(If you know where I stole this from, I love you.)

  • cabbage@piefed.social
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    7
    arrow-down
    24
    ·
    1 day ago

    Oh yes, I forgot about that time they tracked down and kidnapped KDE contributors never to be heard of again, depriving the poor FOSS community from their freedom of choice.

      • cabbage@piefed.social
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        7
        arrow-down
        6
        ·
        1 day ago

        So apps look the way they are made?

        When I use KDE apps in GNOME they also look like KDE apps. Obviously - that’s the way they are made. If I want something else than what someone else created I will use something else, not complain about how they didn’t create it the way I personally prefer.

    • Buddahriffic@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      1
      ·
      1 day ago

      Lmao you hyperbole’d your own statement quoted back at you.

      Or have there been cases of KDE preferers/devs doing this to gnome preferers/devs?

      • cabbage@piefed.social
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        2
        arrow-down
        2
        ·
        1 day ago

        I was talking about users, not developers.

        I’m under the crazy opinion that developers are free to develop whatever they want, and users are free to use whatever they want. If they are unhappy they can use something else or become developers.

        If I develop something you do not want to use I do not restrict your freedom. GNOME developers are not restricting your freedom by creating a product that’s according to my preferences. They are giving us both freedom to choose what we prefer. The fact that GNOME is so different from KDE increases freedom of choice.

        I don’t get what is so hard to understand here.