

You’re absolutely right that this exists. Thing is, most defendents explicitly waive their right to a speedy trial. It’s to their advantage to drag things out, generally.


You’re absolutely right that this exists. Thing is, most defendents explicitly waive their right to a speedy trial. It’s to their advantage to drag things out, generally.


Major cases moving forward this slowly is not unusual at all. It’s usually to the defendant’s advantage to draw things out.
Usually directly feeding animals is looked down upon because decreasing their fear of humans tends to be a negative for their survival, and it might impact their ability to forage for their own food. With birds specifically, though, putting up feeders is more mixed. Migration takes an enormous amount of energy and and human sprawl has removed a lot of natural food sources. And especially in wintertime, food can be quite scarce for birds. But at the same time bird feeders can actually be big spreaders of disease and I know that there was guidance that people should take down feeders at the height of bird flu.
Now when it comes to mallards, they’re honestly a species that is incredibly urbanized already, so I don’t think directly feeding them is doing a great deal of harm.


Yeah I agree, way too little detail in this article.
“Oh haha sorry I was talking to my cat”
I really wonder sometimes if people are actually so bad with using their words or if they just play it up for Internet clicks.
Uhhh star wars took place a long time ago, are we sure that Obi-Wan didn’t become a Roman Emperor?