V3), they tried to force a remote attestation API (WEI API) a few years back that would let them do stuff like fully block users who aren’t running locked-down operating systems from using online banking software or accessing Youtube, they added many chrome-specific web APIs that are extremely helpful for fingerprinting and lock users into the chrome ecosystem, etc.

          And if you’re running stock chromium, there’s a fuckton of telemetry calling home to Google servers constantly.

        • BakedCatboy@lemmy.ml
          link
          fedilink
          English
          arrow-up
          76
          arrow-down
          1
          ·
          17 hours ago

          As a web dev I hate the trend of websites relying on chromium-specific quirks, there are a handful of sites I need to use which refuse to work in any non-chromium browser, and customer support will always tell you to just use chrome as if you’re not a normal person for using Firefox. So yeah what’s wrong with chromium to me is that it’s the new internet explorer when it comes to web standards. Websites and large businesses can afford to just not care if they are following web standards as long as it works in chrome, and if you have a problem it’s your fault for not using chrome.

          • almost1337@lemmy.zip
            link
            fedilink
            arrow-up
            19
            ·
            13 hours ago

            Yeah, we’re back to the days of websites only supporting Internet Explorer because of proprietary features and weird quirks.

          • KindaABigDyl@programming.dev
            link
            fedilink
            arrow-up
            2
            arrow-down
            18
            ·
            14 hours ago

            This is why I switched from LibreWolf. If I had to have a Chromium browser installed as a backup anyway for few important sites, I might as well use Chromium. Imo Chromium has won. It owns the web landscape. I’ve given up

            • Lemmayng@lemmy.world
              link
              fedilink
              English
              arrow-up
              6
              ·
              11 hours ago

              Why don’t you at least use Ungoogled Chromium, Cromite, or Helium Browser? At least they prioritize security and privacy equally while not being tied to Ghoulgle.

        • rozodru@piefed.world
          link
          fedilink
          English
          arrow-up
          10
          ·
          11 hours ago

          which you can get on any Chromium based browser, brave is nothing special in that regard. you can have functioning adblock with Vivaldi also.