Yes, I definitely had a long term strategy when posting an internet comment.

But please do elaborate what my “stance on general purpose computing” is? Genuinely curious.

My feeling is you’re pro general purpose computing and against censorship. Which is why it’s strange to see you make fun of a provider for not censoring their product enough. I was referring only to that part of the article.

I see your stand from the comment above though, I’m not going to argue that. Peace.

There wasn’t, but it’s not the first article you wrote that I read, and I know your stance on general purpose computing. Why is a general purpose language model somehow a bigger problem?

that is so hilariously unsafe that its guardrails can be subverted by a tactic a 13-year-old uses when they want to prank-call someone. And that Anthropic refuses to take responsibility for that unsafe product.

We should ban general computing too, it’s scary how unsafe these things are!

Woah, I thought it was satire about a hypothetical systemd version in 5 years. Then I saw the comments here.

Tbh i never checked what this means, found it somewhere in the arch wiki when i was trying out arch

I can hear the SYYU sound it makes chasing them

How do you imagine Debian maintains that huge repository? Corporate office workers with nicely trimmed beards and expensive suits sitting in air conditioned Debian HQ?

Bluesky user discovers futures

I don’t believe audiovoodoo but maybe he wants to achieve beamforming, which is a real thing, that’s how synthetic aperture radars work, as well as the latest Wi-Fi standards