• minus@lemmy.zip
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    23
    ·
    11 hours ago

    When they destroy the physical copy they remove them from the antique stores market which often rely on circulation.

    Edit: Also physical copies don’t require electricity, a device and internet access plus they are something you can own.

    • Riskable@programming.dev
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      4
      ·
      8 hours ago

      If you think any more than 0.1% of these physical books would ever have ended up in antique bookstores, you’re dreaming.

      Think about how many books out there are things like Donald Trump’s biography, or pointless drivel from non-experts, self-help books that tell people to down “essential oils”, old editions of programming books, or just plain shitty fiction that never sold much in the first place.

      It’s ok to throw trash away! Really!

      • isleepinahammock@lemmy.blahaj.zone
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        1
        ·
        46 minutes ago

        Why would they scan that stuff though? That kind of mass market (human made) slop is easily available in digital form. We know the AI companies have engaged in mass digital piracy, including running massive torrenting operations. So if a digital copy exists, they probably already have it. And even if they have to buy it, purchasing an ebook is a lot cheaper than buying a physical one, shipping it, paying someone to scan it, etc.

        I would think the old, the out-of-print, the rare, and never-before digitized are the only things worth buying and physically scanning in 2026. Everything else has already been scanned or was born digital-native.

    • XLE@piefed.social
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      3
      arrow-down
      1
      ·
      11 hours ago

      At least digital storage prices have only been going down in recent months, right? /s