Sir. Haxalot@nord.pub to cats@lemmy.worldEnglish · 5 days agoDisplay technology, demonstrated by catcdn.nord.pubimagemessage-square73linkfedilinkarrow-up1972arrow-down111
arrow-up1961arrow-down1imageDisplay technology, demonstrated by catcdn.nord.pubSir. Haxalot@nord.pub to cats@lemmy.worldEnglish · 5 days agomessage-square73linkfedilink
minus-squarefuckwit_mcbumcrumble@lemmy.dbzer0.comlinkfedilinkarrow-up7·4 days agoBasically all IPS displays use pwm as well. Good panels use higher frequencies so they’re harder to notice. But it’s not the rule.
minus-square1984@lemmy.todaylinkfedilinkarrow-up1·3 days agoNot sure about that. On notebookcheck they test for pwm and about half of laptop screens have it, last time I checked. But I remember that most of the test winners had it.
minus-squarenao@sh.itjust.workslinkfedilinkarrow-up1·4 days agoIf that’s the case the frequencies are so high they are undetectable by conventional methods? Plenty of displays get tested as not using pwm.
Basically all IPS displays use pwm as well. Good panels use higher frequencies so they’re harder to notice. But it’s not the rule.
Not sure about that. On notebookcheck they test for pwm and about half of laptop screens have it, last time I checked. But I remember that most of the test winners had it.
If that’s the case the frequencies are so high they are undetectable by conventional methods? Plenty of displays get tested as not using pwm.