• 🌸𝓯𝓵𝓸𝔀𝓮𝓻🌸@sh.itjust.works
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    33
    ·
    2 days ago

    Is AI the final bubble they’ll inflate? Usually some new tech gets hyped when the old tech fails. See the progression through deep learning, Blockchain, NFT. Or will they do robotics and suddenly it’s robots everywhere. Maybe quantum computing.

    • vathecka@lemmy.radio
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      1
      ·
      3 hours ago

      Ai Is also a highly specialized technology with a limited number of use cases. though you cant brute force improvement through scaling like you can with ai, so it wouldnt be as good of an investment capital black hole

    • TankovayaDiviziya@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      13
      arrow-down
      1
      ·
      1 day ago

      Quantum computing will only be useful to a handful of people instead of mass consumer use. Quantum computers are mainly for cybersecurity.

      • TheVoiceOfRaison@thelemmy.club
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        4
        ·
        1 day ago

        Quantum processors are already a thing. I dont think we’ll see quantum powered consumer products for a while but I think they will eliminate the need for massive data centres and should be way better for the environment.

        • mnemonicmonkeys@sh.itjust.works
          link
          fedilink
          English
          arrow-up
          4
          arrow-down
          1
          ·
          1 day ago

          I dont think we’ll see quantum powered consumer products for a while

          Or ever. Quantum processors have to operate close to 0k to work

          • felbane@lemmy.world
            link
            fedilink
            English
            arrow-up
            1
            ·
            6 hours ago

            Idk, Miles Dyson was able to engineer a neural-net processor with room temperature superconductors all the way back in 1995…

            • mnemonicmonkeys@sh.itjust.works
              link
              fedilink
              English
              arrow-up
              2
              ·
              1 day ago

              When it comes to tech, id never say never.

              Eh, there is a degree to that, but there’s also the fact that you can’t just break thermodynamics. With quantum effects you need to remove a lot of noise, and near-0k temperatures will do that.

              Not only that, is there even a practical purpose to getting quantum computing on an individual level? While it’s better for specialized problems, current transistor tech is way better at general use cases and is good enough that we don’t really need significantly more power. And even if it was technologically possible to shrink dpwn quantum computing enough to fit in a desktop of phone, what’s going to be the cost of it compared to transistors?

      • billwashere@lemmy.world
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        2
        ·
        1 day ago

        Yeah. I mean blockchain is sorta resource intensive but more distributed. Crypto is basically the same thing. AI requires gigawatts of power, is disrupting almost every tech based manufacturing, uses tons of natural resources. All to create terrible content, hallucinate completely made up answers, and automate things to destroy themselves. Great idea guys.

        Do get me wrong, I’m not totally against AI. I think it can be a useful tool especially if sandboxed and run locally. But these giant data centers sucking up all the electricity and water are just no bueno.