• GreenBeanMachine@lemmy.world
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    12
    arrow-down
    14
    ·
    edit-2
    2 days ago

    Would they have chosen anyone else to lead the push for AI?

    I for one am completely convinced that Tim Cook is “leaving” because he wasn’t pushing AI as hard as the shareholders wanted. They think they’re falling behind, which in a way they are (but that’s a good thing IMO), and now they’re experiencing FOMO, as shareholders do.

    • SaraTonin@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      12
      arrow-down
      4
      ·
      edit-2
      2 days ago

      Federighi is the one who talked Cook in to moving the company towards AI, and he’s the person who was put in charge of the AI-ification of Siri when the previous fly was let go. Turnus is a hardware guy. The two things he’s most responsible for are Apple Silicon and AirPods.

      Oh, and he was the one who pushed for the Macbook Neo, which has been hugely successful -commercially, in terms of reception, and has even had CEOs of other companies like Dell saying it’s a serious threat to their business

      • GreenBeanMachine@lemmy.world
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        6
        arrow-down
        13
        ·
        2 days ago

        Cool. And now he’s gonna be in charge of enshitifiying products with AI.

        Tim left at a good time, and clearly he wasn’t a big fan of AI in its current state, hence the replacement.

        • SaraTonin@lemmy.world
          link
          fedilink
          English
          arrow-up
          4
          arrow-down
          4
          ·
          1 day ago

          There’s no indication that cook is leaving because of Apple Intelligence. It’s been rumoured for ages that he was leaving, to be replaced by Ternus

          You’re just choosing to believe whatever you want to believe, facts be damned

        • Aatube@lemmy.dbzer0.com
          link
          fedilink
          English
          arrow-up
          4
          arrow-down
          4
          ·
          1 day ago

          when questioned, you have not given a source that john apple is more pro-AI

          in fact the article you posted believes he’ll continue tim apple’s path:

          “By choosing a hardware leader in John Ternus, Apple may be signaling that it still believes the future of AI will run through tightly integrated devices, not just software,” said Timothy Hubbard, assistant professor of management at the University of Notre Dame.

          i don’t think locally-run AI is enshittification since unlike e.g. satellite connection, local LLM does not have additional costs of connecting to a remote service

    • mabeledo@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      7
      arrow-down
      4
      ·
      1 day ago

      There have been rumors of Cook retiring for the past five years, at least, and I’m pretty sure that shareholders are quite happy with Apple market cap at almost $4 trillion.

      It has nothing to do with AI.

    • blitzen@lemmy.ca
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      3
      arrow-down
      3
      ·
      2 days ago

      I’m not sold on the idea that’s why Cook is leaving, but I’m with you that Apple may be slow playing the push into AI. If they are dragging their feet, I actually appreciate it.

      • SCmSTR@lemmy.blahaj.zone
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        4
        arrow-down
        1
        ·
        2 days ago

        All they would have to do is make a stance:

        “We Are Pro Privacy and Anti AI”

        And their popularity would skyrocket.

        • blitzen@lemmy.ca
          link
          fedilink
          English
          arrow-up
          1
          arrow-down
          2
          ·
          2 days ago

          And their stock would plummet. The stock market is irrational, and is heavily invested in AAPL.

          I would love it, but the board/shareholders would oust any CEO who took that path.

          • SCmSTR@lemmy.blahaj.zone
            link
            fedilink
            English
            arrow-up
            3
            ·
            2 days ago

            It might take a dip, but if people responded very positively, maybe Apple could benefit from taking some risk on morally good things. Imagine if stockholders saw that. Apple stock would explode.

            • blitzen@lemmy.ca
              link
              fedilink
              English
              arrow-up
              1
              arrow-down
              3
              ·
              edit-2
              1 day ago

              Have you paid attention to the stock market? It absolutely wouldn’t respond like that.

              I mean, I wish it would react like you suggest, but I’m not optimistic enough to believe that it would.