• hansolo@lemmy.todayEnglish
    13·
    16 hours ago

    If you read the Proton response to this article, it actually does seem like trying to figure out what’s going on with business process in a big picture way. Senior managers are interviewing, too. Not all staff are interviewing.

    Personally, I think it’s just as much about seeing who can’t QC the slop out off their code as anything else. Maybe. Or maybe I’m wrong, I dunno.

        • Doomsider@lemmy.worldEnglish
          2·
          7 hours ago

          No, they have a for profit company and a nonprofit entity that is a major shareholder. They operate just like a corporation with all the typical warts.

    • Victor@lemmy.worldEnglish
      32·
      5 hours ago

      How about don’t use AI to begin with so you won’t have to weed anyone out due to “potential slop”.

      Edit: this is in response to the parent comment, not to Proton…

      • Reygle@lemmy.worldEnglish
        3·
        14 hours ago

        I fear you may misunderstand their goal here- direct quote:

        “We need people who can translate AI’s capabilities into better products, stronger execution, and new ways of working — and who approach this change with curiosity, judgment, and urgency,” the email reads.

        They specifically want to “weed out” the ones who ARE NOT using AI