• Aqarius@lemmy.world
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    2
    ·
    1 month ago

    I trust Dr. Pangloss of the neoliberal order to present his argument in a factual way that does not mention his links with Epstein.

    Considering the make-work program that is the US editorial section important conversation is how the Overton window got as narrow as it is.

    • janewaydidnothingwrong@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      1
      ·
      1 month ago

      I was unaware of any alleged ties to Epstein on Pinker’s behalf. I cant gauge the veracity of those claims as all information I can obtain is through the media and we know how little that’s worth. Very disheartening if true. However, I’m not sure it has much bearing on this particular discussion. That being said I do also think that anyone with confirmed ties to someone as vile as Epstein should become a pariah at the least.

      edit:spelling

      • Aqarius@lemmy.world
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        1
        ·
        1 month ago

        Look, I don’t know what exact word game you’re trying to play here, or why you’re spamming this exact comment evey time someone uses the word “neoliberal”, and to be perfectly honest I don’t care. But if you’re gonna pick a concept to be in denial of, I’d pick one without a wikipedia page.

        • lmmarsano@lemmynsfw.com
          link
          fedilink
          English
          arrow-up
          1
          ·
          edit-2
          1 month ago

          meme: you mad?
          I linked wikipedia, too: both articles agree. Work on your literacy.

          The ones in denial are dullards who use words without understanding them.