It seems it requires you don’t mount the EFI system partition over /boot so it’s included in snapshots, and systemd-boot doesn’t support booting from arbitrary partitions

How do you roll back in the grub menu? Is that a feature of grub?

When I update the kernel it replaces both options in systemd-boot so rolling back snapper is a scary endeavor due to kernel - system mismatchs

Am I not allowed to be infuriated on the mildly infuriating community? I don’t care why it was put in there or if they’re going to remove it after seeing this post. I’m here to vent because I find it scammy to force this on every player (most of which didn’t even play multiplayer) despite not even listing it on the store page like they’re supposed to.

I was going to say they should go porcelain if it’s in location but I guess they don’t trust kids with them. Can’t stop thinking of microplastics tho

I was today years old when I learned Doom has a multiplayer… I doubt many people buy this for its multiplayer. They could selectively ask those who click on the multiplayer if that was their concern.

Looking at achievement stats, 32% of people finished the campaign while 12% of people won a multiplayer match. So I’m not alone in thinking of Doom as a single player game

Probably bought this as part of a bundle a long time ago. And I don’t feel like spending time pirating it while it’s already installed

I tried reading them and it didn’t even scroll to show the rest.

wdym reusable? You take it back to the restaurant next time you go? You eat in and they collect it after you leave?

What does it mean by fruit? The entries thing or just the fleshy parts excluding the core?

She forgot ‘a’. He started a baking school

What made you think I was proposing a scheme compliant with the bill? I repeatedly said that this would be to prevent such a bill from passing. And explained my reasoning why it would do so.

To make it doubly clear: I don’t support what they’re trying to do. I just think it could do us good to ourselves address any legitimate concerns they use as excuses to implement surveillance so it’s harder to use them as excuses.

As far as I know self regulation by media industries implementing age labels prevented these kinds of “think of the children” bills before. No idea where you got the corporations having private information from, the entire idea is that it would be open source so we can know that it’s not doing anything shady.

Politicians pushing for these bills don’t care about the excuse they present, but the reason they can repeatedly use the same excuse is because it is a legitimate concern for people. I don’t think digging our heels in to refuse a solution even if it were to align with our stated principle of preserving privacy helps us in the public consciousness.

even worse invasions of privacy

“worse” isn’t accurate as the entire point is that it would be designed to be non-invasive (for people who don’t have csam anyways). Of course they’ll keep trying to invade our privacy but with the example of a solution that doesn’t use mass surveillance for something they tried to push surveillance for, they’ll have less leg to stand on.

Can we take an ‘industry regulates itself’ approach to this? Make a foss csam hash scanner and include it in aosp. When they try to pass these show them that it already exists. That way we at least have some transparency to what it does

I’ve clicked through the links and the most ‘evil’ thing they did seems to be using a non-mainstream open source licence? Evil is getting contracted by Israel. Prohibiting other companies from profiting off your work isn’t evil.

Edit: And they hosted an interview with Curtis Yarvin. That’s bad, but still doesn’t warrant calling them evil.