

Cheaper to just interview random couples.


Cheaper to just interview random couples.


Sure. But they were responding to the claim that “we know tires and break dust is a cause of autism”. Not “there seems to be a correlation, so maybe we should err on the side of abundant caution and treat it as if it’s causal when drafting public policy.” The correction was warranted.


Worst deleted scene from Silo.


You misspelled drugs, tv, and orgasms.
Spotify
My NAS isn’t big enough.


It is forbidden.


Perhaps the cups with one hole are the real solo cups.


This is like a weird special case of don’t let the perfect be the enemy of the good. But with disdain.


I think it’s implied they’re talking about centering both horizontally and vertically. And probably with unknown height.
Still easy these days , though.


Therapists deal with angry action potentials.
I’ve said it of Buffy.
Then they asked the wrong question.


How do you see unfolding?
Martial law to respond to ice agents being killed or police turning against them.
They’re already trying to instigate this.
How do different opposition groups respond such as the DNC?
“The Supreme Court says it’s ok, so our hands are tied, but we’re very upset.”
They already have the Supreme Court on their team.
What about blue states?
Governors will either roll over or start a hot civil war.
Which do you think they’ll choose?
How does the administration handle it without losing popular consensus?
By arresting and murdering protesters.
They’ve already identified vague groups like antifa as domestic terrorists.
If they use the military, how do they get the military stay the path when the populous begins to reject their intervention?
If you give ICE a large enough budget, they can act as a new military. And by firing non-loyal brass for not being able to do enough pushups and replacing them with loyalists, you can keep the military from intervening under the guise of neutrality.
1SO2SO3SO