Ah, but “visible light” as a category is human-centric in that it’s based only on which wavelengths of electromagnetic radiation our eyes can detect or “see”. Other species can see more or different wavelengths, such as UV.

*snort*

Or they could’ve kept it to themselves and made the owner pay for more tests but they chose not to.

Anyway: Not sure if serious.

I’m going to assume they’ll have a separate instance. What they want it to do, who tf knows.

Don’t know what difference that makes but in your wisdom there surely is a reason so I’m not going to argue.

I love how proud you are of your own comments. Aspirational. We should all screenshot our own comments and put each of them in its own dedicated post.

Alright, I can see you’re not actually interested in the conversation we were having.

Do you think that might be because it made sense in the context? Because it was relevant to the topic?

Cool, thanks for the advice. I find just not using it works fine. Also seems to help with staying on topic in a conversation and not shoving my medical history into everything.

Well? What’s it saying?

We’re obviously talking about ideal situations because it is impossible in a normal conversation to acknowledge every single aberration. Regardless, if you learn by looking at the solution and going “i understand”, you’re doing yourself a disservice.

Sure. Most people learn best using variations on task solving.

See, a teacher will give you a task to solve, preferably on your own, to teach you a thing. They won’t give you a task and the solution so you can look at the solution and go “ah, yes, I understand”.

Why am I getting the word “prototype”? The spirits are saying “prototype”. That mean anything to you?

Okay, yeah, what confuses me most is why they used different labels. If I had to take a guess (gun to my head), I’d say one is an earlier version that got stuck in some cache somewhere.

Yes, I know that. How does that explain this?

But why? I honestly can’t think of a reason to do this deliberately? Must be some fuck up somewhere?

“omg they understood the stupid nonsense in my head AND they agree that it’s funny i love them ❤️❤️❤️”

Just ask chatgpt to do that.

Admittedly, I could be smarter and/or less sleep deprived, then maybe I wouldn’t be having trouble taking in all the technical information. So I’m not saying this is a bad article. But is there a thesis hidden somewhere (even a tl;dr, as the cool kids say)? I made it about half-way through without knowing what the actual problem is before I gave up (see above lack of smarts and sleep). I THINK it’s suboptimal audio quality? (Which, admittedly again, probability says it is, given this is about headphones)

tl;dr: me no brain good but me interested, eli5?