- cross-posted to:
- [email protected]
- cross-posted to:
- [email protected]
He said that the tariff is $1 per barrel of oil, adding that empty tankers can pass freely. “Once the email arrives and Iran completes its assessment, vessels are given a few seconds to pay in Bitcoin, ensuring they can’t be traced or confiscated due to sanctions,” Hosseini added.
Bitcoin finely found a use case that’s not crime. Take that crypto haters.
Purchasing drugs for yourself shouldn’t be a crime, so it’s awesome that cryptocurrencies exist for this purpose.
The (non-financial) crime is the best part.
I love taking estrogen I bought offa onion sites :)
Be careful with your sources. Laced drugs are dangerous. But I’m with you.
Technically it still is a crime since charging money for access to navigable waters is a violation of international law.
What about Panama Canal, Suez canal, St Lawrence Seaway? Is it fine to charge money for those waters?
They’re not natural waterways, somebody had to make them so the law doesn’t apply. Same for Great Lakes Waterway.
Besides, international law only applies to you if you agree to it. Both US and Iran do not agree with this.
US also has a law that say US can use military force against the ICC if any US citizen is arrested by the ICC.
That’s not true. Customary international law also applies to states, that are not themselves members of a treaty. In the case of international maritime war and international humanitarian laws this is widely accepted as such.
International laws have no meaning if nations don’t agree to it.
For example, the United States has laws and policies designed to prevent the arrest of U.S. personnel and its allies by the International Criminal Court (ICC). The 2002 American Service-Members’ Protection Act (ASPA) authorizes the US President to use “all means necessary and appropriate” to release U.S. or allied personnel detained by the ICC, often termed the “Hague Invasion Act”.
Maybe that used to be the case but the USA does it different
International law is more like a code of conduct. Also as with most laws, if you’re powerful enough you can ignore the law.
It’s not like international law protected them in the first place.
Which law?
This would be the United Nations Convention on the Law of the Sea (UNCLOS). It’s interesting that the US is among the nations that have never ratified the treaty.
Also, Denmark has a long 500+ year history of charging ships to transit in and out of the Baltic Sea, so this really isn’t a new concept (Sound Tolls).
I thought they meant this law but wasn’t sure. That treaty has not been ratified by the US, Pissrael and most importantly, Iran! So it doesn’t apply and we are talking about a war where neither the invading nations nor the victim nation has signed it.
https://www.simplelaw.blog/p/the-strait-of-hormuz-a-3-minute-international
There used to be hundreds of cases of charges for transit. Led to wars too.