• lando55@lemmy.zip
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      7
      ·
      3 hours ago

      When the junior devs get too expensive they can outsource all of their software development to Bangladesh

      • Prox@lemmy.world
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        2
        ·
        39 minutes ago

        When offshore-sourced code gets too shitty they can hire some senior engineers to rebuild it in a way that’s compatible with the rest of their ecosystem.

  • UnspecificGravity@piefed.social
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    52
    arrow-down
    1
    ·
    6 hours ago

    Gonna be hilarious when the people who haven’t been paying attention realize that they just replaced workers with shit that doesn’t work AND actually costs more.

    • disorderly@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      23
      ·
      5 hours ago

      Yep, I’ve been telling anyone who’ll listen that if you really want to drop juniors and give tools to seniors, then you have to pay the monthly cost (whatever it will be) and you have to be ready to foot the big bill in 5 years when your seniors (with no candidate replacements) say they’ll take a 50% raise or walk.

  • Fedditor385@lemmy.world
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    22
    ·
    6 hours ago

    This is the right way to go. This will incentivize many companies to rethink their strategy, and slow down or scale down AI adoption. After that and the revenue drops for many AI companies, they will back off purchasing all possible RAM and storage in existence which will drive down pricing. And when the prices get to normal again, we will simply buy more RAM for our local machines and run free models.

    This news kinda makes me happy. Shit’s starting to fall apart. Finally.

  • Eager Eagle@lemmy.world
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    75
    arrow-down
    1
    ·
    8 hours ago

    Users on annual Pro or Pro+ plans will remain on their existing plan with premium request-based pricing until their plan expires, however, model multipliers will increase on June 1 (see table).

    holy shit, 9x the previous cost. which was already not great. I was on the fence about cancelling it, but thanks for making up my mind, MS

    • Pumpkin Escobar@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      8
      ·
      3 hours ago

      I love that their email made it sound like it was a wash, like “we’re just changing our billing model, you’ll get credits now, samesies!” but then this pricing chart buried 3-levels down from the announcement lays out just how much less you’re going to get for the same price.

      I wonder about all the startups who were bragging about their $10k/month AI coding bills being the best money they ever spent. When this new pricing kicks in and pushes it to $40k/month right around the time all the vibe-coded shit blows up their codebase, I wonder if they’ll still be so happy with their choices.

      I interviewed for a place a while back and started asking about quality and velocity and how they balance it with AI developer tools, he said something like “One of our developers closed 400 PRs last month” and I instantly knew it was definitely not the place for me.

      • trem@lemmy.blahaj.zone
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        3
        ·
        1 hour ago

        So, did they use AI tools to type “LGTM” 400 times or nah?

        But yeah, I also find that frustrating. Management just looks at terrible metrics like PRs closed or lines of code produced.
        It’s not even novel that you can produce terrible code very quickly. Decades ago, our industry learned that it isn’t worth it, because you suffer for it later. Now the game is altered slightly and management demands that we throw all these learnings out the window.

    • [object Object]@lemmy.ca
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      4
      ·
      3 hours ago

      They should really describe this as you’re on the same plan, but your plan gives you 80-88% less use.

    • Rhaedas@fedia.io
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      21
      ·
      7 hours ago

      That’s been their business model for a while now. “Here’s something you also didn’t ask for”

    • unitedwithme@lemmy.today
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      1
      ·
      7 hours ago

      You’re looking at Claude, I don’t See Copilot

      Edit: ignore me, I finally reviewed the article and is through GH, not actual MS 365 page.

    • XLE@piefed.social
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      34
      ·
      7 hours ago

      The good news is that none of the companies pushing these products have created the dependency yet, and they are running out of venture capital almost too fast to have the option.

      • henfredemars@infosec.pub
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        14
        ·
        7 hours ago

        I really hope you’re right. My employer is using it as a crutch. I don’t think they can stop using AI because they just don’t have enough skilled employees to deliver on their commitments. They would pay nearly any price, and I’m sure they’re not alone.

          • boonhet@sopuli.xyz
            link
            fedilink
            English
            arrow-up
            7
            ·
            6 hours ago

            That costs actual money though

            For the cost of one employee you can give 5 employees AI and tell them to work 10x faster while they have to wrestle the stupid AI.

            • XLE@piefed.social
              link
              fedilink
              English
              arrow-up
              4
              ·
              4 hours ago

              You aren’t wrong, but even if LLMs didn’t exist, employers would invent a scapegoat to make the same demands of their employees.

  • Ilixtze@lemmy.ml
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    15
    ·
    6 hours ago

    Getting de-skilled is starting to look like a very expensive gamble and this is just the first price hike, expect more to come. And expect them to criminalize open source models as well with some national security concerns or something.

  • [object Object]@lemmy.ca
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    18
    ·
    7 hours ago

    Inline completions are genuinely useful, I’m mostly replacing them with local models though. They are slower but free as in beer (once you pay the hardware cost).

      • [object Object]@lemmy.ca
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        3
        ·
        4 hours ago

        I’m using vim with minuet-ai, and it plugs the AI suggestion into my completion module. I found the Copilot style virtual text interfaces all janky.

      • [object Object]@lemmy.ca
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        4
        ·
        5 hours ago

        Sure, but hopefully small code completion (2-4b range) models can run locally on a lot of things. They’re just less good.

  • BannedVoice@lemmy.zip
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    13
    ·
    7 hours ago

    Claude is cutting back on usage policy for pro users…

    GitHub CoPilot is now doing it too…

    It’s not hard to see the future, AI companies bought up all the RAM creating a shortage which raises prices for all of us across the board.

    Now they’re going to throttle and limit access to it behind a paywall per transaction. The future is so stupid. Can we just go back to dial up internet and IRC? It was a much simpler time.

  • unitedwithme@lemmy.today
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    19
    ·
    8 hours ago

    Of course it is… Funny though, bc nobody really uses it at work, so our pricing should theoretically go down… But I doubt it, MS will find a way to make it go up

  • vala@lemmy.dbzer0.com
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    9
    arrow-down
    1
    ·
    7 hours ago

    Well, I’m officially canceling my GH copilot sub. Wtf is this?

    Been feeling like we were going to see a cheap ai compute rug pull soon.

    Imagine paying for gpt-4o in 2026.

    • calcopiritus@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      27
      ·
      6 hours ago

      Wtf is this?

      The most foreseeable event of the last 20 years.

      Massive out of this world investment + no demand = prices so cheap they were operating at a huge loss

      Operating at a huge loss + time = huge enshittification

      Raising prices is the easiest form of enshittification. Ads are coming too. Lastly it will be degrading features. Incorporating more features that no one wants, and bundling with other services that no one wants.