Here’s a better link where you can download the full PDF Drug harms in the UK: A multi-criterion decision analysis

Sorry to hear about your father.

I believe the study considered everything you mentioned, you can see the categories in this graph:

PDF of the study is available: Drug harms in the UK: A multi-criterion decision analysis

Studies in the UK show that there are three classes of ‘hard’ drugs - alcohol, amphetamines, and opioids.

All three roughly follow the ‘10% rule’: 10% of people who try these drugs become addicted, and 10% of addicts die from their addiction.

Meth, heroin, and alcohol each kill about 1% of the people who try them.

Drug harms in the UK: a multicriteria decision analysis

There have been many studies on this subject (none in the US, since we are under strict prohibition). They calculate both harm to user and harm to society.

Almost all these studies are in agreement that there are three classes of ‘hard’ drugs that are significantly worse than the rest- opioids, amphetamines, and alcohol. Many rate alcohol as slightly more destructive than the other two.

Tobacco is rated significantly less harmful, mostly because of the amount of tobacco it takes to do harm. No one dies from a single night of heavy smoking; many people die from a single night of alcohol, amphetamines, or opiates. Second-hand smoke is dangerous, but not nearly as dangerous as a drunk driver.

Personally I think these studies underrate benzodiazipines, they should be considered the fourth class of hard drugs imo.

I think the best evidence of this, and an accurate predictor of economic recession, is the number of people taking the LSAT.

According to LSAC, the number of test takers is up 19% this year, and applications are up 44.5% over the 4-year average.

The number of legal jobs only increases by ~1% each year.

Yea the subsidies disproportionately benefit the large corporate farms.

But they are also one of the last things keeping the small farmers solvent.

Yeah I agree. Cheering this on feels good, because fuck Trump and fuck Trump voters, but it is so shortsighted.

The remaining small- and medium-sized farms are going to go under, and get bought up by the big Ag firms. We are speeding straight towards a monopoly on farming in this country.

The consequences of an Ag monopoly will be devastating for the environment, devastating for the economy, and devastating for anyone who wants to eat healthy food.

You speak with certainty, but so much could happen.

Trump could die any day, by assassin or natural causes, and that would mean it is too late to pardon. Vance would not necessarily pardon anyone - he may treat Trump like a saint, or he might throw him under the bus because the Trump-Epstein sexual assaults and coverups are too politically damaging.

Also, doing a blanket pardon devalues the pardon itself. I think Trump is more likely to selectively pardon: People who have dirt on him, people who bribe him, and people who stay sycophantically loyal to him. Everyone else will get fucked like all the construction workers he never paid.

With all that said, yeah there is a good chance Bondi gets a pardon.

If our next president is a Republican or corporate Democrat, nothing will happen to her.

If we somehow get a populist Dem, then Obstruction of Justice Tampering with Witnesses/Evidence (18 U.S.C. § 1512) comes with a penalty of up to 30 years in federal prison. She would likely get sentenced to 10 and serve about 6 years for her role in the Epstein coverup.

I was a TikTok lurker for a couple years. The app is plagued with misinfo and low IQ slop, but this unregulated nature also made it one of the best sources for things that mainstream media ignored.

A good chunk of my algorithm was news about Palestine. Recently, suddenly, it all disappeared. Poof no more Palestine info, here’s some Israeli propaganda instead. Their moderation policy changed, so any comments with mild criticism of Israel were deleted. Discussion of Israel’s crimes will get your account striked and banned.

I can only assume this trend will be even worse with disgusting Zionist Larry Ellison bankrolling it.

Any self-respecting “meme historian” would refer to themselves as a memeologist.

They would know the history of the word “meme” and that it is explicitly intended to be analogous with the word “gene”.

We don’t call them gene historians, we call them genealogists.

There are many different accepted methodologies for measuring unemployment. For some reason the media only focuses on the U-3 value, and I agree that is highly misleading.

It sounds like the relevant statistic you are looking for is the U-6 value. U-6 is currently measured at a relative high of 8.7%. That is 30 million Americans who are unemployed or underemployed.

You can find all the data at the Bureau of Labor Statistics. Alternative measures of labor underutilization