Pennomi

It’s probably not, look at the capital E’s. But I’m willing to overlook that in general if that’s the only issue.

AI generated? I’m unsure, but the “almost typography yet not” lettering makes me think so.

BRB, dying with unfinished business

Or as I’ve recently taken to calling it, Stone plus Henge. Henge is not a prehistoric megalith unto itself, but rather another free component of a fully functioning Stone system made useful by the Stone corelibs, shell utilities and vital system components comprising a full megalithic structure as defined by neolithic hunter-gatherers.

I totally agree. It’s the type of attack virtually anyone can pull off solo with just a couple thousand dollars. You don’t even need a lot of engineering skills, battle-ready quadcopters are available off the shelf. The only thing that would be difficult is the payload, and there are plenty of people capable of making a pipe bomb.

Everyone should watch the short film Slaughterbots, I think it does a good job of explaining. https://youtu.be/HipTO_7mUOw

Sorry that’s the only way. I don’t make the rules.

Play a Pokémon game

gnuplestiltskin

Reality is the opposite though. GPT5 is expert in a pretty wide amount of trivia. It’s better than the average uneducated person in every subject, but worse than an expert in every subject.

I’m done with this conversation now because you’re being willfully ignorant (as expected). One quote talking about characteristics is out of context for this discussion. There is a wealth of other context here that you are intentionally ignoring, specifically the many parts showing that scientists do not all agree with a reductionist definition only considering gametes. Your claim that no other definition makes sense is absolute bullshit in the scientific community and you should be ashamed for pretending it’s the only definition out there.

I know you’re just here for the argument, and I’ve wasted enough time on this already. The “gamete size” simplification is Trumpist propaganda and not based in actual rigorous science.

Actual biologists agree that bodies without sex organs don’t fit into the binary definition

Hormone expression (in addition to gamete size) is also a critical factor that scientists use to define sex

Determining “organization” in cases of “physical anomaly” via chromosomes is unreliable

1.3% of people are born intersex, and “intersex” represents an entire continuum

Educate yourself.

That’s not true, there are definitely people both without any sex organs whose body “organization” has no concept of producing any gametes. There are people who are able to produce both gametes. Sticking your fingers in your ears and shouting LALALA does not make these people magically disappear. You cannot argue “well part of their body organization is invalid because of reasons”.

This is classic Dunning-Kruger shit where just because you learned a little about gametes you think you’re an expert, but there’s a huge world of exceptions out there.

That’s a ridiculous definition conjured up by people trying to claim there’s only two sexes. It has effectively no practical use considering gametes on their own are useless for reproduction without an entire system of hardware surrounding them. Plus it guarantees at least three sexes - people who don’t produce gametes at all.

If you are worried about too many furries in your line of work, try changing jobs! Maybe get into IT or something?

He didn’t have the time to draw, he was compiling his own OS before breakfast.