• Multiplexer@discuss.tchncs.de
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    46
    arrow-down
    1
    ·
    17 days ago

    Relevant lines from the article:

    If you look at the more niche Linux distros, they’re run by small teams of enthusiasts who simply don’t have the resources to tackle implementing the necessary systems and real-time API — it’s just not going to happen. In those cases, as Tom’s Hardware notes, their approach is likely to be labelling the OS as not intended for use in California.

    And I don’t see anyone in the firing line, except perhaps Californian citizens…

    • ViatorOmnium@piefed.social
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      9
      arrow-down
      1
      ·
      17 days ago

      Bigger distros will need to add the prompt, and the path of least resistance is to add it upstream.

      • Multiplexer@discuss.tchncs.de
        link
        fedilink
        arrow-up
        16
        ·
        17 days ago

        Would be interesting to see though what would happen if e.g. the Debian project just said: “Naa, thanks, we are fine without”. :-)

    • eli@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      3
      ·
      16 days ago

      And I don’t see anyone in the firing line, except perhaps Californian citizens…

      Which, what, Californians are gonna be IP/geo logged and blocked by distro websites from clicking the download button?

      Oh no! Whatever will I do! torrents