About sums it up:)

So you have no evidence or anything else of substance to prove that your statements are true. Have a good day

Lol. Once again: I am not getting an explanation, see hallucinated functions and packages (that never happened, right?)

I know what I am doing, which is exactly why I get paid for my code.

And we know a lot more about how we think than you imagine, lol. Like, humans do not think in words. But you did not know that, did you?

Except you are not getting an explanation. Sheesh, do we really need to go all over the “token prediction machine is unable to understand” iteration, again?

Well, at least we can agree GNOME devs aren’t someone either of us would like to work with

Missing features? Be grateful for it!

I wish I could upvote this multiple times

It is hilarious to see linux-scary-because-terminal heads and then this

Well…

case 1: I know beforehand that this is going to be an interview to look at how good I am at reasoning. No problem, give me the question about bus to fill with balls

case 2: this is going to be a more informal interview, question goes in the same list as “your name, what were you doing at your previous job, did you work with X… by the way, what about switches and bulbs” - nope. That means interviewer did a lousy job at preparing for interview, so who is wasting whose time - up to me to decide on the spot

No shit, Sherlock ©

Then you should better your skills at understanding written text. Good luck

I can go ahead and just not use Rust to begin with, what is your point?

Lol. Thanks for the trip in your dreams, but that will be enough for me. Have a good day

or that I don’t want to twist my brain with Rust way of things. But I agree with you on everything else :)

I am not gonna look for first x= expression when I want to know type

Sorry for intrusion, but mhm, nah. I get it there are people who want to play around and have language/compiler babysit them, but there are also people like me who want to see exactly what something is. So no, Rust, just like JavaScript, can be liked by some people, but it is in no way something that has “best type system”

There actually is no such thing as best type system, same way there is no such thing as best language

Tell me this is sarcasm

gobject [Gobject]

Nailed it with the last sentence