Dekkia

https://meshmap.net/

Being shown in maps like this is opt-in, so there’s an unknown amount of users which are not displayed.

The people who make firing decisions often aren’t the ones doing the day-to-day work.

It’s very possible to be replaced by a machine that does a worse job, as long as your (ex-) boss isn’t aware of it.

Is it just me or has the amount of low quality posts increased recently?

When the 3DS came out I was sure it would be a stepping stone to 3D TVs that didn’t require glasses.

3D TVs basically died out by now.

The meme you commented under is about someone getting attention by prematurely stopping to take antibiotics.

If you don’t want people to assume what you mean, please add context.

Maybe you want to edit your original comment. It looks like you’re claiming it does.

Where in that document does it say that patients should decide on their own to stop taking antibiotics because they “feel better now”?

This is something one can bring up with the doctor who prescribed it, but not a decision to make on feelings.

Does google photos really index photos locally? I somehow don’t believe that.

I guess if you intentionally use a very efficent bulb you’re right.

I fully agree with your rant.

But LED bulbs do get warm enough that this still would work.

Context aware search, summarizing in side view or importing an agent directly from a repository into your browser are things that come to mind without much thinking, and i am not a developer.

And this is something normal users require?

And where to?

If both noteworthy browser engines are made by companies who make decisions against their user’s interest I might as well switch to the one with higher development budget.

The majority wants something that works with everything they throw at it out of the box without rummaging through settings.

And where does AI come into play here? It’s not like a browser without AI doesn’t work.

so asking us while FF wants to get NEW users

This is a balancing act and Mozilla behaves like an elefant in a porcelain shop right now. Worst case they loose their current users without attracting new ones.

existing users will bitch and moan even if it’s just one click

I’m one of them. Why not make it one click for people who want it instead?

very loud minority.

Please share your data that lead you to that conclusion.

They could do a survey amongst Firefox users about what they want.

But if the result is anti-AI they can’t claim anymore that they weren’t aware of their users opinions.

I hope people don’t buy the story that the kill switch was part of the plan all along.

This is clearly the result of mozilla scrambling for a compromise after the backlash to their recent announcement.

Edit: In the blog post that sparked the discussion there’s this sentence:

AI should always be a choice — something people can easily turn off.

They didn’t mention a browser-wide kill switch but I agree that that could be what they meant.

https://web.archive.org/web/20251216142601/https://blog.mozilla.org/en/mozilla/leadership/mozillas-next-chapter-anthony-enzor-demeo-new-ceo/

This is the definition of ethically sourced data from the Apertus website:

[…] the training corpus builds only on data which is publicly available.

So they still train on Websites, Blogs and Social Media. Ethical my ass.