futurk@feddit.org to Technology@lemmy.worldEnglish · 2 days agoTalents leave AI companies: "They are putting profits over sanity and safety"www.computerworld.comexternal-linkmessage-square116linkfedilinkarrow-up1797arrow-down16
arrow-up1791arrow-down1external-linkTalents leave AI companies: "They are putting profits over sanity and safety"www.computerworld.comfuturk@feddit.org to Technology@lemmy.worldEnglish · 2 days agomessage-square116linkfedilink
minus-squareXLE@piefed.sociallinkfedilinkEnglisharrow-up2·1 day agoLook up “shareholder primacy”. It’s enshrined in law. BTW you said Midjourney is a profitable company elsewhere. Can you provide a source?
minus-squareThirdConsul@lemmy.ziplinkfedilinkEnglisharrow-up1·18 hours agoIt literally isn’t. Google shareholder primacy and you’ll notice its a norm, not a law (in the USA). You can also Google Midjourney.
minus-squareXLE@piefed.sociallinkfedilinkEnglisharrow-up1·9 hours agoIt’s a judicial precedent https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Dodge_v._Ford_Motor_Co.
minus-squareXLE@piefed.sociallinkfedilinkEnglisharrow-up1·16 hours agoWhy don’t you show us your Google result that proves Midjourney made of profit?
minus-squareThirdConsul@lemmy.ziplinkfedilinkEnglisharrow-up1·14 hours agohttps://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Midjourney#%3A~%3Atext=The+tool+was+in+open
minus-squareXLE@piefed.sociallinkfedilinkEnglisharrow-up1·9 hours ago Holz told The Register in August 2022 that the company was already profitable. Is this still the case?
Look up “shareholder primacy”. It’s enshrined in law.
BTW you said Midjourney is a profitable company elsewhere. Can you provide a source?
It literally isn’t. Google shareholder primacy and you’ll notice its a norm, not a law (in the USA).
You can also Google Midjourney.
It’s a judicial precedent
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Dodge_v._Ford_Motor_Co.
Why don’t you show us your Google result that proves Midjourney made of profit?
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Midjourney#%3A~%3Atext=The+tool+was+in+open
Is this still the case?