

First Na Meat eh? 🍖
Honestly I don’t think I’ve even heard of the .family TLD and im a tech worker.
I’m not surprised that a gear head autocompleted it in his mechanical brain to something completely else. Maybe he’s been replaced by AI.
The username is the joke.
I’m not putting in more effort than you clowns unless I feel like it lol


First Na Meat eh? 🍖
Honestly I don’t think I’ve even heard of the .family TLD and im a tech worker.
I’m not surprised that a gear head autocompleted it in his mechanical brain to something completely else. Maybe he’s been replaced by AI.


The thing is that the consumers of DRAM aren’t just home users, it’s businesses. Businesses all over the world literally can’t absorb hundreds of dollars of extra cost. I’ve set standards for global computing at a business with offices in all continents except antarctica, Dell can handle giving you a global price but you can’t just ship a $1000 laptop to a business in sao paolo and expect the business there to be able to afford it, the margins are not like the US or Europe.
Prices will come down much faster than people think imo. We’ll see a flood of slower DDR5 from substandard processes first, but I would be amazed if in 2027 AI spend is even half of what it was this year.


In the span of 5 to 10 years, do you think there will not be a return to consumer production?
I’d love to see someone explain to me how the current rate of AI capex will continue to grow in that time span, and how it will be financed. I don’t think it’s feasible.
Manufacturing capacity though doesn’t seem very limited in that kind of time scale, it just needs investment and time to expand. Once it’s there… if it’s not used it’s lost profits. AI hardware deliveries are at an all time high but sentiment has been on shaky ground on the investor side starting this year.
The three memory producers have always exploited market disruption for profits, generally cooperatively. They’re really good at profiting during all disruptions which just happen with newer technology. It doesn’t last.


Flip the script man.
Imagine if enabling AI was like two check boxes and it’s on, for those people who really want it.
Sounds great.


This is the wrong fucking outcome…
The verdict should have been what protects consumers the most, not what benefits advertisers the most. Apple should have been forced to add the same privacy inquiries to their own first party apps.


It’s like saying cosmic is optional on Pop_OS.
Sure, you can rip it out if you really try… but is it really optional?


IT departments are under a lot of pressure by business leadership to have AI offerings. Most businesses are asking to implement a buzzword, not solve any kind of business challenge.
Yeah, even if this is approved in some form… growing new teeth for young children is not the same as for adults. Very weird this is the population they’re testing on. I’d think they would be testing on people with 10+ missing teeth in their 40s, 50s, 60s+
Again, not for us.